Jump to content

The Countdown Begins...


Recommended Posts

QUOTE(supersteve17 @ Apr 15 2007 - 04:41 PM) 826438029[/snapback]I assume you are saying this IF the TSSAA loses? I thought the point has been made many times on these discussion boards that the NFHS would not endorse/approve two organizations or sanctioning bodies in the same state. Is that true or is that merely speculation? You seem to be advocating a split on stricly urban/rural lines. What about the rural private schools (of which there are really very few)? Would you play with them?

 

 

 

I think if you had about 150 each in two different groups, they'd approve both. I"m speculating on which teams would jump, some might feel comfortable competing with urban and metro schools. I don't think such a group would invite any private schools. Chattanooga area is what I'm most familiar with, sorry if people are tired of it being used, but with the remaining schools under such a scenario it might look like this:

A: Temple, Grace, Boyd-Buchanan, Silverdale, David Brainerd, Chattanooga Christian (with 21st Cent, Arts and Sciences, possibly Hamilton Heights or other current non-TSSAA schools in basketball)

AA: East Ridge, Howard, Brainerd, Tyner, Hixson, Notre Dame (possibly Signal Mountain and East Brainerd when they open)

AAA: Baylor, McCallie, Red Bank, Soddy-Daisy, Ooltewah, Bradley Central, Walker Valley, Cleveland

 

Plenty of good teams would remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Indian @ Apr 17 2007 - 08:47 PM) 826439859[/snapback]I think if you had about 150 each in two different groups, they'd approve both. I"m speculating on which teams would jump, some might feel comfortable competing with urban and metro schools. I don't think such a group would invite any private schools. Chattanooga area is what I'm most familiar with, sorry if people are tired of it being used, but with the remaining schools under such a scenario it might look like this:

A: Temple, Grace, Boyd-Buchanan, Silverdale, David Brainerd, Chattanooga Christian (with 21st Cent, Arts and Sciences, possibly Hamilton Heights or other current non-TSSAA schools in basketball)

AA: East Ridge, Howard, Brainerd, Tyner, Hixson, Notre Dame (possibly Signal Mountain and East Brainerd when they open)

AAA: Baylor, McCallie, Red Bank, Soddy-Daisy, Ooltewah, Bradley Central, Walker Valley, Cleveland

 

Plenty of good teams would remain.

 

 

Where would Lookout Valley be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can read the text of the meeting today at the Tennessean.

 

It reads like the SC really wanted answers from the BA camp that they couldn't provide to the satisfaction of the SC.

 

The biggest thing that stood out to me in the reading was the fact that the letters should have come from BA as a school. Instead they were sent out from Coach Flatt, this appears to be the issue that will give the TSSAA the "victory" in the matter if there really is one.

 

Espn reported that the SC will have a ruling in June.

 

If I had to guess I would say the SC will rule for TSSAA, and in the results I would look for TSSAA to give BA time served and not go after the $3000.00 or the other 3 years of probation. I thought it was just a 2 year deal until I read the transcripts of the meeting today.

 

But who really knows what will come of this...looks like the SC had a bigger issue to solve today....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Indian @ Apr 18 2007 - 07:40 PM) 826440673[/snapback]In the first group.

 

 

Would they (Lookout Valley) want to be grouped with all those private schools if given the choice? I have heard from a pretty good source that there are people currently in their administration that do not want to schedule private schools for athletic contests if they are not in their district or region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(KCHSCoach @ Apr 19 2007 - 07:31 AM) 826440868[/snapback]Its just a matter of time before a DI private sues the T$$AA for this arbitrary 1.8 multiplier, T$$AA problems are just beginning!

 

 

It wouldnt supriseme to see a private do that. TSSAA is trying to even the playing field for these kids and its upseting all the privates that do no wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(MPHSTIGERS87 @ Apr 19 2007 - 08:58 AM) 826440932[/snapback]It wouldnt supriseme to see a private do that. TSSAA is trying to even the playing field for these kids and its upseting all the privates that do no wrong.

 

That is actually working its way through the courts in a couple of other states. I believe the privates will let that set a precedent and the decide whether or not to pursue ... that is unless there aren't drastic changes after the BA v. T$$AA case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want this thing to be over! It has been over ten years and the cost to the state is ridiculous! I don't care how this thing turns out but a court needs to settle this once and for all.

 

I no longer care how it turns out but if the TSSAA loses this case, you can bet they will split out all private schools under any reorganization plan. The question is freedom of speech not freedom of participation and you will see all public schools in the United States search for ways to end association with private institutions. Many states already have their organizations structured this way and I have no doubt that the TSSAA already has such plans ready to go if they lose. In NC, we only have a handful of private schools that play in the NCHSAA. Most belong to independent leagues.

 

Again, it's time to end this case one way or another!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I believe that was last year. I was interested in the Jones vs Baker comment, so I went back and looked at GC. I am not a fan of either nor am I a baseball guru. This looks like to me the duel was not close and if the errors would not have been made Eagleville would have won. I assume you are a little biased. I do think your mph for Jeffcoat and Baker must be from last year.  Baker-85 pitches 67 strikes. 5.2 innings, 5H, 1BB, 0ER and 7K's. 3 errors  Jones- 78 pitches 37 strikes. 4 innings, 2H, 5BB, 0ER and 1K. 1 error   Adams and the UH kid are really good as well. What about South Pitt and Oakdale? I heard they have some good ones. 
    • I hate this for all the kids in the program and fans alike. I can't recall of anything like this before in my lifetime but I'm sure it isn't a first. After criminal investigations are complete and the TSSAA looks into this the program it will be facing Nuclear Winter for some time to come. It's always the innocent left behind that end up paying the price for something someone else has done. I'm sure the transfer portal will be very active in Clinton over the summer months. How could you find a good coach worth his salt that would take on a situation like this not knowing what will happen. 
    • I’ve seen Jeffcoat in person twice and he was 84-87 both times and the one time I saw Baker he was low 80’s, he actually got out dueled by Jones from ER in that outing.
    • Pirate fans, thread is up on the baseball message board. 
    • Let's get and support the Pirates in Murfreesboro. 
×
  • Create New...