gamecocker702 Posted December 16, 2014 Report Share Posted December 16, 2014 Why hire a re-tread? Most schools do this. If your going to lose why not give a young coach a shot. Nothing to lose. Any coach that is winning is not going to Warren County unless their is a problem somewhere. Take a chance hire a young coach. Hire someone that has energy to burn. Most re-treads are not going to have the energy to make Warren County a winner. No coach is going to make WC a winner. Have you not heard of the Super 32? And if this so-called "young coach" you are referring to is all that hot...why is he even in WC? If he's that great, would he not have other options? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlltimeVOL Posted December 16, 2014 Report Share Posted December 16, 2014 No coach is going to make WC a winner. Have you not heard of the Super 32? And if this so-called "young coach" you are referring to is all that hot...why is he even in WC? If he's that great, would he not have other options?I am not thinking of anyone in particular just a young coach to get a start. Yes I am aware of the Super 32. Any coach that is winning is not going to ruin his record at Warren County. Warren County hiring committee needs to forget about getting a coach with a good resume. Hiring off a resume is not the answer. Hire a good solid young coach that really wants it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecocker702 Posted December 16, 2014 Report Share Posted December 16, 2014 Cotten fan boy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pioneersports Posted December 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 16, 2014 It doesn't look good for either local boy.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecocker702 Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 It doesn't look good for either local boy.. Unless the "mafia man" bops his nepotism wand on one of them of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCTIGERFAN Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 (edited) Why hire a re-tread? Most schools do this. If your going to lose why not give a young coach a shot. Nothing to lose. Any coach that is winning is not going to Warren County unless their is a problem somewhere. Take a chance hire a young coach. Hire someone that has energy to burn. Most re-treads are not going to have the energy to make Warren County a winner. I agree with this completely. Why re-hire an ex coach that had very limited success during his previous tenure at the school? You already know what that coach has to offer, and what you will be getting from him. Being in a new region, wins will also be harder to come by. His results would most likely be even worse this time around. 99% of proven head coaches that are currently employed will not be interested in this job. That's the truth, and unfortunately just the way it is for WC. At best, you may be able to hire a quality coach who has been out of the coaching game for a few years. He likely wouldn't stick around long, and would use this job as a stepping stone. I truly believe the best approach for WC would be to hire a young coach. Someone that shows great potential, and could grow into the job, even if he isn't quite ready for it at the moment. Maybe he is an assistant for some top team in the state, maybe it's someone local. I don't really know. Any young coach that's able to experience any success at WC, would be more likely to stay loyal to the school if other programs came calling. This is simply because yall gave him his first shot at coaching, and it would be his "baby". You need someone who has the time and energy to build this program the right way, from the ground up. That's hard to do though when not given the right resources, full community support, and enough time to see it all through. The next coach should be given 4 years at the very least. There would be struggles and growing pains early on, but it often takes a full 4 year cycle to see the results you want on a yearly basis. Edited December 17, 2014 by DCTIGERFAN 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorsedge Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 sounds like they need to boot the AD!!! Look at his hires the last 6-7 years for all sports. When does the AD get called on the carpet for his failures??The D.M. said it was time to move the A.D. to the central office with the others flunkies and find a replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecocker702 Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 The D.M. said it was time to move the A.D. to the central office with the others flunkies and find a replacement. Tha AD doesn't make the choice on who to hire all by his lonesome. Check out who is on the selection committee as a whole. And you are also overlooking one important fact in all of this: replacing a head coach is one thing but keeping all the same dead weight assistants is another. Until WC cuts loose some of the goofballs on the coaching staff it wouldn't matter who was the HBC it would still be a loser organization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCTIGERFAN Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 Tha AD doesn't make the choice on who to hire all by his lonesome. Check out who is on the selection committee as a whole. And you are also overlooking one important fact in all of this: replacing a head coach is one thing but keeping all the same dead weight assistants is another. Until WC cuts loose some of the goofballs on the coaching staff it wouldn't matter who was the HBC it would still be a loser organization. An AD may have a selection committee that guides and gives him their opinions on who to hire, but the final choice is solely up to the AD. No one can actually make him go one way or another when it comes down to it. Sure there may be a extreme amount of pressure to choose someone in particular, but that's still only have a voice to be heard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecocker702 Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 An AD may have a selection committee that guides and gives him their opinions on who to hire, but the final choice is solely up to the AD. No one can actually make him go one way or another when it comes down to it. Sure there may be a extreme amount of pressure to choose someone in particular, but that's still only have a voice to be heard. Maybe that's how it works where you live, but not here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powereyeleadoption Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 they change the committee from 6 to 3 this time with the AD having 75% of the vote. It's his ballgame and he owns the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gamecocker702 Posted December 17, 2014 Report Share Posted December 17, 2014 they change the committee from 6 to 3 this time with the AD having 75% of the vote. It's his ballgame and he owns the ball. I'm still trying to figure how you divide 100% by 3 and come up with 75% of a vote for one person. Good at math much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.