Jump to content

CAMPBELL COUNTY @ SOUTH DOYLE


CarolinaCrazy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why would AC not play CC and OR?? I don't buy the "unhealthy" aspect that is being thrown around in regards to CC. I guess AC will decide to try to get that game on the schedule again when those Norris kids get a tad older and more experience.

Why does the AC game mean so much for the cougars? They couldnt beat AC with the two best teams ever in CC history. I for one  dont see it being that big of lost. If I had to pick OR or CCto play I would pick OR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would AC not play CC and OR?? I don't buy the "unhealthy" aspect that is being thrown around in regards to CC. I guess AC will decide to try to get that game on the schedule again when those Norris kids get a tad older and more experience.

The "unhealthy" thing was brought up by CCrazy.  Now he's acting like AC is ducking CC and criticizing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

click click boom!  You guys know I don't have a side on this one because I think the games should be played.   The CC coaches contend that they wanted to play and AC for whatever reason declined to play them.  But yes, I will miss the funnin' and the click click booms.  And I can't believe they aren't going to play OR either.  I just don't get that one at all.  That's a good rivalry game between two good teams with no hate, within the county, excellent gate for both schools?  I'm scratching my head on this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "unhealthy" thing was brought up by CCrazy.  Now he's acting like AC is ducking CC and criticizing that.

Well I'm on record long before catholic and Webb did their thing about not playing AC if they didn't have to. These people all live together, go to church together, go to cousins birthday parties together etc. it just gets way too personal for me. Most of it comes, and I hate to say, the Gilliam family. It starts there and now it ends there. I don't care if they ever play again personally. If they do, so be it, I just won't miss it like you guys will.

 

As for me saying AC is ducking them? I told u a first hand account of Price telling me they both have week 10 open and AC won't play them. I'm not acting like nothing, I'm telling you the truth, if you don't believe me, ask Gaddis.

 

Here's the deal. CC and OR are going to be pretty good next year, agreed? OR clearly the favorite. AC not nearly as good.

 

So if AC loses to Fulton, catholic, for sure. Then you throw in two potential losses to OR and CC, that's 4 losses right there. Then u have one mishap, and wallah your.500 team. That's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm on record long before catholic and Webb did their thing about not playing AC if they didn't have to. These people all live together, go to church together, go to cousins birthday parties together etc. it just gets way too personal for me. Most of it comes, and I hate to say, the Gilliam family. It starts there and now it ends there. I don't care if they ever play again personally. If they do, so be it, I just won't miss it like you guys will.

 

As for me saying AC is ducking them? I told u a first hand account of Price telling me they both have week 10 open and AC won't play them. I'm not acting like nothing, I'm telling you the truth, if you don't believe me, ask Gaddis.

 

Here's the deal. CC and OR are going to be pretty good next year, agreed? OR clearly the favorite. AC not nearly as good.

 

So if AC loses to Fulton, catholic, for sure. Then you throw in two potential losses to OR and CC, that's 4 losses right there. Then u have one mishap, and wallah your.500 team. That's all.

Maybe it really is an issue of not wanting another 900 pound gorilla in not playing Oak Ridge.  But I really don't think CC will be nearly as good as they were this year.  You lose Jeffers, Elkins, Torres, the LB/RB whose name escapes me, the other good senior WR, among others.  That's hard to replace.  Yes, AC loses a lot too and in all likelihood we'll be down a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it really is an issue of not wanting another 900 pound gorilla in not playing Oak Ridge. But I really don't think CC will be nearly as good as they were this year. You lose Jeffers, Elkins, Torres, the LB/RB whose name escapes me, the other good senior WR, among others. That's hard to replace. Yes, AC loses a lot too and in all likelihood we'll be down a bit.

You've got a point about having to replace kids that graduated. We should be ok in the secondary and WR positions. Good talent but lacking game experience. Both lines and LBs will be improved. The big ? Is the QB position. That's what next years success will hinge on. Have to develop a serviceable QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got a point about having to replace kids that graduated. We should be ok in the secondary and WR positions. Good talent but lacking game experience. Both lines and LBs will be improved. The big ? Is the QB position. That's what next years success will hinge on. Have to develop a serviceable QB.

I heard thackerson is coming to CC after New Years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Had what I believed would’ve been a good one hired but he showed up and smelled the cooking going on and said no thanks. 
    • Yeah.  Kids only transfer in and out of Bearden these days, you know.   That particular poster evidentially has a personal vendetta with Josh Jones.   Consider the source.  And the kid transferring to McCallie is a terrific talent, but an opportunity to go to McCallie on scholarship (and I am assuming that is the case) is one that is very much beneficial both athletically and academically.  McCallie is a great school for both.   Bearden will be fine.  And so will both of those kids who decided with their parents/advisors to go elsewhere.  
    • I think we are conducting interviews now since we have so many wanting to come to school here and play for a real team with a chance to play in front of lot's of fan's and have a chance to win a championship every year.  
    • Esteemed colleagues, On this auspicious Saturday morning, I fortuitously encountered Dr. Satterfield at the Early Bird Cafe, whereupon we engaged in a discourse concerning the pool of candidates vying for a coveted position. Dr. Satterfield, possessing a discerning eye, has graciously shared insights into the contenders, which I shall now relay to you in a structured manner. Eric Vetetoe, though initially absent from my considerations, ascended to the zenith of Clint's roster, poised atop his discerning clipboard as a preeminent candidate. Kyle Gregory, with a coaching demeanor reminiscent of a bygone era, has captivated Clint's admiration. His interview performance, I am informed, left an indelible impression, aligning seamlessly with Clint's nostalgic sentiments. Davy Cothron's cerebral approach to offense, notwithstanding a past championship game setback, garners high praise from Dr. Satterfield. His strategic acumen, it appears, remains unblemished despite previous trials. Brandon Eden's steadfast allegiance to the team, evidenced by his tenure on the creekbank, earns him considerable favor in Clint's estimation. Anticipation lingers as to whether an offer may be extended in recognition of his unwavering dedication. Wesley Satterfield emerges as a compelling candidate following a favorable assessment by Mr. Satterfield himself. The prospect of a Satterfield succession holds a certain allure, embodying continuity and tradition in equal measure. Kyle Shoulders, a surprising entrant in the applicant pool, impresses Clint with his football intellect, potentially positioning him as a contender for the role. Josh Hackett's defensive prowess, particularly in encounters against Trousdale over recent years, earns commendation from Coach Satterfield, underscoring his proficiency in the strategic aspects of the game. John McNeal's track record of success across multiple sports affords him undeniable merit, though the prospect of his acceptance, if offered, remains uncertain. Chad Evitts, a former NFL luminary, presents a unique opportunity, recognized keenly by Mr. Satterfield, to infuse our program with elite expertise and experience. Matt Dyer, revered for his contributions during the regular season, faces scrutiny for his playoff performances, a dichotomy that weighs upon Clint's evaluation. Chuck Gentry, endorsed by Dr. Satterfield, embodies the promise of transformative leadership, drawing parallels to his past triumphs in revitalizing programs akin to ours. Clint extols BJ West's astute management at the middle school echelon, where his strategic maneuver of strategically calibrating the team's schedule to optimize performance stands as a testament to his sagacity and acumen in navigating competitive dynamics. In conclusion, the deliberations surrounding our prospective leadership remain nuanced and multifaceted, underscoring the significance of this decision in shaping the future trajectory of our esteemed institution.  
×
  • Create New...