Jump to content

Gallatin @ Springfield


BruiseBrother98
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GWAVE1 said:

He has been a steady force these last 3 years.  I wanted nothing more than to see him continue running that ball when he went out last week.  He’s a great kid and all of us love him.  But we cannot quit because he isn’t out there.  Several might be called upon to fulfill his role who knows at this point.  But Gallatin will still run the ball, offensive philosophy won’t change, maybe situationally but overall it’s spread the ball around get your playmakers in position to score.  

I wouldn’t expect it to change the philosophy, but it will change the game and remainder of the season if in fact he is out the rest of the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DbCooper said:

I concur. I do think Springfield can win this game but will have to play top notch all 4 qts. Would love to see the Jackets finish no worse than 5-5 on the regular season if they win this one. Either way this game and the Beech game gives them some tough competition before heading to Memphis first round, something I hope bodes well for them. 

Need this one tonight badly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheCommissioner said:

Need this one tonight badly 

Will be huge challenge tonight. Offensively Jackets have struggled trying to put points on the board all year and it will take more than 7-14 points or it will be difficult to pull one out. Some of the games where we scored more points it was special teams and turnovers that came through. Jacket offense hasn’t put up many points when they are beyond the 50 or 20 , that has to change or it could be a long night. Hope for a good injury free contest tonight and safe travels for the folks from Gallatin , maybe some will take the scenic drive on 25 and see the beautiful fall colors and get a scent of that dark-fired tobacco smoke along the way , traffic jams unlikely through Cottontown and Cross Plains. Go Jackets !.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GWAVE1 said:

Can I say one thing.  This has bothered me this week and I just feel compelled to say this.  Why on earth would fans of a team give out injury information on a player?  It just seems stupid to do such on a social media site and not just this one!!  There I said it!  

I can tell it bothered you, imo I have no earthly idea as to why. It’s reasonable information opposed to just showing up to the game and having no clue as to why a kid isn’t playing… could be disciplinary, injury… etc. preferably I’d like to be told prior to game time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GWAVE1 said:

Can I say one thing.  This has bothered me this week and I just feel compelled to say this.  Why on earth would fans of a team give out injury information on a player?  It just seems stupid to do such on a social media site and not just this one!!  There I said it!  

 

9 minutes ago, MJGOLDENBEARS said:

I can tell it bothered you, imo I have no earthly idea as to why. It’s reasonable information opposed to just showing up to the game and having no clue as to why a kid isn’t playing… could be disciplinary, injury… etc. preferably I’d like to be told prior to game time. 

Technically I guess,  we have violated HIPPA policy.   
 

if you are alluding to scheming for Springfield, i think the game playing wasn’t changed. They planned the same with Brinkley as without. Gallatin has playmakers to take his place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheCommissioner said:

 

Technically I guess,  we have violated HIPPA policy.   
 

if you are alluding to scheming for Springfield, i think the game playing wasn’t changed. They planned the same with Brinkley as without. Gallatin has playmakers to take his place 

Yes the scheme may change a bit, brinkley was a bruiser and the other backs I’ve seen for Gallatin are a bit speedier. Either way, it hurts Gtown, but nothing they can’t acclimate to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...