Jump to content

Oakland at Mt. Juliet (Round 2)


MJGOLDENBEARS
 Share

Recommended Posts

MJ has the worst offense I've seen in a long time and that was before the key injuries they've had.  At no time last night were they a threat to score. Perry has got to decide once and for all what he wants to accomplish.  Continuing to hire young, lapdog (yes men) assistants is going to continue to yield similar results.  If MJ had any sort of offense at all last night they had a chance to win that game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TommyBahama said:

MJ has the worst offense I've seen in a long time and that was before the key injuries they've had.  At no time last night were they a threat to score. Perry has got to decide once and for all what he wants to accomplish.  Continuing to hire young, lapdog (yes men) assistants is going to continue to yield similar results.  If MJ had any sort of offense at all last night they had a chance to win that game. 

Not sure I'd put it that way but I think the offense has held MJ back for the last several years. Most years they have been solid defensively and have a good S&C program. They need to get Roger to show the young 'uns how it's done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2023 at 8:47 PM, Augustus said:

This has to be the worse defense that Oakland has had under Creasy's tenure.  Very undisciplined group.

Oh you thought I'd forget these posts. Here I am, bringing it up for you to see again. You are saying this about a defense who gave up ZERO touchdowns to Gallatin Mount Juliet & Riverdale. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2023 at 9:02 PM, Augustus said:

Watching these two teams play makes me wonder how they got to the second round.

I told you a week ago that  this was how a game looks when two teams are struggling near equally against each other to get downfield. 

Now look. No struggles getting downfield against a defense who couldn't hold them back in Riverdale. Offense looked a lot better, didn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thegreatone36 said:

Oh you thought I'd forget these posts. Here I am, bringing it up for you to see again. You are saying this about a defense who gave up ZERO touchdowns to Gallatin Mount Juliet & Riverdale. 

I could care less what you remembered or didn't remember. Oakland played with more passion than they did against an inferior Mt. Juliet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Augustus said:

I could care less what you remembered or didn't remember. Oakland played with more passion than they did against an inferior Mt. Juliet.  

10 points in 1st half vs MJ. Went back and watched the game. And they were the better team, yes.... But in no way possible were they EVER going to score 49 in first half like they did on R'dale. 

"Passion" didn't make up that much difference.  It's okay to admit you were wrong to think MJ should've  been beat by more than they did. 

17 vs Gallatin in 1st half, and all those points happened in the final 5 minutes of the 2nd qtr. This was their first 2 quarters  after losing to Riverdale in a game they should've won. So don't tell me they didn't bring energy this game either. Clearly they were playing hard. I was there. Sat and watched the whole thing. 

The wheels fell off for Riverdale. They fumbled on the first play and it all went downhill from there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thegreatone36 said:

10 points in 1st half vs MJ. Went back and watched the game. And they were the better team, yes.... But in no way possible were they EVER going to score 49 in first half like they did on R'dale. 

"Passion" didn't make up that much difference.  It's okay to admit you were wrong to think MJ should've  been beat by more than they did. 

17 vs Gallatin in 1st half, and all those points happened in the final 5 minutes of the 2nd qtr. This was their first 2 quarters  after losing to Riverdale in a game they should've won. So don't tell me they didn't bring energy this game either. Clearly they were playing hard. I was there. Sat and watched the whole thing. 

The wheels fell off for Riverdale. They fumbled on the first play and it all went downhill from there. 

Not sure you what point you are attempting to make, but let's just say for the sake of not debating that I was right and you were wrong.

Edited by Augustus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Augustus said:

Not sure you what point you are attempting to make, but let's just say for the sake of not debating that I was right and you were wrong.

Clearly you aren't right. You came on here last Friday night. Crying just like a little girl with hurt feelings and all. About how you were surprised either of those teams were in the 2nd round. And how it's the worst defense you've seen Oakland have. You were terribly wrong, and i called you out on it last week and again today. Accept that you were wrong about Oakland. It's all pasted above for everybody to read your idiotic takes from just 1 week ago. You can't hide it or deny it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, thegreatone36 said:

10 points in 1st half vs MJ. Went back and watched the game. And they were the better team, yes.... But in no way possible were they EVER going to score 49 in first half like they did on R'dale. 

"Passion" didn't make up that much difference.  It's okay to admit you were wrong to think MJ should've  been beat by more than they did. 

17 vs Gallatin in 1st half, and all those points happened in the final 5 minutes of the 2nd qtr. This was their first 2 quarters  after losing to Riverdale in a game they should've won. So don't tell me they didn't bring energy this game either. Clearly they were playing hard. I was there. Sat and watched the whole thing. 

The wheels fell off for Riverdale. They fumbled on the first play and it all went downhill from there. 

By the way old-timer, who died and made you an expert on football?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Augustus said:

By the way old-timer, who died and made you an expert on football?  

You think that I think I'm the expert? No, I just challenge your very idiotic takes you put on here publicly for us all to see. You say something that dumb, I'm going to call it out. That doesn't make me the expert. But I feel like I've played long enough and seen enough ball to make a pretty solid assessment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, thegreatone36 said:

Clearly you aren't right. You came on here last Friday night. Crying just like a little girl with hurt feelings and all. About how you were surprised either of those teams were in the 2nd round. And how it's the worst defense you've seen Oakland have. You were terribly wrong, and i called you out on it last week and again today. Accept that you were wrong about Oakland. It's all pasted above for everybody to read your idiotic takes from just 1 week ago. You can't hide it or deny it. 

You are like an old woman who has had their feelings hurt.  You are what is called a "clinger". You probably were on the dance team in high school and dreamed of playing football.  Such a brave old woman to call someone an "idiot" on a keyboard.

Edited by Augustus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...