Jump to content

Camden at Waverly


papatiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sorry most teams if they were only down 20 to camden, thought it was close

 

Yes, but Adamsville was down by 2 at half to Camden.

Waverly was up by 20 at the half and Adamsville had 21 total yards.

The lone Adamsville score came after a Tiger turnover on Waverly's 29 yard line. Adamsville had 85 total yards for the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 488
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

From my perspective, I see Camden winning this one by three touchdowns or more.

 

Waverly has a good QB and a few good receivers, but the Waverly offensive line will not be able to protect him for anything more than short routes and quick hitters. If Waverly can establish a running game early and set up some play action, they'll have a chance to move the football. But if they line up in shotgun and try to throw the ball downfield, this game will be over early.

 

Camden needs to take the football and score, making Waverly play catch-up the whole game. If Camden can get an early lead, they can force Waverly into being one-dimensional. The Lions front four will be able to pin their ears back and rush the QB without bringing extra backers.

 

All in all, Waverly just doesn't have the team speed and the depth in the offensive snd defensive line to keep up with Camden for four quarters. I expect there will be a few "OOOOOOOOO" shots on both sides, but when the game settles down, the cream will rise to the top.

 

Camden 35 Waverly 7

 

I agree on two things. There will be a few "OOOOOOO" shots on both sides, and Waverly doesn't have the depth Camden does. But disagree on the rest. Waverly's first line is as good as any in the Region. They will line up in the shotgun 90% of the time as they have all year, since they run the spread. They will be able to pass and they will score. I think Camden's offense is perhaps a little better, by looking at their scores, but I think Waverly's defense is better, by looking at the scores. But we shall all see tonight. You guys have a safe trip over the bridge. And I'll make sure I'll tell my officers (who you call Barney) that you guys are coming through J'ville.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but Adamsville was down by 2 at half to Camden.

Waverly was up by 20 at the half and Adamsville had 21 total yards.

The lone Adamsville score came after a Tiger turnover on Waverly's 29 yard line. Adamsville had 85 total yards for the game.

 

 

 

True but adamsville did not score after half and camden rolled, my son is a freshman on camden, and from what we talked about the attitude going into that game was all wrong.

I respect waverly, work with lots of folks from humphrys co. you all have a good program, and lots to be proud of, but tonight I think camdens depth and older players lead this one.

 

Not that Coach ward had it all wrong, I just think the players themselves thought it was going to be easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quick note...to the seniors for waverly: great job this year guys on making such an improvement from last season, keep up the work and lets see how much ya'l want the title!! keep it clean but deliver some good hits....

to camden seniors: great season, way to keep the camden tradition rolling this year and not falling back with the rest of the region, hopefully our team will be able to give you a close hard fought game that both sides of the river will remember...good luck in playoffs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...