Jump to content

Turf war begins in Rutherford County


fredjones
 Share

Recommended Posts

So there is no "Real Turf" war going on in RuCo. What actally happened is the school admin, coaches and school board agreed upon is the school and parents, can go out and try to raise the 600k needed to install turf. They are not seeking county tax dollars or funds from the state. Essentially is a permission slip to try and raise the monies . I am hopeful that it happens and would love to see the school have turf and I believe it would be a great start to building the program .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Lost Old Dad said:

Good luck Blackman.  I really hope y'all get it.  Maybe if y'all get it the rest of the schools can swing theirs.

Thanks LOD I would love to see all the RuCo schools have turf, I just don't think we will. My guess is if any are funded by the county it will likely be Rockvale that gets it first.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FBfan26 said:

I wish Metro Nashville would follow smh...

It is a shame that on either side of the state many school small and large have turf filed and nice facilities and here in the Mid-State, we can't get the funding for it. Unless you are a private school its about impossible. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2018 at 4:28 PM, Blaze45 said:

It is a shame that on either side of the state many school small and large have turf filed and nice facilities and here in the Mid-State, we can't get the funding for it. Unless you are a private school its about impossible. 

Metro wont even say it's about the money "which we know it is with 13hs" They keep talking about player safety. From what I heard hillsboro was going to  Pay for theirs but it was blocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FBfan26 said:

Metro wont even say it's about the money "which we know it is with 13hs" They keep talking about player safety. From what I heard hillsboro was going to  Pay for theirs but it was blocked.

Here is the thing about safety someone needs to take to them. Turf playing surfaces reduce head injuries by as much as 80%. Duke University did an independent study and showed that the majority of concussions were not actually head to head hits, but rather head to field  injuries. In instances where the argument that grass is a safer surface argument/study has been done, it is based on the playing surface being maintained, properly loosened. (in other words soft , non compacted dirt or clay in our situation) witch passes certain GMAX testing   https://www.sportsfieldmanagementmagazine.com/columns/turf-health/testing-your-turf/    Colleges and pro teams that use grass fields also have a full time maintenance  crew that constantly manages the playing surface. They also do not have, 20 soccer, games , 5 track meets, middle school, jv, and youth football games, and band competitions on them either. The actual cost to maintain a grass playing surface to that level and then limit it to only 8-10 football games a year would far exceed the cost of turf and maintenance. It then also opens it up for additional uses that would otherwise render unusable, especially after lots of rain Which in turn if used further compacts the soil even more so .

Edited by Blaze45
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Blaze45 said:

Here is the thing about safety someone needs to take to them. Turf playing surfaces reduce head injuries by as much as 80%. Duke University did an independent study and showed that the majority of concussions were not actually head to head hits, but rather head to field  injuries. In instances where the argument that grass is a safer surface argument/study has been done, it is based on the playing surface being maintained, properly loosened. (in other words soft , non compacted dirt or clay in our situation) witch passes certain GMAX testing   https://www.sportsfieldmanagementmagazine.com/columns/turf-health/testing-your-turf/    Colleges and pro teams that use grass fields also have a full time maintenance  crew that constantly manages the playing surface. They also do not have, 20 soccer, games , 5 track meets, middle school, jv, and youth football games, and band competitions on them either. The actual cost to maintain a grass playing surface to that level and then limit it to only 8-10 football games a year would far exceed the cost of turf and maintenance. It then also opens it up for additional uses that would otherwise render unusable, especially after lots of rain Which in turn if used further compacts the soil even more so .

Well I just learned something new

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • What do ya’ll think the O/U will be? I would set the line at 2.5 
    • Playing high school sports is a privilege not a right.  The college did not have to rescind the scholarship.  Scholarship offers are pulled all the time for a number of reasons. That was 100% their choice.  A coach can keep, cut, or dismiss any player that they want to without reason anytime they want.  Is that the right way to run a program?? I don't think that it is, but these are the facts of the matter. This case has absolutely 0% chance of going in the plaintiff's favor. Futhermore, I'd imagine that these administrators and the coach are a part of some teaching or coaching organization that will cover at least 1 million dollars each in legal fees. Obviously the kid and her family feel like there were "damages" thus the lawsuit.  Unfortunately, the law is not on their side in this case.  
    • Maryville will recapture the loses from last year against West, Bradley and Farragut. The Bearden game will be the tough one but I look for the wheels to come off that ride somewhere down the road because of all the crap that goes on there. I know to many parents there and some of the things I've been told and some of the post a few of them have made on facebook. They all can't be liars.
    • If Heritage moves down and Alcoa moves up the best thing for Heritage is to do what William Blount did when theystopped playing Maryville or meet certain defeat. Honestly can't see Alcoa not moving up the way the county is growing. Might be in the Mountaineers best interest to stay in 5A because none of those teams on their schedule are anything close to Alcoa.
    • I say over as well. Barney, regarding the move to 4A, will the cross-town blowhards move up as well??
×
  • Create New...