Jump to content

HALLS @ SOUTH DOYLE


dawgs82
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dawgs82 said:

I know this game is two weeks away, but after last night's results, this game is possibly for a home game in the playoffs.

After watching Halls last night, SD SHOULD win this game. However if Young is out for the next two games as I’m hearing, that could make things interesting in this game. After seeing their score against Seymour last night, is obvious he’s most of the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, chsbobcat09 said:

After watching Halls last night, SD SHOULD win this game. However if Young is out for the next two games as I’m hearing, that could make things interesting in this game. After seeing their score against Seymour last night, is obvious he’s most of the offense.

Ive seen a couple videos and it’s very possible it’ll be overturned. 5StarPreps said that SD has already appealed the decision. Even without Young SD should’ve won that game. Of course that means they had Brang and Young out. SD seemed to get penalized on every big play. Hopefully this will be a wake up call and they’ll have Young back and Brang back sooner than later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, knoxfan28 said:

Ive seen a couple videos and it’s very possible it’ll be overturned. 5StarPreps said that SD has already appealed the decision. Even without Young SD should’ve won that game. Of course that means they had Brang and Young out. SD seemed to get penalized on every big play. Hopefully this will be a wake up call and they’ll have Young back and Brang back sooner than later. 

I’ll have to see the play to say wether or not it could possibly be overturned. If it was an honest bad call then it should be overturned. However if it was justified, they better not switch the rules around just because of an impending big game in a couple weeks. I honestly think that’s what this whole discussion is all about, it’s not about him playing vs Halls believe me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chsbobcat09 said:

I’ll have to see the play to say wether or not it could possibly be overturned. If it was an honest bad call then it should be overturned. However if it was justified, they better not switch the rules around just because of an impending big game in a couple weeks. I honestly think that’s what this whole discussion is all about, it’s not about him playing vs Halls believe me.

I don't have the video but did see it. What I saw seemed to be complete shoulder to chest. Now will they have enough evidence to overturn it, I have no idea. It was a very close call. I believe it should've been a crack back block and move on. I'm a fan and not a referee though. I just hate it for the kid more than the team. Young is such a great kid and has always worked hard and kept his head down. I think the targeting rule still needs a little help in high school football. Basically ejected 2 games for a very close call is a difficult penalty for high school football especially when you see a lot of teams made up of just a couple players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, chsbobcat09 said:

After watching Halls last night, SD SHOULD win this game. However if Young is out for the next two games as I’m hearing, that could make things interesting in this game. After seeing their score against Seymour last night, is obvious he’s most of the offense.

He couldn't be out for the next two games, just the next one  Jesse said two games because he was ejected early in Friday's game and the rule says the rest of that game and the next game, which in essence is two games in this case.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GBKEES said:

You can see the video here. One guy says there is a different view on Hudl from the end zone that clearly shows targeting but couldn't post a link. Looks like targeting to me. Leading with his head in to the face mask of the defender.

No contact was made to the helmet? The contact came from the shoulder into the chest. The end zone view shows that. SD wouldn’t have appealed the decision if they don’t have evidence that it’s not targeting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, knoxfan28 said:

No contact was made to the helmet? The contact came from the shoulder into the chest. The end zone view shows that. SD wouldn’t have appealed the decision if they don’t have evidence that it’s not targeting. 

It's been appealed, but the chances of the TSSAA overturning it are very slim.  They just don't do that very often. 

Having a targeting penalty call in high school football without the benefit of replay isn't fair to either the kids nor the officials.  It needs to be revisited.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Im asking everyone to keep roy whited and his family in your prayers. Coach whited won back to back state championships at white county in 98-99. He is very well liked and respected in this area. For those of you that dont know he went missing 3 days ago. No one knows where he is. His truck was found in a rural part of the county. Thanks again. We are all very concerned. 
    • West would be a good team to get behind if they can pull it off again like last year. That championship game last year was awesome. 
    • I say that because he stepped out of a MUCH better situation on his own than he would see at least his first 3 years at DCA and it would take at least that much to bring him back to coaching. There are other fish in the sea, but again money talks. Need to fix the girls hoops too. Now I'll try again. Who has Pierce locked in for his staff? Hearing a McGavock man but not the Iceman.
    • I’ve heard mostly good things from the gridiron. Lots of optimism. It sounds like the portal has mostly helped, though there are a few expected defections. Comeback year!
    • Rudesell 1 year at Crockett. Coach Tate 2 weeks a Bradford. South Gibson supposedly going with jcs middle school coach. Which isn’t who I thought would get it, I know the top 2 was between him and Obion girls head coach. 
×
  • Create New...