Jump to content

Baylor vs Mccallie 1/25


FR615
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, FR615 said:

I really can’t say until it comes out. It’s in the meat of the lineup and two that were practically locks for state titles.

That’s unfortunate.

So, for those of us who will be in attendance for the Baylor/McCallie dual match we will see when they are not on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Whoweft said:

I hope you are correct, but I think McCallie will need a couple of more Baylor kids to get kicked out/disciplined for that to be correct (this year). 

I should have worded this better. I don't want any kids to get in trouble. My point was, Baylor is so far ahead of McCallie that I could not see how two kids missing the dual would change the result.  

I expect that if Baylor is not permitting two of its expected state champions to wrestle McCallie, it must be a serious matter. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoweft said:

I should have worded this better. I don't want any kids to get in trouble. My point was, Baylor is so far ahead of McCallie that I could not see how two kids missing the dual would change the result.  

I expect that if Baylor is not permitting two of its expected state champions to wrestle McCallie, it must be a serious matter. 

 

Weft, I honestly think it would've been a closer match than what you're giving McCallie credit for. Here's why I say that. I  think McCallie should win at lower couple weights and upper few weights with relative ease.? McCallie also possibly wins another weight class or perhaps 2 depending on the flip/lineups. Baylor would have been favored and expected to dominate through the middle of the lineup and the McCallie's kids jobs would have been to limit bonus points for Baylor. When you take away expected bonus points in two matches and possibly give up bonus in those 2 matches of a "somewhat" close dual, it very well could be the difference between winning and losing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FargoStrut said:

Weft, I honestly think it would've been a closer match than what you're giving McCallie credit for. Here's why I say that. I  think McCallie should win at lower couple weights and upper few weights with relative ease.? McCallie also possibly wins another weight class or perhaps 2 depending on the flip/lineups. Baylor would have been favored and expected to dominate through the middle of the lineup and the McCallie's kids jobs would have been to limit bonus points for Baylor. When you take away expected bonus points in two matches and possibly give up bonus in those 2 matches of a "somewhat" close dual, it very well could be the difference between winning and losing. 

This match could have gone either way with full lineups… slight edge to Baylor. McCallie should win by 15-20 now. 
 

Edited by FR615
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FR615 said:

I really can’t say until it comes out. It’s in the meat of the lineup and two that were practically locks for state titles.

I mean if it’s in the meat of the lineup and two lock state champs, process of elimination would tell you it’s gotta be Askew, Sturgill, or Norman… guess time will tell for sure. This would drastically change the D2 landscape if true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, cowcatcherII said:

I mean if it’s in the meat of the lineup and two lock state champs, process of elimination would tell you it’s gotta be Askew, Sturgill, or Norman… guess time will tell for sure. This would drastically change the D2 landscape if true. 

It’s not two of those three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Hmmmmm……doe dee doe doe….i drove the lawnmower down to practice today…….hmmmm…… we got some new faces………. One can run faster than my lawnmower in fifth gear…… a few will be disappointed come November that they jumped ship and went down to that sewage facility……. You can bet the lawnmower on that. 
    • I don't know what's going on in the town of McMinnville, but I've read this and it's disturbing.  I'm a "player" person, and I want what's best for the player. If a player gets cut off the team because she said the "F word" then good grief. I mean, come on guys. I wish there was a way for the player to transfer to a different program and just play ball. There are a lot of athletes that are stuck because they're in crappy situations regarding their team/coach. This is player just happens to be one them.
    • Won't happen. College coaches will back the coach every time and it cost this young lady her senior season. Looks like the player may be right on this one. School let her  go after one season. This stuff happens more than you think. 
    • “No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team.” For language? I’m not seeing that as a dealbreaker. 
    • Why did the coach get rehired after she was let go as an assistant by the former Warren County coach and the current AD?? Is that accurate?? I am very familiar with situations like this. Suprised lawsuits haven't happend before. If the coach unfairly let the player go, I think she has a shot because it cost her a scholarship. No college is going to offer a scholarship to a player that is kicked off of the team. Not going to happen. There are bad hires like this a bunch and kids are treated unfairly by coaches that can't coach a lick and have super long ropes somehow. Amazing how some of these coaches get hired and keep their job. 
×
  • Create New...