Jump to content

White House vs CAK


Bump11
 Share

Recommended Posts

It was a straight red. Not a second yellow. He can't play in final. If it would have been a second yellow, he would be able to play.

Unfortunate, but will learn a lesson.

 

Cak still wins 2-0 in the final without Creel

 

I believe you are incorrect. From my contacts, he was given the first for the foul and the second for dissent. Either way, he can't play (a soft red is still a game suspension)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a straight red. Not a second yellow. He can't play in final. If it would have been a second yellow, he would be able to play.

Unfortunate, but will learn a lesson.

 

Cak still wins 2-0 in the final without Creel

 

It was 2 yellows. NOT straight red. And like he said ^ either way he is suspended and will not play friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me clear it up BigG and bump11. when I said it was a straight red, I was meaning the second time. Yes, he got a yellow, and then a straight red. it was NOT 2 yellows. (my source read the report) also.......................................... bigG, I believe you are incorrect. if he would have been given a 2nd yellow, he would be allowed to play in the championship. Cak should still be fine. they had to do this last year also because of Creel's red card:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...