Jump to content

2A State Championship Meigs vs Peabody


Goldenpride
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, FightingBlue0 said:

6436FC12-45D1-4F89-B474-9B2009EA13F5.jpeg

Swafford stayed in the game after that hit and actually scored the next drive I believe.. Dickson went to the sideline and only played defense until the second half after that hit.

 

Make no bones about it.. Dickson ran him over, but the hit didn’t take Swafford out the game..
 

Having to run the ball every single play against  a great defensive team for two straight weeks might of affected his play the second half. This was my first time seeing Swafford and no offense to Dickson, but if Mr.Football means the MVP then Swafford should’ve received it again. 
 

IMO Meigs couldn’t of competed at the level they did this year without him... From what I seen today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, H2Oman said:

Swafford stayed in the game after that hit and actually scored the next drive I believe.. Dickson went to the sideline and only played defense until the second half after that hit.

 

Make no bones about it.. Dickson ran him over, but the hit didn’t take Swafford out the game..
 

Having to run the ball every single play against  a great defensive team for two straight weeks might of affected his play the second half. This was my first time seeing Swafford and no offense to Dickson, but if Mr.Football means the MVP then Swafford should’ve received it again. 
 

IMO Meigs couldn’t of competed at the level they did this year without him... From what I seen today.

I believe that hit may have made Swafford a little hesitant to meet Dickson. He was the straw the stirred the drink for Meigs. I knew If we came out of half and stopped him we had a chance at the comeback 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, H2Oman said:

Swafford stayed in the game after that hit and actually scored the next drive I believe.. Dickson went to the sideline and only played defense until the second half after that hit.

 

Make no bones about it.. Dickson ran him over, but the hit didn’t take Swafford out the game..
 

Having to run the ball every single play against  a great defensive team for two straight weeks might of affected his play the second half. This was my first time seeing Swafford and no offense to Dickson, but if Mr.Football means the MVP then Swafford should’ve received it again. 
 

IMO Meigs couldn’t of competed at the level they did this year without him... From what I seen today.

Swafford was the best player on Meigs team for sure. But he was not the best player on that field today. My biggest take away was Meigs defense. Early this week some Meigs posters got their panties in a wad cause someone specifically said that Meigs defense has no weakness. & when I questioned how they gave up 27 to South Pitt, all I got was flack. But I saw plenty of weakness in that 2nd half. Peabody mowed over them & Meigs never had a chance when the Tide got going. Peabody held them to only 30 yards total offense in the 2nd half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goldenpride said:

I believe that hit may have made Swafford a little hesitant to meet Dickson. He was the straw the stirred the drink for Meigs. I knew If we came out of half and stopped him we had a chance at the comeback 

I can agree with that.. Both kids were great ball players 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FightingBlue0 said:

Swafford was the best player on Meigs team for sure. But he was not the best player on that field today. My biggest take away was Meigs defense. Early this week some Meigs posters got their panties in a wad cause someone specifically said that Meigs defense has no weakness. & when I questioned how they gave up 27 to South Pitt, all I got was flack. But I saw plenty of weakness in that 2nd half. Peabody mowed over them & Meigs never had a chance when the Tide got going. Peabody held them to only 30 yards total offense in the 2nd half. 

From what I seen today.. ( again it’s a small sampling) If you take Swafford away from Meigs they are a good football team at best. 
 

If you take Dickson from Peabody they still would compete at a really high level.

 

Both teams had great line play, but Meigs was definitely limited in the skill positions with the exception of Swafford.

 

I’m not trying to disrespect either team or kid.. I was just amazed how many times Swafford carried the rock. Did Meigs have anyone else who touched the ball more than 5 times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, H2Oman said:

From what I seen today.. ( again it’s a small sampling) If you take Swafford away from Meigs they are a good football team at best. 
 

If you take Dickson from Peabody they still would compete at a really high level.

Exactly. Peabody is the best team in 2A. They proved that AGAIN despite what most people in the east thought. All year long we’ve had idiots try & argue that Peabody wasn’t that good because of the schedule they play. Peabody asserted their dominance today & shut the doubters up. Like I’ve said, Meigs has a good team. But they aren’t on the same level as Peabody. It showed today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FightingBlue0 said:

Exactly. Peabody is the best team in 2A. They proved that AGAIN despite what most people in the east thought. All year long we’ve had idiots try & argue that Peabody wasn’t that good because of the schedule they play. Peabody asserted their dominance today & shut the doubters up. Like I’ve said, Meigs has a good team. But they aren’t on the same level as Peabody. It showed today. 

Can’t argue that.. they won the state championship today.. I also believe that there was only one poster on the T that argued about the weakness of your schedule. Everyone else said you were the next up and coming LSU Tigers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H2Oman said:

Can’t argue that.. they won the state championship today.. I also believe that there was only one poster on the T that argued about the weakness of your schedule. Everyone else said you were the next up and coming LSU Tigers!

Trust me buddy. There was more than one. But as you can see none of them are here to eat their crow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Won't happen. College coaches will back the coach every time and it cost this young lady her senior season. Looks like the player may be right on this one. School let her  go after one season. This stuff happens more than you think. 
    • “No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team.” For language? I’m not seeing that as a dealbreaker. 
    • Why did the coach get rehired after she was let go as an assistant by the former Warren County coach and the current AD?? Is that accurate?? I am very familiar with situations like this. Suprised lawsuits haven't happend before. If the coach unfairly let the player go, I think she has a shot because it cost her a scholarship. No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team. Not going to happen. There are bad hires like this a bunch and kids are treated unfairly by coaches that can't coach a lick and have super long ropes somehow. Amazing how some of these coaches get hired and keep their job. 
    • I am going to assume you are not a lawyer, and most reasonable lawyers would not say the lawsuit has a zero percent chance in court. I agree with you that a coach has the ability to dismiss anyone from a team. However, Ms. Winfree was never presented with the opportunity to present her witnesses and have them tell the coaches and administrators what they heard. A lawyer could better explain the lawsuit and the grounds to you. Before you start making wild assumptions about the lawsuit, would it be too much to ask that you do a little legal research first? The lawsuit is dealing with due process, loss of property, and defamation.   You can read the lawsuit here: https://bdnewsletter.files.wordpress.com/2024/04/doc-1-complaint-filed-4-18-2024.pdf  
    • The administration took the path of backing the coach and whispering to people that the kid was a problem. The reality is that the kid was never a problem on a team or classroom. The player says she has witnessed who back her not saying the f-word.  Why did the coach make that story up and other stories? I am not Sigmund Freud and do not have an answer for the ex=-coach's behavior..  
×
  • Create New...