Jump to content

New 2-aa playoff system?


GIBSONJ
 Share

Recommended Posts

If travel and geography are the only things to consider, then it is about as good as it's going to get. That's really a consideration in the first and second round as you said. It would not be beyond the realm of possibility for teams in the northwest bracket to play teams in the southwest bracket in the first round to avoid region vs region rematches. That's all anyone is asking is to not have a 1 vs 4, 3 vs 2 rematch of the regular season. There's little excitement generated for such games for the underdogs and most fans would gladly exchange a little travel time for a different venue than one they've already seen or a team they've already played. Second round rematches, like the Lewis Co. vs Hickman Co. rematch have alot more intrigue than Lewis Co. vs Richland.

 

Why is travel the determining factor? It's not in the third rounds on up. The travel factor could be overcome. Rematches in the first round will kill the interest in the playoffs and we'd have to accept fewer teams OR we could apply a little logic and make the first round an experience worth experiencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If travel and geography are the only things to consider, then it is about as good as it's going to get. That's really a consideration in the first and second round as you said. It would not be beyond the realm of possibility for teams in the northwest bracket to play teams in the southwest bracket in the first round to avoid region vs region rematches. That's all anyone is asking is to not have a 1 vs 4, 3 vs 2 rematch of the regular season. There's little excitement generated for such games for the underdogs and most fans would gladly exchange a little travel time for a different venue than one they've already seen or a team they've already played. Second round rematches, like the Lewis Co. vs Hickman Co. rematch have alot more intrigue than Lewis Co. vs Richland.

 

Why is travel the determining factor? It's not in the third rounds on up. The travel factor could be overcome. Rematches in the first round will kill the interest in the playoffs and we'd have to accept fewer teams OR we could apply a little logic and make the first round an experience worth experiencing.

 

Might be that some teams can't travel on 25% of the gate. Surely you don't think the TSSAA is going to dip into their pockets to fund travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is correct. There were two wc with 5-5 records. They might have been 30th.

 

 

I was referring to having less teams make the playoffs. That would not include any wild cards. If you don't want

to play your own region...the only way to do that is to reduce the number of teams making the playoffs. It would not be a good plan to bus teams all over the state in early rounds. It is too expensive for most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody minds Father Ryan playing at MUS in the early rounds of Division II playoffs.

Nobody minds traveling from Memphis to Nashville in the 3rd round of Division I playoffs.

Travel shouldn't be the end all.

Play a jamboree at the beginning of the season in each region to fund the travel expenses for the teams in that region that have the furthest to travel. It's not the limiting factor that everyone makes it out to be. How could travel from the Kentucky line to the Alabama line be a problem in the playoffs, but not during the regular season? We have regions in 2A that stretch from northern tier counties to southern tier counties. What's so different about traveling 100 miles north and south rather than east and west?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I have no affiliation with Maryville anymore outside of being a 2nd generation graduate from a large family of Rebel alumni. That relationship ended courtesy of the lame duck AD (a Bearden grad I might add) and the HBIC. That said, I could care less if a private school comes through and offers every promising athlete out of that school or any other school better opportunities.
    • A perfect example is for athletes at Clinton High School. I will completely understand, and hopefully everyone should understand why they want to, and as of right now, it looks like that’s going to happen in numbers over the summer.
    • I mean, that’s easy to say when it hasn’t happened to your school that often, if at all, but yeah, I think everybody should be for the student athlete or player. Whatever they think will help them or their athletic career, I feel like they should be able to do that, even if that means transferring schools. Now I don’t really get that when you have almost every offer you could want and then jump ship, but what can I say? I guess money talks. 
    • I for one am all for it. 
    • Covid killed the city because they chose not to play football in the 2020 season. Therefore, kids weren't able to practice and develop, and continuing to lift weights. Memphis basically had 7/8 graders, skipping a year, then playing 9/10 high school football. Now, there's only one team that has made a "dent" which will be Southwind (made it to the 5A semifinals last year).  If you want to go more suburbs, then it'll be Houston, which won the 6A state title, defeating Oakland Other than that, I agree.
×
  • Create New...