Jump to content

A Thought about Merit Plan...


JaxMan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I too was a kid who would have been given up on...the two students in question were both dismissed from the team and withdrew from the school as a result...the school attempted to provide our mission as long as they were students and afterwards as long as the student allowed...I would be more specific but in respect to the 2 kids and their families I won't say more...

 

Schools have missions...all schools want to prepare kids with a quality education and a future...some privates also have a religous mission...at JCS we want to introduce them to God...not save them...how their relationship with God progresses is up to them...when the mission of any school is threatened by a student..any student athelete or not...the mission of the school is bigger than the student...when that mission is threatened is the hard part...as Lazarus said I agree sports are a benefit not a right...I think taking away a benefit is good...I think dismissing a kid from school is only a last resort when the mission of the school is to be hurt...

 

Lazarus, if I misread your impressions I am sorry...I did not intend to lump you together with any group...my regrets

Edited by JaxMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Another really noticeable thing is MONEY. comparing the 1a public schools facilities, to the one I saw last night was like camparing a shack to a penthouse. Its just not fair.

But who's responsible for the facilities differences between public and private schools? Its the people who give, or don't give money to the public schools - you're elected officials.

 

Yet the perception that many seem to imply is that the privates recruit the athletes, the parents then pay their $5,000 per year, and the football programs at the privates end up with incredible facilities. And this is simply not the case.

 

Perhaps we would be better off with a system that looks at performance over strict enrollment. But it should be blind to the private-public debate. I would agree that if a program is successful, for whatever reason, then they should play against programs of similar success. However, I do like the idea of there being some minimum or maximum enrollment standards in the "tiers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...