Jump to content

Catholic vs Oak Ridge: A Rivalry is Born


WilleTheWildcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WildcatRealist said:

"...but anyone could see the difference in the players." Really...I couldn't. Does anyone that attended the game think that Catholic had THAT MUCH of a talent advantage? I attribute their victory to superior coaching (scheme) and execution.

There’s a fool in every crowd.......

Your problem with the coach, or coaches, is well documented. If you attended the game last night, and still make these comments, you’re not worthy of a response. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SweetScience said:

"Superior coaching scheme" Lol There was no superior coaching scheme. Catholic won because they have a little bit better players, made fewer mistakes, and won the special teams battle by a long shot, period. Superior coaching scheme's a$# SMH 

If you will, please reread my post.I said "superior coaching (scheme) and EXECUTION. SweetScience, you just defined SUPERIOR EXECUTION. As far as scheme, those around me sure grew restless as the Wildcats went down 28-6 and the coaching staff continued to use the full play clock every down to call the next play from the sidelines. Could they have possibly have wasted any more time? I call that coaching (scheme).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WildcatRealist said:

If you will, please reread my post.I said "superior coaching (scheme) and EXECUTION. SweetScience, you just defined SUPERIOR EXECUTION. As far as scheme, those around me sure grew restless as the Wildcats went down 28-6 and the coaching staff continued to use the full play clock every down to call the next play from the sidelines. Could they have possibly have wasted any more time? I call that coaching (scheme).

Well, it's tough to lose your SR kicker right before the game and have a kid step into the limelight in the 3rd round of the playoffs and expect him to execute very well, especially one that hasn't kicked all year long in an important time in a varsity ball game. That definitely wasn't on the coaches, but just bad luck on our end. I'm not going to sit here and bash the coaches for taking a little bit too much time for calling in plays. That's not the reason we lost the game. And it probably wouldn't even be in the top 5 reasons as to why we did. Like atrisk said though, you're entitled to your opinion.

Edited by SweetScience
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, WildcatRealist said:

, those around me sure grew restless as the Wildcats went down 28-6 and the coaching staff continued to use the full play clock every down to call the next play from the sidelines. Could they have possibly have wasted any more time? 

We must have been sitting close to each other then. Like going in at the half with 3 to's left despite having about 27 seconds and the ball. I've thought all season the defense has progressed ALL season, but the offense has just kinda "done enough" without having a solid base. Coach Gaddis said about the same thing post-game last night. I know I'm not the only one who questions the play calling - often times. 

It was a fantastic season, and I think without a doubt we could beat that Catholic team. Just not to be last night. 

The kicker had a "hip flexor" thing going on I heard from another parent. 

And for what it's worth I've had 2 tuition students since Linden and neither plays any ball. We chose Oak Ridge schools for the OTHER reasons! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, WildcatRealist said:

If you will, please reread my post.I said "superior coaching (scheme) and EXECUTION. SweetScience, you just defined SUPERIOR EXECUTION. As far as scheme, those around me sure grew restless as the Wildcats went down 28-6 and the coaching staff continued to use the full play clock every down to call the next play from the sidelines. Could they have possibly have wasted any more time? I call that coaching (scheme).

You’ve never liked the coach br, so I don’t put much stock in anything you say

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
    • No my fight, but ... if they were already college-caliber prior to transferring to BHS, and they already had FBS interest, and they end up at an FBS school, how did Bearden do anything for them?
×
  • Create New...