redraider0185 Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 What happened to Alex Ward? Didn't make weight. Reports are that he was .2 over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbody Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 In the high school tiebreak rules, all six-pointers are created equal. Assuming there were no coach's table warnings or match-point unsportsmanlikes, you would look at the first score in each match, and the greater sum would win. (Under NCAA rules, on the other hand, Baylor would win because once you've considered all the sixes, fives, and fours, the next step is forfeits above all other sixes.) Just for you Silver: The HS rule: ART. 2 . . . In dual-meet competition, if teams have identical scores, the following team tie-breaking system shall be used to determine the winner. a. The team whose opposing wrestlers or team has been penalized the greater number of team points for flagrant or unsportsmanlike conduct shall be declared the winner. b. The team whose opposing wrestlers or team personnel has been penalized the greater number of team point deductions shall be declared the winner. c. The team whose opposing wrestlers were penalized the greater number of match points for unsportsmanlike conduct during a match shall be declared the winner. d. The team having won the greater number of matches (including forfeits) shall be declared the winner. e. The team having accumulated the greater total number of falls, defaults, forfeits and disqualifications shall be declared the winner. f. The team having the greater number of technical falls shall be declared the winner. g. The team having the greater number of major decisions shall be declared the winner. h. The team having the greater number (total match points) of first-point(s) scored shall be declared the winner. i. The team having the greater number of points for near-falls shall be declared the winner. j. The team having the greater number of takedowns shall be declared the winner. k. The team having the greater number of reversals shall be declared the winner. l. The team having the greater number of escapes shall be declared the winner. m. The team whose opponent has been penalized the greater number of points for stalling. n. The team whose opponent has been warned more often for stalling. o. The team whose opponent has the greater number of points for all other infractions (i.e. false starts). p. If none of the above resolves the tie, a flip of a disk will determine the winner. Upon determining the winning team by use of the tiebreaking system, a single team point shall be added to the prevailing team. The method of recording the score in breaking team ties shall be the score followed by the letter of the criterion that broke the tie (e.g. Team A-16; Team B-17, criterion e). The college rule: 3.12 Breaking Team Ties in Dual-Meet Advancement Tournaments When two teams finish in a tie in a dual-meet advancement tournament, the following criteria shall be applied to determine a winner: 3.12.1 Greater number of victories. 3.12.2 Greater number of six-point victories (including falls, forfeits, defaults and disqualifications). 3.12.3 Greater number of five-point technical falls. 3.12.4 Greater number of four-point technical falls. 3.12.5 Greater number of major decisions. 3.12.6 Fewest number of matches forfeited. 3.12.7 Greater number of total near-fall points earned. (This should include additional points earned for excessive bleeding or injury when near-fall points are awarded). 3.12.8 Greater number of takedowns. 3.12.9 Greater number of reversals. 3.12.10 Greater number of escapes. 3.12.11 Greater number of riding-time points. 3.12.12 Greater number of stalling points. 3.12.13 Colored disc toss. One team point shall be awarded to the team winning by criteria. The method of recording the score in breaking team ties shall be the score followed by the number of criteria that broke the tie (e.g., Team A 17, Team B 16, criterion 3.12.5.) In regular-season dual-meet competition, team ties shall not be broken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckLateral Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 In the high school tiebreak rules, all six-pointers are created equal. ............................Just for you Silver: The HS rule: ART. 2 . . . In dual-meet competition, if teams have identical scores, the following team tie-breaking system shall be used to determine the winner. a. The team whose opposing wrestlers or team has been penalized the greater number of team points for flagrant or unsportsmanlike conduct shall be declared the winner. b. The team whose opposing wrestlers or team personnel has been penalized the greater number of team point deductions shall be declared the winner. c. The team whose opposing wrestlers were penalized the greater number of match points for unsportsmanlike conduct during a match shall be declared the winner. d. The team having won the greater number of matches (including forfeits) shall be declared the winner. e. The team having accumulated the greater total number of falls, defaults, forfeits and disqualifications shall be declared the winner. f. The team having the greater number of technical falls shall be declared the winner. g. The team having the greater number of major decisions shall be declared the winner. h. The team having the greater number (total match points) of first-point(s) scored shall be declared the winner. i. The team having the greater number of points for near-falls shall be declared the winner. j. The team having the greater number of takedowns shall be declared the winner. k. The team having the greater number of reversals shall be declared the winner. l. The team having the greater number of escapes shall be declared the winner. m. The team whose opponent has been penalized the greater number of points for stalling. n. The team whose opponent has been warned more often for stalling. o. The team whose opponent has the greater number of points for all other infractions (i.e. false starts). p. If none of the above resolves the tie, a flip of a disk will determine the winner. Upon determining the winning team by use of the tiebreaking system, a single team point shall be added to the prevailing team. The method of recording the score in breaking team ties shall be the score followed by the letter of the criterion that broke the tie (e.g. Team A-16; Team B-17, criterion e). .............................................................. Then under Silverpie's "all six-pointers are equal" criteria, it looks like Baylor would still have won had Duncan been able to get the extra two team points awarded for a pin at 152 and the score ended at 38-38. There were no a., b. or c. For d., matches were even at 7-7. Move to e. and each had 3 falls, each had one injury default, but Baylor had the only forfeit. So, in the event the match had been tied at the end, it looks like the forfeit at 112 would have decided the match for Baylor. Thankfully, due to the the Baylor 152 avoiding getting pinned by Duncan, it did not have come to that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chattcity Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Great match, 38-36 Baylor. 