mikey65 Posted June 10, 2006 Report Share Posted June 10, 2006 As to the 'pop ups' yes I would if I didn't have a pop up blocker, but it does slow the site WAY down when trying to access it. I thought it was just me because I am still on dial up. I timed it Monday and it took me 10 minutes just to sign on here. Did give me time to make a sandwich though. mikey65, about the bet to having taken more drug test. I will take it! Took more than 100 personally and had to administer more than 1000. You have to take LOTS of tests when you have a 'crypto' clearance. The same is true with a top secret clearance also, but I bet you are a few decades older than me. I can't believe it took you 10 minutes to get on here. This site probably loses more guests by having pop-ups than what it is worth to have them. Who actually reads pop-ups anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTVA Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 The same is true with a top secret clearance also, but I bet you are a few decades older than me. I can't believe it took you 10 minutes to get on here. This site probably loses more guests by having pop-ups than what it is worth to have them. Who actually reads pop-ups anyway? LOD has to spend so much money on food for the Clone, he can't afford DSL or cable modem. That's why he is still using dial up and praying the Clone gets a scholarship! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Old Dad Posted June 15, 2006 Report Share Posted June 15, 2006 LOD has to spend so much money on food for the Clone, he can't afford DSL or cable modem. That's why he is still using dial up and praying the Clone gets a scholarship! Amen! Unfortunately Bell South don't have DSL out where I am at and the cable goes out so much it wouldn't be worth it either. 'Clone' did get a job to help with college, of course he is working at a GROCERY store. Moving large heavy pallets is keeping him in shape though. There is another ex R'dale lineman working there who couldn't move a LARGE pallet with a pallet jack. Clone moved him aside and moved it. Manager asked 'how' clone could move it when the other lineman couldn't. Ross told him that was the difference between 6th string and a STARTER! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey65 Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 So is Knox County going to start drug testing players? And if so, will they test coaches t oo? They should, as well as anyone else in the school system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachT Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 I ABSOLUTELY agree. We should hold the entire team to the same level. I agree. And parents, too. Moms especially. Then we can get right to the problem where it begins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachT Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 I have to say that you are correct- the issues do begin at home and t he way kids are raised. However, for the team to have to drug test and the coaches NOT be tested is wrong. These coaches are supposed to be leading the kids by example. As a mom, I do the same. I am for random drug testing, one reason being that it gives a young person a perfect "out" to avoid the peer pressure. If, as a coach, I was the one who pushed to get drug-testing implemented then I would be the first in line. However, if the board or administration pushed this idea then I would expect them to be in line with me. And, if a player tests positive, should mom and dad be next in line? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikey65 Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 The problem is is that the people that set the rules do not have to follow them. The people with money can usually pay off the people in charge so they can set their own rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ole Dad Posted June 22, 2006 Report Share Posted June 22, 2006 I like the thought process. I haven't thought about it that way but it makes sense. I think you hit the nail on the head. Ole Dad I am for random drug testing, one reason being that it gives a young person a perfect "out" to avoid the peer pressure. If, as a coach, I was the one who pushed to get drug-testing implemented then I would be the first in line. However, if the board or administration pushed this idea then I would expect them to be in line with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEONARDSLOSERS Posted June 24, 2006 Report Share Posted June 24, 2006 (edited) When I was playing college ball, I got a phone call every monday at 6am to come random drug test. For some reason I was randomly selected every week for about 3 years. I was one of about 20 players that they tested the most -randomly. I must have been one they knew would pass it. Edited June 24, 2006 by LEONARDSLOSERS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDogDaddy Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 You have to start with the end in mind. If you have 6 players out of a 45 man roster who test positive for... lets say marijuana. If the school didn't pay for the tests (The Booster Club did) who has rights to the results. If the Coach asks that the results be withheld from the administration is he within his rights to ask? Do the parents have the rights to the results if the 18 yr old doesn't want them to? What about HIPPA? More importantly what does the coach do about the 6 kids? Kick them off the team? Suspend them from the team and send them to rehab? Turn them over to administration? Can the results of the test be made public information? Can the coach tell the press we had six kids fail a drug screen but not give names? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.