Jump to content

TSSAA Legislative Council Meeting


FBMan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sometimes life deals you things you don't like but they have to be dealt with anyway, how you choose is not for me to decide right or wrong. That being said, the very people that send their children to private schools also will gripe about the taxes paid and want these large urban schools because they are more "economical". The perferred route for me would be to fund education to the extent that no high school in the state has over 500-750 students. This would sharply curtail private enrollment and end this debate.

 

Several studies, one especially from Cornell University and several at the U.S. Department of Education advocate a small school agenda. It may be comming in the future.

Thats a fantastic idea! When a school reaches an enrollment of say 1100 mandate that a new school be built within 2 years. Small systems could then look to a magnate school for Vocational focus or academic focus, etc...

 

You might even see a movement towards special focus high schools that require testing and minimum requirements to get into. This could also open up a transfer rule after your sophomore year if you qualify and desire a different focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sometimes life deals you things you don't like but they have to be dealt with anyway, how you choose is not for me to decide right or wrong. That being said, the very people that send their children to private schools also will gripe about the taxes paid and want these large urban schools because they are more "economical". The perferred route for me would be to fund education to the extent that no high school in the state has over 500-750 students. This would sharply curtail private enrollment and end this debate.

 

Several studies, one especially from Cornell University and several at the U.S. Department of Education advocate a small school agenda. It may be comming in the future.

Thats a fantastic idea! When a school reaches an enrollment of say 1100 mandate that a new school be built within 2 years. Small systems could then look to a magnate school for Vocational focus or academic focus, etc...

 

You might even see a movement towards special focus high schools that require testing and minimum requirements to get into. This could also open up a transfer rule after your sophomore year if you qualify and desire a different focus.

Yeah but as always, the devil is in the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes life deals you things you don't like but they have to be dealt with anyway, how you choose is not for me to decide right or wrong. That being said, the very people that send their children to private schools also will gripe about the taxes paid and want these large urban schools because they are more "economical". The perferred route for me would be to fund education to the extent that no high school in the state has over 500-750 students. This would sharply curtail private enrollment and end this debate.

 

Several studies, one especially from Cornell University and several at the U.S. Department of Education advocate a small school agenda. It may be comming in the future.

Thats a fantastic idea! When a school reaches an enrollment of say 1100 mandate that a new school be built within 2 years. Small systems could then look to a magnate school for Vocational focus or academic focus, etc...

 

You might even see a movement towards special focus high schools that require testing and minimum requirements to get into. This could also open up a transfer rule after your sophomore year if you qualify and desire a different focus.

Yeah but as always, the devil is in the details.

Don't have to worry about the details!

 

Most good ideas are shelved when tax payers and politicians see potential price tags and once again shortchange "the future of America" to save a buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After all, with the disadvantages listed above it would appear there would be no reason to send your child to a private.

 

You are absolutely right, most public institutions will provide a better education overall than most small private schools. Except for some of the obvious choices like MBA, the Web School, McCallie, Baylor, and Christion Brothers, there really isn't any reason to send you siblings to a private school as far as education is concerned. However, there are other factors that may lend you to decide to try a private education, religious beliefs, smaller classroom size if the student is an average student who may need that extra attention,(If he is gifted or is learning disabled this should not be a factor, as most public schools are better equiped to handle these type students) the ability to participate in athletics where otherwise the choices are large metro schools where the student wouldn't make the team, may have some social problems adapting to a larger school, these are just a few of the reasons someone would consider a small private school. There is room for both private and public education, if our health care system was the same way, having the choice between public and private we would not have the problems we have to day in our health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • And can you tell me who those two quarterbacks were, and every kid that was put into college from Bearden is a Bearden kid? It’s kind of why they graduated from Bearden.   and I would definitely not consider ETSU “waste”…
    • Most of this is complete gibberish. But the one part I could decipher is putting kids in college. This coaching staff hasn’t put a single Bearden kid in college. They completed wasted one of the best WRs in East TN and have ruined two talented QBs. All because they’re in over their heads. 
    • Well, I’d hope the new coaching staff thinks they are all that because they can always walk around the school, anytime they want, thinking that, especially for what they’ve done for the student athletes and the players, putting more kids in college in his first season than the old coaching staff did in numerous years combined, but we will just sweep over that because I know you don’t like facts. But trust me, nobody wanted Mr. Big britches, made the star player switch to quarterback, which is ultimately the reason he ended up transferring to play the position. He loved, but unfortunately, had to be at another school because Mr. Big Britches doesn’t like when a teenager knows more than him, but can’t expect much coming from a guy who used all class throwing pencils up into the ceiling and making fun of football kids who were failing class right to their face, and in front of numerous students, even projecting on the board most of the time.
    • After that first paragraph, I can see why you’re a TA and not a teacher. Have you made the move from South Knoxville to Bearden yet?    Maybe he left because he is an actual teacher and coach, and didn’t want to be associated with a group of foul mouthed middle school coaches who like to pretend they’re big time. 
    • Yeah and the coach is gone. Whole bizarre situation here. We played them a couple of times at MTSU last few years. She was a player for sure. 
×
  • Create New...