Jump to content

Coaches Box


bigAsports
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would love to see this changed. Six feet is a joke to try and coach from, and referees are often times too concerned about watching the box rather than something much more relative to the game itself. Most coaches are simply coaching when they are out of the box, not yelling at the officials, which should not be a problem.

 

A final point would be that most coaches will not yell at officials who will talk with them. Too many officials simply won't communicate with coaches which only makes the coaches more irritated and likely to yell at officials to get their points across.

 

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The extended box will be a plus, I hope it passes as well.

 

Two things though;

1) Coaches will have a difficult time staying in the box no matter how big it is

2) There will always be referees who are overly concerned if a coach gets one step out of the box.

3) It's gonna be hard to enforce this year if it passes as most schools will not have made the adjustments to

their home court.

 

Remember the good old days when the coach had to remain seated on the bench at all times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The extended box will be a plus, I hope it passes as well.

 

Two things though;

1) Coaches will have a difficult time staying in the box no matter how big it is

2) There will always be referees who are overly concerned if a coach gets one step out of the box.

3) It's gonna be hard to enforce this year if it passes as most schools will not have made the adjustments to

their home court.

 

Remember the good old days when the coach had to remain seated on the bench at all times?

 

There was a west Tennessee girls coach who solved the "remain seated" problem. He coached in a chair with wheels on it. You should have seen him rolling up and down the sidelines! Hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a west Tennessee girls coach who solved the "remain seated" problem. He coached in a chair with wheels on it. You should have seen him rolling up and down the sidelines! Hilarious.

 

Thats a clever solution /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the coach is actually coaching his team both on the floor and on the bench, then there is not a good reason for the box not to be expanded. To steal a phrase from George Plaster, "lets be honest," if an official is going to T up a coach for being out of the box it doesn't matter if it is 6' or 60'. It is going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the coach is actually coaching his team both on the floor and on the bench, then there is not a good reason for the box not to be expanded. To steal a phrase from George Plaster, "lets be honest," if an official is going to T up a coach for being out of the box it doesn't matter if it is 6' or 60'. It is going to happen.

 

losing the coaches box at 6 feet doesn't seem like much of a loss - but losing the other extended box would be more damaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I would love to see this changed. Six feet is a joke to try and coach from, and referees are often times too concerned about watching the box rather than something much more relative to the game itself. Most coaches are simply coaching when they are out of the box, not yelling at the officials, which should not be a problem.

 

A final point would be that most coaches will not yell at officials who will talk with them. Too many officials simply won't communicate with coaches which only makes the coaches more irritated and likely to yell at officials to get their points across.

 

Just a thought.

 

I can tell you from experience referees would like to see the larger box. I have officiated for many years, and have always felt if the coaches are coaching then it doesn't matter where they stand. After all it is called a coaches box not a refereeing box. To address the comment about officials worry too much about the box, well let me say we have to enforce the rules no matter how silly they are or we will suffer the conseqences. If we ignore the coaches box can we ignore traveling? Yes we do have consequences, I was working a blowout game some folks from the state office was there to watch as I had been nominated for a state tourney that year., the coach of the team being blown out was having what i would term friendly banter with me after the game was questioned why I didn't "T" him up for being out of the box. I still got to work the state that year but If you think about it that is a RULE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can tell you from experience referees would like to see the larger box. I have officiated for many years, and have always felt if the coaches are coaching then it doesn't matter where they stand. After all it is called a coaches box not a refereeing box. To address the comment about officials worry too much about the box, well let me say we have to enforce the rules no matter how silly they are or we will suffer the conseqences. If we ignore the coaches box can we ignore traveling? Yes we do have consequences, I was working a blowout game some folks from the state office was there to watch as I had been nominated for a state tourney that year., the coach of the team being blown out was having what i would term friendly banter with me after the game was questioned why I didn't "T" him up for being out of the box. I still got to work the state that year but If you think about it that is a RULE.

 

 

I didn't mean to imply that referees should not enforce the rule. My point was that when the box is only six feet wide, if a coach takes two steps he or she is out of the box, and now the referee has something else to deal with. Basketball may very well be the hardest sport to officiate (I was a certified referee in basketball and an umpire as well once upon a time) and widening the box may make the job a little bit easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...