baller95 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 I will give what i think will be a finals list for Region 1. Scores i will hold off on: 106 - Brockwell (SS) vs. Fagundes (GR) 113 - Boatman (GR) vs. Whitaker (SE) #2 vs #4 in the state per Bray's rankings 120 - Williams (ME) vs. Hurley (TN) should be a tight match 126 - Armstrong (SS) vs. Smith (SE) 132 - Vaughn (SH) vs. Taylor (TN) 138 - Stookesbury (SEY) vs. Cline (MW) 145 - Bagley (SH) vs. Callahan (EL) 152 - Begley (DB) vs. Broyles (MW) good match same result 160 - Buck (EL) vs. Porter (ME) 170 - Brown (GR) vs. Bagley (SH) could be a couple others there 182 - Brown (JC) vs. Elliot (SE) 195 - Begley (DB) vs. Shropshire (Boone) #2 vs #4 in the state per Bray's rankings / watch Brunson (ME) though 220 - Hayes (SH) vs. Allen (Sevier) 285 - Cannon (SEY) vs. Araiza (Sevier) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGreene Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 If Smith is back at Sullivan East, he is probably the most likely to be in the finals or maybe Morris from Happy Valley. Dont see much depth at 126 this year and i don't think Andrew will have much trouble in Region 1. Morris is also 120. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooksbrothers Posted January 21, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 Why does everyone forget austin frye..? He pinned Dalton Callahan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newcoach215 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 Why does everyone forget austin frye..? He pinned Dalton Callahan. he also pinned cline Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz19 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 I will give what i think will be a finals list for Region 1. Scores i will hold off on: 106 - Brockwell (SS) vs. Fagundes (GR) 113 - Boatman (GR) vs. Whitaker (SE) #2 vs #4 in the state per Bray's rankings 120 - Williams (ME) vs. Hurley (TN) should be a tight match 126 - Armstrong (SS) vs. Smith (SE) 132 - Vaughn (SH) vs. Taylor (TN) 138 - Stookesbury (SEY) vs. Cline (MW) 145 - Bagley (SH) vs. Callahan (EL) 152 - Begley (DB) vs. Broyles (MW) good match same result 160 - Buck (EL) vs. Porter (ME) 170 - Brown (GR) vs. Bagley (SH) could be a couple others there 182 - Brown (JC) vs. Elliot (SE) 195 - Begley (DB) vs. Shropshire (Boone) #2 vs #4 in the state per Bray's rankings / watch Brunson (ME) though 220 - Hayes (SH) vs. Allen (Sevier) 285 - Cannon (SEY) vs. Araiza (Sevier) You got half right on 160 and 170.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshiebaby Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 Bagley and Frye are neck and neck - I went Bagley not because of the obvious but becuase of Soddy tournament 6-1 Bagley head to head, no disrespect to Frye intended if I had listed two kids per weight class I would have had Frye with Bagley I think the two should be 1 and 2 seed and should meet in regional final. Tonight may help muddy the water further or clear this up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baller95 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 You got half right on 160 and 170.... Sorry I didnt know Porter had gone to 152, but really your point is that I dont have Jones and Spangler in there isn't it? I will take Bond instead of Porter and Bagley still. I really think both classes are thin and Jones and Spangler could be there, but just because you push them constantly I will stay opposite for kicks. I don't know if I will sleep tonight with you thinking I'm half right. It is an opinion, get over it and make your own list if you want to voice your choices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingGreene Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 You got half right on 160 and 170.... Let me guess... Because your TN High boys aren't in there, right? Jack, Buzzbro, Jones (ranked #3 in the state per THSfather) and Josh Spangler (ranked #5 in the state per THSfather) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshiebaby Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 (edited) Sorry I didnt know Porter had gone to 152, but really your point is that I dont have Jones and Spangler in there isn't it? I will take Bond instead of Porter and Bagley still. I really think both classes are thin and Jones and Spangler could be there, but just because you push them constantly I will stay opposite for kicks. I don't know if I will sleep tonight with you thinking I'm half right. It is an opinion, get over it and make your own list if you want to voice your choices. If this were facebook you would get the like bomb dropped on your comment here from many! Any of us can add our own lists as well right??? we all have different perspective and influences upon our perspectives... step out of the shadows and put your guess on here thats what this fun thread is for... Edited January 21, 2013 by marshiebaby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
humorwrestling Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 Sorry I didnt know Porter had gone to 152, but really your point is that I dont have Jones and Spangler in there isn't it? I will take Bond instead of Porter and Bagley still. I really think both classes are thin and Jones and Spangler could be there, but just because you push them constantly I will stay opposite for kicks. I don't know if I will sleep tonight with you thinking I'm half right. It is an opinion, get over it and make your own list if you want to voice your choices. Baller--let me tell you why he won't make his own list because you can't make a list with just 2 wrestlers! And I tend to agree with your picks at both. Good luck on your sleep tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newcoach215 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 (edited) Sorry I didnt know Porter had gone to 152, but really your point is that I dont have Jones and Spangler in there isn't it? I will take Bond instead of Porter and Bagley still. I really think both classes are thin and Jones and Spangler could be there, but just because you push them constantly I will stay opposite for kicks. I don't know if I will sleep tonight with you thinking I'm half right. It is an opinion, get over it and make your own list if you want to voice your choices. what does porter dropping do to 152? Edited January 21, 2013 by newcoach215 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baller95 Posted January 21, 2013 Report Share Posted January 21, 2013 what does porter dropping to 52 do to that class? I don't think he changes the top 2 of Begley and Broyles. I believe everyone is chasing those 2, but anyone can get caught. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.