Jump to content

Farragut William Blount fight


KnoxBball1969
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sounds terribly mismanaged by the officials and arbitrary "left the bench" rules. Especially to have not even gotten involved in the situation.

 

Shame for Farragut. Not surprised with WB not seeming to care. 

 

Heard a WB fan was throwing stuff at Farragut players too. I know theres a woman on the WB broadcast screamin and yellin who knows what as if a h.s. scuffle was the end of the world. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ihavenofriendzz said:

Sounds terribly mismanaged by the officials and arbitrary "left the bench" rules. Especially to have not even gotten involved in the situation.

 

Shame for Farragut. Not surprised with WB not seeming to care. 

 

Heard a WB fan was throwing stuff at Farragut players too. I know theres a woman on the WB broadcast screamin and yellin who knows what as if a h.s. scuffle was the end of the world. :/

How is the leaving the bench rule arbitrary?  Do you think players should be able to run out on the floor and escalate/participate in an altercation?

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Heisenberg said:

How is the leaving the bench rule arbitrary?  Do you think players should be able to run out on the floor and escalate/participate in an altercation?

There's nothing arbitrary about it and any coach worth his salt had made sure that his players know it. Do not leave the bench. 

 

I would be surprised if these players had not been told to never leave the bench. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was no celebration during a timeout. Equating those two circumstances is really reaching, imo. 

As for how far is too far, there were reports that most (if not all) of the Farragut players were at midcourt. I would suggest that's more than one step. 

I was not in attendance and haven't seen video either way, but players running onto the floor in a circumstance like this cannot be tolerated imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ihavenofriendzz said:

Arbitrary in the sense of how far did they step. They didnt even engage the other team. To expect them to just sit in silence is insane.

 

Is 1ft stepping off the bench? Is it 8ft? Who decides? You can have the rule all day, but not a single bench player got involved but is still punished for standing up and taking a step.

The TSSAA decides because they made/enforce the rules, and I am pretty sure the NCAA and NBA have the same rule.  If the players broke the rule by coming onto the court during an altercation, then they should suffer the punishment.  Coaches, referees, and police officers were out there to stop the fight.  Staying on the bench as a player is not insane in my opinion.  I hate it for Farragut since this is their best team in the last 20 years and would like to see them play Bearden again in an electric atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you all are missing the point here. 

It is an arbitrary rule if only TSSAA decides and aren't consistent. Either the rule is "leaving the bench" or it isn't. Leaving the bench is leaving the bench regardless of the circumstances.

Show me Farragut players coming off the bench and taking part in the scuffle.

This entire situation should have been a double tech, maybe ejection on 12 for Farragut and 20 for WB and continue on with the game.

It's pure incompetence on the refs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ihavenofriendzz said:

I think you all are missing the point here. 

It is an arbitrary rule if only TSSAA decides and aren't consistent. Either the rule is "leaving the bench" or it isn't. Leaving the bench is leaving the bench regardless of the circumstances.

Show me Farragut players coming off the bench and taking part in the scuffle.

This entire situation should have been a double tech, maybe ejection on 12 for Farragut and 20 for WB and continue on with the game.

It's pure incompetence on the refs.

You can argue what it SHOULD have been. But according to reporters, the game was canceled due to the lack of players. Athletics directors and coaches were told that… it’s a reality now of what happened. My question is what’s taking so long? Is Farragut arguing with the TSSAA? There have been teams in Knoxville that had similar instances and they received postseason bans…. Of course they are located in a different part of town with less money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • RR, you might remember. Didn’t someone hide the kicking shoe that game? It seems I remember we had missed a kick the week before, and we needed all the points we could get. We thought we had a better chance going for two, so $?&@$ hid the shoe after the first miss that game. No one on our sideline looked for it very hard.
    • I will never forget the 1983 Heritage vs Maryville game. I remember driving home and listening to WGAP. Can't remember the announcers name. He asked Coach Story why he kept going for 2? Story told him " Why didn't you ask Renfro that last year"
    • TSSAA will let them all go to Mase.
    • Well nothing new, the Mustangs are really talented again this coming season!  They very well could go undefeated in regular season.  We shall see what happens in postseason.  I think the path to state title game is a little clearer than years past.  I think the Stangs are going to be really good and I think the traditional teams around in 2A are not going to be as strong.  It should be a fun season!
×
  • Create New...