Jump to content

Week 8- Oak Ridge @ Greenville


CardinalGrey
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, SweetScience said:

Good show. Enjoyed listening to KJ and WR. Good kids. G-Man sounds confident that the offense is gonna improve quite a bit from now till the start of the playoffs. He’s forgotten more football than I’ll ever know, so I trust him at his word. Gonna be tough to see much improvement this week though.

I agree with you about this game. I'm not it matters this week if the offense improves or not...I expect a beatdown but I would love to see some improvement anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SweetScience said:

Yes, I respect that. He laid all the blame on himself, which is the stand up thing to do. He knows that ultimately the success of the team lays at his feet. I have a lot of respect for Joe. He’s a good man.

I was a little surprised he took that position of accepting all of the blame. I liked that he did, but I doubt a lot of head coaches would do that. I hope his optimism is accurate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, catswild said:

I was a little surprised he took that position of accepting all of the blame. I liked that he did, but I doubt a lot of head coaches would do that. I hope his optimism is accurate

Who else would the blame be on? I personally think that the majority of HC’s would take the blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, FilmCzar said:

Because the offense has been absolutely underwhelming and lathargic.

Underwhelming is being too kind.  But It's hard to run any offense when there is zero run blocking and zero pass protection.  Plus, I have watched Ellison call plays at two previous stops.  We were running his stuff in game 1 and 2.  Since then, we went back to the same old same old, trying to run off tackle and run pass plays that take way too long to develop downfield.  So, I'm not sure how much of the offense (game plan and play calling)  Ellison was actually being allowed to control.   Funny thing is, now that he's been fired, the offense is going back to the stuff they did in week 1 and 2, lots of movement and quick passes, which is exactly the same stuff Rodney wanted to do from the beginning.  Strange situation all around.   

Edited by oridgecat
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, oridgecat said:

Underwhelming is being too kind.  But It's hard to run any offense when there is zero run blocking and zero pass protection.  Plus, I have watched Ellison call plays at two previous stops.  We were running his stuff in game 1 and 2.  Since then, we went back to the same old same old, trying to run off tackle and run pass plays that take way too long to develop downfield.  So, I'm not sure how much of the offense (game plan and play calling)  Ellison was actually being allowed to control.   Funny thing is, now that he's been fired, the offense is going back to the stuff they did in week 1 and 2, lots of movement and quick passes.   Strange situation all around.   

How was it impactful in Week 1 & Week 2? Didn't we lose to South Doyle and Bearden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FilmCzar said:

 

How was it impactful in Week 1 & Week 2? Didn't we lose to South Doyle and Bearden?

I never said anything about impactful.  It was refreshing to see us at least trying to get the ball out into our playmakers in space.  It wasn't executed very well, but I liked what we were trying to do on offense.   I'm talking about how the offensive approach changed after week 2, now we fired the guy and we are going right back to what he wanted to do run from the get go.  It seems like a panic move to me.  And if you have watched OR play, do you think this o-line is going to all of the sudden be good at blocking?  I'm afraid at this point it is what it is, and it don't matter what we try to run.  

And another question.  We have so many guys playing both ways, why in the world wouldn't you let 33 and 38 play on offense?  Those two guys will get done whatever it is that you ask them to do and they are probably in the best conditioning shape than anybody on the team.  

Edited by oridgecat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oridgecat said:

I never said anything about impactful.  It was refreshing to see us at least trying to get the ball out into our playmakers in space.  It wasn't executed very well, but I liked what we were trying to do on offense.   I'm talking about how the offensive approach changed after week 2, now we fired the guy and we are going right back to what he wanted to do run from the get go.  It seems like a panic move to me.  And if you have watched OR play, do you think this o-line is going to all of the sudden be good at blocking?  I'm afraid at this point it is what it is, and it don't matter what we try to run.  

And another question.  We have so many guys playing both ways, why in the world wouldn't you let 33 and 38 play on offense?  Those two guys will get done whatever it is that you ask them to do and they are probably in the best conditioning shape than anybody on the team.  

I agree that Rodney was trying to get the ball in the athletes hands. JG is just too old school schematically. We wasted Tee as well, IMO. Now he has 1, 7, 13 and can't get them the ball. 33 & 38 should absolutely be playing on offense. 38 is an all-state linebacker that could be killing it on offense. Ultimately, the troubles are too systemic and will require a leadership change for anything meaningful to take place. Start there, then get the strength and conditioning dept fixed and we may have something... before the athletes start going elsewhere then we will be Clinton Sr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FilmCzar said:

I agree that Rodney was trying to get the ball in the athletes hands. JG is just too old school schematically. We wasted Tee as well, IMO. Now he has 1, 7, 13 and can't get them the ball. 33 & 38 should absolutely be playing on offense. 38 is an all-state linebacker that could be killing it on offense. Ultimately, the troubles are too systemic and will require a leadership change for anything meaningful to take place. Start there, then get the strength and conditioning dept fixed and we may have something... before the athletes start going elsewhere then we will be Clinton Sr. 

Exactly, Spot on brother.  Could not agree more.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...