Jump to content

Columbia Academy at Waverly Central (2nd around)


BulldawgsRise
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Wavo2004 said:

Should be a good game Waverly against Forrest had 3 tds called back and we had way to many pens last night the game wasn't as close as the score board said.  Waverly was flat last night Forrest took advantage of a flat team. 

I thought there were only two touchdowns called back. But nevertheless same with our game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Apache said:

This is the same song that was sung last year “Waverly’s ability to score at will would kill CA” Well how did that work out for you? What I witnessed at last years game when Waverly couldn’t score at will, they completely fell apart. Mostly on the sidelines. Coaches and players panicked, pointing fingers and yelling at each other. That is almost impossible to overcome in a big game. So what’s going to be different this year? I think CA has the ability to repeat last years game. Their defense could give Waverly big trouble and if they move the ball on the ground like they did last year and control the clock we could see the same result! The big question is can Waverly hold their composure together this time? But with the reports of player mutiny earlier in the season,it could be that monster is hiding and just waiting to rear it’s ugly head! Now for CA’s demons. It seems a big difference between this season and last is a lack of team support. I’ve heard more CA parents and more comments on Coacht that question the coaches decisions and whose playing what position than I’ve ever heard from them. Additionally they continue to bring up the loss of their QB has an excuse for a potential loss. So maybe it’s not always sunny in paradise! Once you start play offs it not always the team with the most athletic players that wins. All of your ugly demons will be exposed! This one in my mind is a coin toss. If CA pulls together they have everything they need to repeat last season. If they let Waverly get the momentum and get happy this could get uglier than a 4 eyed duck!

LOL. Where the heck you been all year. Trying to ruffle feathers? Nice. It is what it is. Everyone knows last year Waverly didn’t play well in the CA game. The players knew, coaches, family and fans. For whatever the reason is or was, it happened but that was last year. Everyone in Waverly has been looking forward to the opportunity to play CA again. I would love nothing more than for Waverly to beat the ever living life out of CA on the football field. Will it happen? Who knows?? We will find out Friday. I’m not going to sit here and talk smack as bad as I want to. Just going to sit back and hope that Waverly plays to their full potential. If they do... gonna be a long night for CA. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BulldawgsRise said:

I thought there were only two touchdowns called back. But nevertheless same with our game. 

It was 2. Kick off return... block in the back. And about a 40 yard run... holding. 

Most undisciplined I’ve seen Waverly all year. 7 or 8 false starts, multiple holds, block in the back, chop block and not to mention 2 lost fumbles. 

 

Edited by Trollin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Trollin said:

LOL. Where the heck you been all year. Trying to ruffle feathers? Nice. It is what it is. Everyone knows last year Waverly didn’t play well in the CA game. The players knew, coaches, family and fans. For whatever the reason is or was, it happened but that was last year. Everyone in Waverly has been looking forward to the opportunity to play CA again. I would love nothing more than for Waverly to beat the ever living life out of CA on the football field. Will it happen? Who knows?? We will find out Friday. I’m not going to sit here and talk smack as bad as I want to. Just going to sit back and hope that Waverly plays to their full potential. If they do... gonna be a long night for CA. 

My guess is, Ca's full potential is magnitudes better than Waverlys.  WIth that said, my faith in seeing that full potential is low ha

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BulldawgsRise said:

I think what I’m expecting to see is CA run the ball all night. Short yardage plays constantly and running down the clock. Keep the defense off the field

Y'all r not going to be able to jus run the ball.all night . Waverly will be able to stop the run . Yea they give up.some yards but when they need to.make a stop they get it done . All the players r fired up and ready for this rematch . It's going to be a great game . And it's going to be close no matter who wins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BulldawgsRise said:

I think what I’m expecting to see is CA run the ball all night. Short yardage plays constantly and running down the clock. Keep the defense off the field

I think that would be wise! If CA can execute they have a good chance taking this game. Just don’t let Waverly get happy! I think whoever maintains their emotions the best wins this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wavo2004 said:

Y'all r not going to be able to jus run the ball.all night . Waverly will be able to stop the run . Yea they give up.some yards but when they need to.make a stop they get it done . All the players r fired up and ready for this rematch . It's going to be a great game . And it's going to be close no matter who wins 

I don’t mean that by every single play. But the vast vast majority of the game. We got 4 or 5 guys who can carry the ball very well. And one of them is an incredible back. Rushed over 300 yards last night and has around 1500 yards this season on the ground

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BulldawgsRise said:

I don’t mean that by every single play. But the vast vast majority of the game. We got 4 or 5 guys who can carry the ball very well. And one of them is an incredible back. Rushed over 300 yards last night and has around 1500 yards this season on the ground

Nice im.looking forward to the lansdell  kid match up against 37 . But im.also looking for 45 yo have another big game against y'all.  He ran really well.last year against yall.last year. Should be a fun game . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wavo2004 said:

Y'all r not going to be able to jus run the ball.all night . Waverly will be able to stop the run . Yea they give up.some yards but when they need to.make a stop they get it done . All the players r fired up and ready for this rematch . It's going to be a great game . And it's going to be close no matter who wins 

Running the ball all night was pretty much what they did last year! If you don’t learn from previous experience I would expect the same result. That was the same story last year “Ya’ll are not going to be able to run the ball all night on us”. Then look who was crying at the end. Learn from the past!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Apache said:

Running the ball all night was pretty much what they did last year! If you don’t learn from previous experience I would expect the same result. That was the same story last year “Ya’ll are not going to be able to run the ball all night on us”. Then look who was crying at the end. Learn from the past!

This is true  but I think r run defense is better this year than last . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Marion just jumped ER as the favorites in the East. Two big time transfers for y’all kinfolks. Bullseye has been set now. I said it the last two years it is time and both times y’all let me down. Can’t say you’re short on talent this year or that you’re young. Time to put up or shut up. Surely y’all can get over the hump this year. I’m just keeping it real
    • Should have won by 30 last year if we played discipline at the very least. May have got 2 dogs up front but remember we have the best DL in the state on our team. Also added a 6’6” 320lb O lineman.
    • Marion County boys just got two DOGS. Y’all East Robertson folks better buckle your chin straps this year. They gonna have something for Groves up front this year. I’m just keeping it real 
    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
×
  • Create New...