catswild Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 3 hours ago, atrisk said: Absolutely is !! Hopefully the new offense was not too hard to implement. My thinking is alot of the way the season will go rest on the legs of #2. Very interesting. I have NEVER viewed the season to have much to do with the "legs" of #2...his "arm", yes...but not his "legs". Please explain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atrisk Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 Looks like we are going to line up in some sort of spread formation most of the time. This will enable #2 to see the field and receivers somewhat better (in theory). This formation will automatically make him a running back(single wing type). He can run the ball and if he gets to the second level of the defence, some DB wii suffer "stingers" trying to get him to the ground. I believe his running will have to be accounted for by the opposition. IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 34 minutes ago, catswild said: Very interesting. I have NEVER viewed the season to have much to do with the "legs" of #2...his "arm", yes...but not his "legs". Please explain 7 minutes ago, atrisk said: Looks like we are going to line up in some sort of spread formation most of the time. This will enable #2 to see the field and receivers somewhat better (in theory). This formation will automatically make him a running back(single wing type). He can run the ball and if he gets to the second level of the defence, some DB wii suffer "stingers" trying to get him to the ground. I believe his running will have to be accounted for by the opposition. IMO. I'm not sure his speed will ever put him at the second level but you're right, he looks like he's a load and will punish those would be tacklers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atrisk Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 2nd level sometimes, sometimes not. I'm "old school" give me 4 or 5 YDS. between tackles anytime. Maybe we should go to a different thread to discuss specifics. This is HV vs OR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 13 hours ago, atrisk said: 2nd level sometimes, sometimes not. I'm "old school" give me 4 or 5 YDS. between tackles anytime. Maybe we should go to a different thread to discuss specifics. This is HV vs OR. You brought up the idea of #2, his legs, and his getting to the 2nd level. Since #2 is the OR QB, your belong on this thread. If you want to have a "general" discussion of the 2nd level and the game of football, then let's go to another thread! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atrisk Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 WHATEVER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnoxVil Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 Hawks by a tinkle! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oridgecat Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 vul, I heard your falcons have been keeping it vanilla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnoxVil Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 28 minutes ago, oridgecat said: vul, I heard your falcons have been keeping it vanilla. We have no chance in this new region. The OR's, CC's, Powell's, and the new Clinton's of this region seem to have it locked up. Maybe we should just take our ball and go back to 4A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 5 hours ago, atrisk said: WHATEVER. Since "whatever" doesn't really mean anything, it should probably be moved to it's own thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 29 minutes ago, KnoxVil said: We have no chance in this new region. The OR's, CC's, Powell's, and the new Clinton's of this region seem to have it locked up. Maybe we should just take our ball and go back to 4A. To the contrary, Fulton should win this region hands down...just ask'em! But seriously, other than Maryville and Alcoa, who has been better around for the last MANY years? Based on returning talent I would rank the top three in our region to be 1) Fulton, 2) OR 3) West.............but I sure hope we beat Fulton. Right now I'm worried about HVA. Too many unknowns about OR and HVA played even against Fulton without playing their best player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetScience Posted August 15, 2017 Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 On 8/14/2017 at 10:26 AM, catswild said: LOL...I don't consider a donkey to be profane!!! Haha I know, but the T is really cracking down on using curse words and I'm probably one of the worst on here for it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.