Jump to content

USA vs. Morocco


BigG
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I know the US is now ranked in the top 5 or whatever, what i noticed most, outside of the tactical things mentioned before is a lack of passion. I was at the 96 olympics when we surprised argentina before falling and those "kids" had so much energy and just wanted to prove themselves. Some of those guys are now veterans we rely on and we have brought in some great players to make a squad that can contend, my worry is that the last showing in 02 and our recent move into the upper level of national teams will make this team forget how they got to where they are now. We have the players to play, but we can't try to be too pretty. We're good because we work harder and smarter than our opponent. Just my thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they always struggle with teams that play a defending style of soccer and look for the opportunity to counter. It was a wise move to warm up with Morocco since they will play the Czechs and the Czechs will be better at that style and quicker to counter with faster forwards. Hopefully, they learned from the game last night and will be prepared to deal with the Czechs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Reyna may have peaked physically several years ago and his tremendous reputation may be holding back the development of Mastroeni (who, I thought, may have been the best US player last night) and Bobby Convey as an inside player. I just don't think he is the US's best player anymore and I swear Donovan steps up and plays better when he's not in the lineup. I thought Convey brought great energy to the match and I would love to see him move inside like he plays on the younger national team (U-23?), with Beasley and Dempsey outside. I also think Gibbs was adequate at left back but I think Eddie Lewis has more of a presence at that spot. O'Brien has fabulous skills. I hope he can gain match fitness in a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall I was pretty disappointed. The US defense was sufficient (could've been better), but the offense was marginal to say the least. As was mentioned on here before, I believe the US looked a little "gun shy" as well.

the defense was only sufficient because of how much bigger they were than the forwards. it was funny to watch the little forward try to outjump onyewu, but he, and the rest of the defense, seemed a lot slower on full out sprints than i thought they would be. i don't know if anyone else noticed, but it always looked like the moroccan forwards on the back side were open. it was like gibbs and onyewu didn't think it necessary to pay much attention to them. a fast forward with a good touch,much like the ones that will be playing in the world cup :) , could easily get a through ball from the midfield and put it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the defense was only sufficient because of how much bigger they were than the forwards. it was funny to watch the little forward try to outjump onyewu, but he, and the rest of the defense, seemed a lot slower on full out sprints than i thought they would be. i don't know if anyone else noticed, but it always looked like the moroccan forwards on the back side were open. it was like gibbs and onyewu didn't think it necessary to pay much attention to them. a fast forward with a good touch,much like the ones that will be playing in the world cup :) , could easily get a through ball from the midfield and put it away.

 

 

You are right. Onyewu's strength is his size, not his speed, and he did seem a step behind the Moroccan forwards. I think it's safe to say the whole team could use a little improving. But I think we could double our skill and still not get out of our brutal pool. But that's just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...