Jump to content

USA vs. Morocco


BigG
 Share

Recommended Posts

You are right. Onyewu's strength is his size, not his speed, and he did seem a step behind the Moroccan forwards. I think it's safe to say the whole team could use a little improving. But I think we could double our skill and still not get out of our brutal pool. But that's just my opinion.

 

 

Are you joking? If we doubled our talent, we'd win the world cup. Think about how good we'd be if every player was twice as good as they already are.

 

I like to split hairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think all of you are overreacting. Look at what the US team has been doing all week in Cary and you'll see why they looked a step slow last night.

 

Its called fitness work. When you do a ton of it immediately before games your side tends to struggle until you get your legs back under you.

 

Frankly I see the US improving dramatically over the next 3 games as they will only have light workouts and be focusing more on skills and team development in practice rather than running themselves ragged.

 

Looking at the way Morocco played how can anyone blame the US for lacking their usual attacking ferver? Frankly when the opponents forwards are spend most of their time in their own half its hard to break them down and players like Donovan and Beasley, who like to use their speed and vision on the break, tend to be negated.

 

Morocco came out with a gameplan to play it safe and hope for a goal on the counter and they executed well. The US does not have teams in their group that are so defensive minded so look for a completely different air about the US attack in the Cup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all of you are overreacting. Look at what the US team has been doing all week in Cary and you'll see why they looked a step slow last night.

 

Its called fitness work. When you do a ton of it immediately before games your side tends to struggle until you get your legs back under you.

 

Frankly I see the US improving dramatically over the next 3 games as they will only have light workouts and be focusing more on skills and team development in practice rather than running themselves ragged.

 

Looking at the way Morocco played how can anyone blame the US for lacking their usual attacking ferver? Frankly when the opponents forwards are spend most of their time in their own half its hard to break them down and players like Donovan and Beasley, who like to use their speed and vision on the break, tend to be negated.

 

Morocco came out with a gameplan to play it safe and hope for a goal on the counter and they executed well. The US does not have teams in their group that are so defensive minded so look for a completely different air about the US attack in the Cup.

 

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your point, and only time will tell. Nevertheless, they still have kinks to work out, and whats to stop Ghana from executing that same game plan? When you are one of the top 5 teams in the world, you have to beat a team like Morocco.

do you actually believe the fifa's rankin where they have both mexico and usa in the top 10 neither team has proved to be rank in the the top 10 team maybe when they win a world cup they can put them up there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you actually believe the fifa's rankin where they have both mexico and usa in the top 10 neither team has proved to be rank in the the top 10 team maybe when they win a world cup they can put them up there

 

 

If they won the world cup, they would be #1. Furthrmore, it's not about whether I believe it; it's whether or not they can prove it. And they did not prove it last night.

 

BTW, learn to use some puncuation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they won the world cup, they would be #1. Furthrmore, it's not about whether I believe it; it's whether or not they can prove it. And they did not prove it last night.

 

BTW, learn to use some puncuation.

 

its a forum not an essay for a teacher. but the sports bar idea sounds like a plan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the game obviously had a bad result, but i dont think it was the nightmare most would think.

 

the US played well in midfield and defense (barring the brain freeze from cherundelo). mastroeni and donovan played pretty well together i thought, with pablo hanging back to allow donovan to freely go forward. i think i even remember donovan racing back on defense a few times, somewhat surprising. however, he didn't have his best game where it counts for a player like him. his last pass always seemed to be a little off or slow. also, was it just me or did wolff seem invisible most of the game?

 

biggest disappointment: john o'brien

 

arena likes him cuz of his experience, but he is definitely rusty after his injury lay-off (his first touch let him down countless times). i think the big stage will inspire him in a few weeks tho.

 

best performance: mastroeni/convey

 

i thought mastroeni had a very good game in place of reyna. his passing was efficient and quick almost the entire game. convey brought some new style to the game after halftime with his running and quick crosses. however, he is used to playing in the fast paced game in england, where the world cup will be drastically slower paced.

 

especially after a sucker punch like the team got last night, they will be more aware that possession acounts for little at the end of a game. they will have to take their chances better, especially johnson/donovan. creativity was the big issue against morocco....a problem usually coinciding with a simple "off-game"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...