Jump to content

R4AAA


jimbo44
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, JustABlueFan said:

The LA game? Well that should have been the final straw for #11. She elbowed Butler in the gut too. I'm pretty sure that whole scenario came from the coach. Dude had zero reaction after the broken nose. Glad she is a tough one. 

Tougher than most kids on the football team. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Khall555 said:

As I said she was following her player and went through a screen. Emery did not even see the player she hit and certainly wasn’t intentional. The timing of the 2 intentional fouls just happened to be when the Jets took the lead in the fourth quarter. The first  was they were on a 7-0 run and the other they were inbounding the ball with a 1 point lead. Nothing against your team but that’s is home cooking from the refs. You won’t get that called anywhere in the UC.

If you don't see the player, you run smack into the screen. 32 has to act like the contact wasn't intentional. What 32 did and what the ref SAW, KEY POINT HERE WHAT THE REF SAW. Was 32 fore arming 24 under her chin. Remember its the refs point of view and not yours. This crap is why we can't keep refs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2023 at 1:56 PM, TtownReject said:

If you don't see the player, you run smack into the screen. 32 has to act like the contact wasn't intentional. What 32 did and what the ref SAW, KEY POINT HERE WHAT THE REF SAW. Was 32 fore arming 24 under her chin. Remember its the refs point of view and not yours. This crap is why we can't keep refs. 

You seem to misunderstand what I am saying. It’s clearly a foul but it’s certainly not an intentional foul. Tullahoma got 2 extra points on the scoreboard for something that happens 3 or 4 times a game. The other intentional call also gave Tullahoma another point and possession with a minute remaining. No Ref should ever interfere in a critical situation like that in an elimination game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khall555 said:

You seem to misunderstand what I am saying. It’s clearly a foul but it’s certainly not an intentional foul. Tullahoma got 2 extra points on the scoreboard for something that happens 3 or 4 times a game. The other intentional call also gave Tullahoma another point and possession with a minute remaining. No Ref should ever interfere in a critical situation like that in an elimination game.

IN YOUR OPINION. And When Upperman wins tomorrow night. I will say Congrats on their victory. Cause i have morals and I DO NOT BLAME OTHERS FOR A LOSS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2023 at 10:07 PM, UCSportsFan said:

Home cooking got the win for you tonight. Come Monday season ends

Its not home cooking. The Refs are from the South Central Association,so yes local association officials but I assure you they didn't cheat for Tullahoma. The refs in this area are just the absolute worse in the USA . There are literally 6 refs in the entire association that are good. They all have little man syndrome and have no knowledge of the game of basketball. Most of the clowns down here think the fans paid 5 bucks to watch them and its sicking. Coaches get techs for asking questions down here. Saturday night the Lawrence co coach got a tech for yelling at his player lol it was clear he was talking to his player to. There has been games where 20 plus fouls was called in the first half of games. I would highly suggest calling into the state and sending in video evidence. I totally understand the frustration and the sense of feeling cheated but every team down here feels that way every game.  Its a crime that they change the outcome of games and especially win or go home games. TSSAA should be embarrassed for allowing such buffoonery. Its heart warming  when all of us from down here get to see officials from other associations. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cumberland is 1-5 in the region the last few years, seems they have more concerns than this correct call. Teams like Upperman and Livingston don’t care about their blowout wins against overmatched teams in their former district or the former coach celebrating those wins as if they were playing in Murfreesboro. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Indian said:

Cumberland is 1-5 in the region the last few years, seems they have more concerns than this correct call. Teams like Upperman and Livingston don’t care about their blowout wins against overmatched teams in their former district or the former coach celebrating those wins as if they were playing in Murfreesboro. 

Thats because society has taught people the art of sore losing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
    • hey goat! how’s monterey looking this year?! 
    • several people actually. they said “snoball, do you know who railbird81 is on coacht?” I said, “never heard of her.” they said, “you ought to check it out they’re getting fired up on there like the old days.” well, you can imagine my disappointment when I came here expecting sharp, witty banter and all i found was more akin to toddlers slap fighting. and what looks like 1 guy/gal talking to themselves with multiple accounts.
×
  • Create New...