Jump to content

Union City


Bellsburg2
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

Regular season games cancelled due to Covid are recorded as no contest. If it’s a playoff game the team that can’t play must forfeit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

You dont get a win during reg season for cancellations only in playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, crow said:

Regular season games cancelled due to Covid are recorded as no contest. If it’s a playoff game the team that can’t play must forfeit. 

Region games would have to be considered a forfeit/win to get proper seeding for the playoffs. Right?

 

for instance.. Team A finishes 5-1 in region while team B finishes 4-1 but they beat the 5-1 team A in the season.  Team B never got to play team C region team because team C cancelled on them. Head to head could only count between A and B if they have the same record. In that situation team B that never cancelled a game would get screwed because team C cancelled. 

Edited by Pirate2003
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

From TSSAA

The board also tackled how to handle a COVID-19 breakout as it pertains to competition in both the regular and postseason. A regular-season game becomes a win for seeding purposes if the opposing team can’t play due to COVID-19, but the team struck with illness would receive neither a win nor a loss. If both teams confront outbreaks of the virus, it is considered a “no-contest.”

 

According to this, this game will go as a win for UC, and a no-contest for LC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

USJ is not taking LC's spot. USJ is taking the place of one of the Memphis teams that cancelled because they are not playing at all. So there was no win for that game just an open spot which we have filled. Same with our game scheduled now with S. Fulton. It takes the place of the other Memphis school we had scheduled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bellsburg2 said:

UC had their week 1 and 2 games cancelled and has picked up USJ for week 2. I tried to start a conversation about our week 1 matchup, but the DII board is nothing but crickets. Can someone could tell me how the Tornadoes are shaping up this year?

That's really difficult to answer. We have a new coach this year and therefore some changes to the system. I like what I have seen in practice, but that's practice. Generally our number 1's vs our 2's and 3's so how true a picture am I really getting. Without the usual jamborees/scrimmages it's hard to know for sure, especially with a new coach.  I can say they have been working hard and are going to be ready to play. I have no doubt whoever we play will get a hard nosed, all out effort from 1st play to last, and that's all I can ask. How that translates in wins and losses we will just have to wait and see. And I am tired of waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, orngnblk said:

You dont get a win during reg season for cancellations only in playoffs.

 

9 hours ago, LinemanRC said:

From TSSAA

The board also tackled how to handle a COVID-19 breakout as it pertains to competition in both the regular and postseason. A regular-season game becomes a win for seeding purposes if the opposing team can’t play due to COVID-19, but the team struck with illness would receive neither a win nor a loss. If both teams confront outbreaks of the virus, it is considered a “no-contest.”

 

According to this, this game will go as a win for UC, and a no-contest for LC.

So it’s a win for UC but only shows up as a win ONLY IF it becomes the difference for seeding purposes?  So UC could possibly end up with a  10 (+1) - 0 record since they picked up a game in place of the lost COVID game?  Assuming UC actually “plays” a 10 game schedule.  Maybe I’m looking into it too much.  Sorry.  Several folks keep asking me questions I don’t know the answers to so that’s why I’m asking so much.  Potentially UC could end up:

10 (+1) - 0 = 11-0 but COVID “win” isn’t really necessary

or

9 (+1) - 1 = 10-1 for seeding purposes

or

9 (+1) - 0 = 10-0 for seeding purposes

Just looking at several what-ifs and how they could potentially help or hinder a team come playoff time

Edited by PiRaTe._.MiKe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

 

So it’s a win for UC but only shows up as a win ONLY IF it becomes the difference for seeding purposes?  So UC could possibly end up with a  10 (+1) - 0 record since they picked up a game in place of the lost COVID game?  Assuming UC actually “plays” a 10 game schedule.  Maybe I’m looking into it too much.  Sorry.  Several folks keep asking me questions I don’t know the answers to so that’s why I’m asking so much.  Potentially UC could end up:

10 (+1) - 0 = 11-0 but COVID “win” isn’t really necessary

or

9 (+1) - 1 = 10-1 for seeding purposes

or

9 (+1) - 0 = 10-0 for seeding purposes

Just looking at several what-ifs and how they could potentially help or hinder a team come playoff time

The verbiage is a little ambiguous, but I think it goes down as a win regardless of whether there would actually be a tiebreaker circumstance where this (non region) game would have any bearing on playoff seeding. Not sure though. 
     But Union City has not found a replacement game for Lake County, and likely won’t at this late hour. The USJ and South Fulton games are replacements for two Memphis teams later on the schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinemanRC said:

The verbiage is a little ambiguous, but I think it goes down as a win regardless of whether there would actually be a tiebreaker circumstance where this (non region) game would have any bearing on playoff seeding. Not sure though. 
     But Union City has not found a replacement game for Lake County, and likely won’t at this late hour. The USJ and South Fulton games are replacements for two Memphis teams later on the schedule.

Oh ok now I understand the replacement gAmes reasoning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...