Jump to content

Columbia Academy at Waverly Central (2nd around)


BulldawgsRise
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BulldawgsRise said:

That is completely wrong I’m sorry. CA did not practice for that game all year. Coach Lansdell preaches that he wants the state championship. He doesn’t preach beat this team in the quarterfinals in a couple months. CA was Better than Waverly last year. That’s a fact. Waverly had a great offense but CA was a better complete team and they showed it that night. Waverly had no answer for anything that came their way. 

 

I agree that CA was the better team last year. The other side of that is that they should be pretty much the same team this year! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BulldawgsRise said:

That is completely wrong I’m sorry. CA did not practice for that game all year. Coach Lansdell preaches that he wants the state championship. He doesn’t preach beat this team in the quarterfinals in a couple months. CA was Better than Waverly last year. That’s a fact. Waverly had a great offense but CA was a better complete team and they showed it that night. Waverly had no answer for anything that came their way. 

 

I been saying all yr that CA hasnt played anybody and when they they lost. Waverly has suffered some losses as well but to extremely talented teams and two of those teams we lost by 7. I still say we win this game by multiple scores. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vandyfan1 said:

I been saying all yr that CA hasnt played anybody and when they they lost. Waverly has suffered some losses as well but to extremely talented teams and two of those teams we lost by 7. I still say we win this game by multiple scores. 

I’m talking about with the team last year. He was talking about how we played for the Waverly game all season last year which isn’t true. Defense wins games and CA looks like they’ve gotten back on track. Waverly May win by a lot but don’t count on it. CA will be coming to play I guarantee it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vandyfan1 said:

I been saying all yr that CA hasnt played anybody and when they they lost. Waverly has suffered some losses as well but to extremely talented teams and two of those teams we lost by 7. I still say we win this game by multiple scores. 

That will put the fear in them there Bulldogs. The mite not even show up now!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BulldawgsRise said:

I’m talking about with the team last year. He was talking about how we played for the Waverly game all season last year which isn’t true. Defense wins games and CA looks like they’ve gotten back on track. Waverly May win by a lot but don’t count on it. CA will be coming to play I guarantee it. 

Not a boubt in my mind that CA is going to bring it. I hope those kids and coaches for CA give all they got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rednecktiger31 said:

There's a couple of differences from last year to this year. 1 Waverly is wanting the revenge from being upset by this team last year. 2 CA planned all season for their 1 game against Waverly last year and succeeded while this year CA has been riding the high horse all season long and thinking because they beat the tigers last year they are the better teams this year.

I had actually heard rumors that they were watching Waverly game footage from around week 3 onward last year;  didn't actually know if it was true.  I am glad you cleared that one up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Apache said:

That will put the fear in them there Bulldogs. The mite not even show up now!

 

They will show up Apache. But if I had to guess. I would say Waverly will show up to. I don’t see Waverly backing down from the Middle TN recruiting machine of Columbia Academy. I know, I know y’all don’t recruit every kid has been there since kindergarten. Lmao. It is what it is. May try to come to Columbia next week and watch this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Marion County boys just got two DOGS. Y’all East Robertson folks better buckle your chin straps this year. They gonna have something for Groves up front this year. I’m just keeping it real 
    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
×
  • Create New...