Jump to content

Gallatin vs. Hillwood


wavelink101
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, as many thought, Gallatin smashed Hillwood tonight. Gallatin's D made a mockery of the Hillwood offense. The Wave D had 4 ints, 3 forced fumbles and a TD. Four different Gallatin players scored a rushing TD, and Hillwood had -47 rushing yards on the night. The only 1st down Hillwood had came with 1.8 seconds left in the game when they fumbled out of bounds. They even had a rough time moving the ball on the Gallatin 3rd team defense.

 

Final: Gallatin 42 Hillwood 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gallatin has yet to give up a point this season, but if you haven't seen the defense play the goose-eggs aren't as impressive as the performance on the field. The D is consistently hitting ball carriers in the backfield, especially QBs.

I'm not sure what all the stats are, but I'm going to guess that they've given up somewhere between 175-250 total yards in these first two games.

 

Beech should be a little better test next week, but they lost Friday night to Kenwood(?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a defensive clinic!!!! Gallatin's defense was incredible compared to the overmatched Hillwood team. Hillwood was one of the weakest 5-A schools that I have ever seen. Or maybe we just made them look that way....which ever the case Hillwood could never get on track. When they attempted a pass, they were heavily pressured. When they ran, they were met at or behind the line of scrimmage. Gallatin still needs to work on the offense. While they were given short field postion several times, Gallatin needs to work on the long sustaining drives. But we were definitely more crisp blocking tonight with at least 6 different runningbacks and 4 different quarterbacks getting to play. We also went 3 deep in the line. One can only hope that the Toppers can get things right to avoid a winless season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were plently that could make a tackle, especially since most of the guys played and were starters on that playoff team. It was just a big difference in the jump to 5-A. And by the way, Hilltopper did not play for the 12-1 team. He sat out that year.

 

 

Wow Janeti, you are absolutely mistaken. I've been gone all weekend & just saw your post about hilltopper, & I decided to post myself even though he already did.

 

I'm taking up for him because you are a dummy. If you knew ANYTHING, you would know that he played that WHOLE season. But apparently not.

 

He was one of most valuble players that year & was an asset to the Hillwood team.

 

Have a great day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Again with the Sensitivity!!!!!!!! No wonder Hillwood was so bad last year. If the players spew out the escuses you've been spewing out, then Hillwood has no hope. They are doomed before they start. Some teams are just over matched. Hillwood just can't match up against Gallatin, much less anyone else in the Region. Man up and just take this one on the chin! No contest GALLATIN ROLLS!

 

HillTopper- Metro Football fans are like the Metro Teams, "They always talk the talk, but really never walk the walk."

Wait a minute now, I dont remember Gallatin getting early tickets to the Bluecross bowl either now, so dont be talking about metro like you all are Maryville or somebody good or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...