12 point swing when Helton gets pinned by Satterfield. Watson gets hurt in warmups and McCallie gets a tech at 119. Another 11 point swing. Elsea can't make weight. Clements beats Cate is a pick'em match. McCallie need pins in the last 3 matches (152, 161, 171) TJ Duncan can't pull the pin on Spencer Craig so Baylor wins 38-36 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckLateral Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Great match, 38-37 Baylor. 12 point swing when Helton gets pinned by Satterfield. Watson gets hurt in warmups and McCallie gets a tech at 119. Another 10 point swing. Elsea can't make weight. Clements beats Cate is a pick'em match. McCallie need pins in the last 3 matches (152, 161, 171) TJ Duncan can't pull the pin on Spencer Craig so Baylor wins 38-37 Chatt: The two McCallie announcers on the webcast said that it was Ward who did not make weight for McCallie at 112-------that he was .2 over. Was it Ward or Elsea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverpie Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 In the high school tiebreak rules, all six-pointers are created eThen under Silverpie's "all six-pointers are equal" criteria, it looks like Baylor would still have won had Duncan been able to get the extra two team points awarded for a pin at 152 and the score ended at 38-38. There were no a., b. or c. For d., matches were even at 7-7. Move to e. and each had 3 falls, each had one injury default, but Baylor had the only forfeit. So, in the event the match had been tied at the end, it looks like the forfeit at 112 would have decided the match for Baylor. Thankfully, due to the the Baylor 152 avoiding getting pinned by Duncan, it did not have come to that. No, that would have been McCallie's 4th pin. Both teams would have had five sixes, a five, and a three, so you'd be in the deep end of the tiebreakers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decoy76 Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Who is going to give props to ymotme. For his prediction of Baylor's new stud Deckelman????? If that was his prediction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnlonghorn Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Who is going to give props to ymotme. For his prediction of Baylor's new stud Deckelman????? If that was his prediction? That wasnt his prediction. He didnt know about that little twist of fate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosierdad Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Great match tonight between two great teams. McCallie is certainly coming back into the mix as far as who is at the top. Just an observation: McCallie wrestles a backup at 103 lbs possibly due to an injury, McCallie forfeits at 112 lbs because Ward does not make weight, Baylor Watson appears to be hurt and does not wrestle, Baylor wrestles an 8th grader at 125 lbs and looks great, Baylor Manley moves to 130 lbs and wins, McCallie 135 lbs Hooker comes down down from 140 lbs and pins, Baylor Hayes is hurt and possibly done for the year, Baylor heavyweight takes down McCallie heavyweight 10 seconds into the match and leaves hurt. Can anybody remember a year where so many wrestlers get hurt during the season? Baylor is already missing a star member in Trey Stravrum. Baylor is now missing 2 star members of their team and possibly a 3rd, McCallie is missing 1 and possibly 2 now. It appears the top teams are moving back into the pack. Where does this leave Ryan, Christian Brothers and MBA? What are their injuries or do they have any? I have never seen anything like this. I know that you have to fight through adversity, but I do not remember a year like this where so many good wrestlers get hurt during the season. I really feel for Cole Hayes as this could be the 2nd year that he misses the state tournament due to something at the end of the year. Great kid and great family. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnlonghorn Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 What a match! What strange events. Watson geting hurt, Cole Hayes hurt, the big pin at 215 for the Blue, Ward not making weight at 112. McCallies 103 lbers not bumping to 112. Is there more to that story? Maybe injuries? I am really suprised Baylor won this with Watson, Hayes, Stavrum, Pinkstaff and Shuford all out of the line up and the suprise win at 215. Not trying to toot their horn but this team would have been one of the best ever without the injuries. The 125 lber Deckelman is an 8th grader and he looked great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnlonghorn Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Great match tonight between two great teams. McCallie is certainly coming back into the mix as far as who is at the top. Just an observation: McCallie wrestles a backup at 103 lbs possibly due to an injury, McCallie forfeits at 112 lbs because Ward does not make weight, Baylor Watson appears to be hurt and does not wrestle, Baylor wrestles an 8th grader at 125 lbs and looks great, Baylor Manley moves to 130 lbs and wins, McCallie 135 lbs Hooker comes down down from 140 lbs and pins, Baylor Hayes is hurt and possibly done for the year, Baylor heavyweight takes down McCallie heavyweight 10 seconds into the match and leaves hurt. Can anybody remember a year where so many wrestlers get hurt during the season? Baylor is already missing a star member in Trey Stravrum. Baylor is now missing 2 star members of their team and possibly a 3rd, McCallie is missing 1 and possibly 2 now. It appears the top teams are moving back into the pack. Where does this leave Ryan, Christian Brothers and MBA? What are their injuries or do they have any? I have never seen anything like this. I know that you have to fight through adversity, but I do not remember a year like this where so many good wrestlers get hurt during the season. I really feel for Cole Hayes as this could be the 2nd year that he misses the state tournament due to something at the end of the year. Great kid and great family. Baylor is missing much more than that. They are missing Watson, Stavrum, Hayes, Pinkstaff and Shuford. 5 studs. Terrible, terrible luck this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckLateral Posted February 2, 2010 Report Share Posted February 2, 2010 Who is going to give props to ymotme. For his prediction of Baylor's new stud Deckelman????? If that was his prediction? Decoy: Ynotme The Renegade's prediction was that Clements vs Cate would be the best match. I recognized him for that earlier. He called that one right. Ynotme is a contender not a pretender. The "Baylor's new stud" ( a/k/a Sidd Finch) prediction was from tnlonghorn but he has yet to come forward and claim that Deckelman is who he was talking about. That may be because he described someone who as of Friday still had some eligibility issues that had to be resolved while Deckelman wrestled on Thursday as part of a Baylor JV squad that won 13 out of 20 matches with McCallie. However, Deckleman did look pretty studly in getting a 20-3 tech fall for Baylor in his match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.