Jump to content

New players at CPA


Hater247
 Share

Recommended Posts

No one is a golf fan from CPA. I guess that means they weren't brought in from the jr. Tour in the 8th grade. There is an interesting post on the 1a 2a football board with regards to CPA basketball. It is under Goodpasture football 2014. Why is it none of the old rivals play CPA anymore? Must be their mission statements. Lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put in the split and do away with the equalizer.  Equalizer only works with Football anyway.  Doesn't work in basketball or soccer or volleyball (though the smaller prep schools haven't embraced volleyball or girls' XC yet).  Once lacrosse is a TSSAA sport, it'll get worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • No one is a golf fan from CPA. I guess that means they weren't brought in from the jr. Tour in the 8th grade. There is an interesting post on the 1a 2a football board with regards to CPA basketball. It is under Goodpasture football 2014.anymore Why is it none of the old rivals play CPA ? Must be their mission statements. Lol!

 "Why is it none of the old rivals play CPA?" FRA was probably the best rival early on. CPA played at old dilapidated Bellevue High School. And FRA would come over and beat the crap out of CPA. We didn't like them and they didn't respect us - in any sports. FRA went to DIV 2 after CPA became competitive in most sports. Ezell was a great rivalry too. Great girls softball, football and basketball teams and they would just put it on us especially in softball and girls basketball - no contest. They are now DIV 2. DCA was a good rival too - great games against them. Goodpasture put in on us in most, if not all, sports too. Best rivalry was football with Goodpasture. Goodpasture downgraded to Single A - I think.  Lipscomb would not play CPA in the early years - not sure why. Then when they did have to play, due to being in the same district - great games in football, basketball and volleyball. Lipscomb and CPA in TSSAA's wisdom put us in different districts.                    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I believe money has changed hands or promises have been given so kids can transfer to CPA maybe not and I give them the benefit of the doubt.

However, CPA fans, can you at least say if the cream of the crop (regarding almost all sports) keep transferring in, therefore a disadvantage is placed on the rest of the schools.

You don't have to say your by the book, I will concede and assume you are, but can you admit when time after time athletes go to your school for sports purposes? Not religious backgrounds, or education to be received...to simply play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I believe money has changed hands or promises have been given so kids can transfer to CPA maybe not and I give them the benefit of the doubt.

However, CPA fans, can you at least say if the cream of the crop (regarding almost all sports) keep transferring in, therefore a disadvantage is placed on the rest of the schools.

You don't have to say your by the book, I will concede and assume you are, but can you admit when time after time athletes go to your school for sports purposes? Not religious backgrounds, or education to be received...to simply play.

Would you not concede that it is possible that good athletes come to CPA because of a combination of all you mention - a Bible based curriculum, a good education, a loving, caring faculty, and great athletics? CPA is not alone with that combination, but it is indeed rare. Is it unreasonable to believe that some parents want that for their children who are good athletes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember sportsnerd before you answer..anything is "possible"

I didn't really see a question unless you are referring to this: ,"........ but can you admit when time after time athletes go to your school for sports purposes?"

I did not deny that possibility, I simply offered the idea that without the other factors, I believe few of the parents would send their kids to CPA just for the sports. If so, they would take the scholorship money from one of the privates that pay kids to come rather than pay for them to go to CPA.

I don't debate public / private split anymore - it has been beat to death, and I really don't care which division they play in. But I do feel CPA is attractive to many athletes' parents because of many factors - not just sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We live in a free country, I did not ridicule parents for taking their kids to whatever school they want them to attend. I applaud them for making the best choice they feel is beat for their child.

 

What you are missing (or dodging) is the fact that the ability to bring in these athletes simply creates a disadvantage for those the TSSAA says they are forced to compete with. It's a yes or no. Agree or disagree?

 

A disagree tells me you turn a blind eye to the practices because your school is inferior to others (previous post). Furthermore, you would not be on this forum if you did not have an opinion on public v private

 

I did not bring that topic up, I simply asked since CPA has shown the ability (since they are such a great institution) to "attract" athletes it is fair to compete with those who can not? Brentwood academy, friendship Chr, FRA, BGA, chose to go a different route.

 

So I say to you apparently CPA is not a cut above compared to others around them. My opinion only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We live in a free country, I did not ridicule parents for taking their kids to whatever school they want them to attend. I applaud them for making the best choice they feel is beat for their child.

 

What you are missing (or dodging) is the fact that the ability to bring in these athletes simply creates a disadvantage for those the TSSAA says they are forced to compete with. It's a yes or no. Agree or disagree?

 

A disagree tells me you turn a blind eye to the practices because your school is inferior to others (previous post). Furthermore, you would not be on this forum if you did not have an opinion on public v private

 

I did not bring that topic up, I simply asked since CPA has shown the ability (since they are such a great institution) to "attract" athletes it is fair to compete with those who can not? Brentwood academy, friendship Chr, FRA, BGA, chose to go a different route.

 

So I say to you apparently CPA is not a cut above compared to others around them. My opinion only

We don't disagree, but it seems to me your complaint is with the TSSAA, not CPA. CPA is given the choice of DI or DII by the TSSAA and they chose DI (in your words, we live in a free country),  as other privates schools have (CAK, Boyd, etc.). You are arguing that they should not be given the choice, and that has been debated to death. If the TSSAA decides to do away with the choice, that would be fine with me. My opinion on public vs. private is that if the TSSAA wants to give the privates the option to stay DI, they have a right to choose it or not.

Edited by sportsnerd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...