Jump to content

Rule Question...Does the run count?


trucko
 Share

Recommended Posts

Situation: 1 out, runners on 1st and 3rd, Fly ball to left field. Fly ball caught for out 2, runner on 3rd tags and crosses the plate. Runner on first may have been stealing and is rounding second as the fly ball is caught. The throw from the cut off beats the runner back to first for out 3. Does the run still count?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It is a force out at first. Run does not count.

 

 

I disagree with bat r up, I'm no ump, but my thoughts are that once the ball was caught by leftfielder, as out #2, the play is live, the runner on third safely tagged and scored, hence the throw to first was a fielders choice which eventually became the third out, therefore the run counts.

Just my guess............good scenerio.....thanks for waking my brain this morning!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Situation: 1 out, runners on 1st and 3rd, Fly ball to left field. Fly ball caught for out 2, runner on 3rd tags and crosses the plate. Runner on first may have been stealing and is rounding second as the fly ball is caught. The throw from the cut off beats the runner back to first for out 3. Does the run still count?

 

 

Run counts if she crossed plate prior to the 3rd out being recorded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It counts.

 

But out of curiosity...Did the umps there NOT let it count? /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":blink:" border="0" alt="blink.gif" /> Or should I ask,..Why are you asking? /flower.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":flower:" border="0" alt="flower.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a force out at first. Run does not count.

 

 

Sounds like a double play to end the inning, it is a force back at first no tag needed. Just because the runner on 3rd happens to get home before the throws makes it back to first doesn't matter.

 

If the player on first had also tagged & was thrown out at second after the runner from 3rd crossed the plate the run would have counted.

 

Hey, I could be wrong but thats how I see it. /flower.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":flower:" border="0" alt="flower.gif" />

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a double play to end the inning, it is a force back at first no tag needed. Just because the runner on 3rd happens to get home before the throws makes it back to first doesn't matter.

 

If the player on first had also tagged & was thrown out at second after the runner from 3rd crossed the plate the run would have counted.

 

Hey, I could be wrong but thats how I see it. /flower.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":flower:" border="0" alt="flower.gif" />

 

 

But don't the throw to the cutoff mean anything? I think it became a fielders choice play. What was the runner on third suppose to do just stand and watch? Will look foward to an answer instead of all this guessing, and I ain't sure I'm right either!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the runner on first did not tag up, it is still a force play and therefore the run does not count. It does not matter if the throw in from left goes to every player on the field first, as long as it beats the runner back to 1st you have a force out. Inning over, no run scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I have no affiliation with Maryville anymore outside of being a 2nd generation graduate from a large family of Rebel alumni. That relationship ended courtesy of the lame duck AD (a Bearden grad I might add) and the HBIC. That said, I could care less if a private school comes through and offers every promising athlete out of that school or any other school better opportunities.
    • A perfect example is for athletes at Clinton High School. I will completely understand, and hopefully everyone should understand why they want to, and as of right now, it looks like that’s going to happen in numbers over the summer.
    • I mean, that’s easy to say when it hasn’t happened to your school that often, if at all, but yeah, I think everybody should be for the student athlete or player. Whatever they think will help them or their athletic career, I feel like they should be able to do that, even if that means transferring schools. Now I don’t really get that when you have almost every offer you could want and then jump ship, but what can I say? I guess money talks. 
    • I for one am all for it. 
    • Covid killed the city because they chose not to play football in the 2020 season. Therefore, kids weren't able to practice and develop, and continuing to lift weights. Memphis basically had 7/8 graders, skipping a year, then playing 9/10 high school football. Now, there's only one team that has made a "dent" which will be Southwind (made it to the 5A semifinals last year).  If you want to go more suburbs, then it'll be Houston, which won the 6A state title, defeating Oakland Other than that, I agree.
×
  • Create New...