Jump to content

2A play offs


reaction
 Share

Recommended Posts

RedRage, I didn't see your response. Pretty disappointed in your post. You and I both know that Quad 4 is much more competitive and I have been ragging the Cards about the cupcake walk to the semis. It is a cupcake walk compared to what Trenton Peabody, Mitchell, TCA or Huntingdon will have. Two of the teams in that quad have been beaten by AVille by 30 points or more. That's no disrespect it's just a fact.

Mission accomplished !!! .......... Pot stirred ! 😜😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really depends on if Boyd goes quad one or if mtcs or forrest goes to three. In two you have a possibility of Mc trousdale forrest Boyd mtcs Whitwell Jackson co? And their May be more that I'm not sure of.

With Boyd winning their District, they will likely remain in their natural quad.  The way things stand, there will be 3 teams shifting east from Quad 4 (likely not that many after next week).  That would put 2 teams out of Quad 3 into Quad 2.  Whitwell and Jackson County would likely end up in Quad 1 as a result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Boyd winning their District, they will likely remain in their natural quad.  The way things stand, there will be 3 teams shifting east from Quad 4 (likely not that many after next week).  That would put 2 teams out of Quad 3 into Quad 2.  Whitwell and Jackson County would likely end up in Quad 1 as a result. 

Who do you think Whitwell might be playing in this sceniro?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Boyd winning their District, they will likely remain in their natural quad. The way things stand, there will be 3 teams shifting east from Quad 4 (likely not that many after next week). That would put 2 teams out of Quad 3 into Quad 2. Whitwell and Jackson County would likely end up in Quad 1 as a result.

Quads are not picked by seeding or record ! Only from east to west ! T$$AA starts in in Q 1 sets six from the most eastern point and moves to next Quad !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quads are not picked by seeding or record ! Only from east to west ! T$$AA starts in in Q 1 sets six from the most eastern point and moves to next Quad !

I didn't say they were.  However, there will never be more than 6 teams in their natural quad.  As the current map shows, there are 9 in quad 4. There would be 6 teams in Quad 4 which is their natural quad. Quad 1 would have 5 natural quad teams and 1 from Quad 2. 

 

Edit:  Winning the District will anchor a team in their natural quad and finishing 2nd will help anchor them there.  It comes down to a combination of geography AND seeding for the at large teams and where they end up. 

Edited by rlh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest hevyrevy1611

Yeah, this system's playoff set-up is crazy confusing. The new plan coming, in spite of its faults, there will be a better, easier to figure out playoff scheme. Don't know about who wins Quad 1 & 2 this year in 2A, but imo it's TCA & Adamsville who are frontrunners to be other two in final four. We'll soon see!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say they were.  However, there will never be more than 6 teams in their natural quad.  As the current map shows, there are 9 in quad 4. There would be 6 teams in Quad 4 which is their natural quad. Quad 1 would have 5 natural quad teams and 1 from Quad 2. 

 

Edit:  Winning the District will anchor a team in their natural quad and finishing 2nd will help anchor them there.  It comes down to a combination of geography AND seeding for the at large teams and where they end up. 

This is simply not true.  The TSSAA will place teams in playoff quads based on geography.  Seeding and where you finish in a district have nothing to do with it.

Edited by ReitzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, this system's playoff set-up is crazy confusing. The new plan coming, in spite of its faults, there will be a better, easier to figure out playoff scheme. Don't know about who wins Quad 1 & 2 this year in 2A, but imo it's TCA & Adamsville who are frontrunners to be other two in final four. We'll soon see!

I agree that our current playoff plan can be confusing at times if you don't have a good grasp of what is going on.  It may be confusing but it has people talking and that generates more interest.  Next years plan will be boring and in many years presenting the same matchups in the first round year after year.  Very boring and very predictable. It will also result in lower gates and playoff fields that will be severely watered down in 1A and 2A from what we now currently enjoy with the Z plan.  Next years playoff plan is alot like our current educational system.  It's being dumbed down so more can understand and participate.  The TSSAA is basically saying to heck with a quality playoff field.  We want more numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is simply not true.  The TSSAA will place teams in playoff quads without regards to geography or district finish.  

 District Champions will in fact be in their natural quads.  In most cases so will 2nd place teams, especially if the District champ is a 1a team meaning they end up in the 1a bracket.

Edited by rlh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say they were. However, there will never be more than 6 teams in their natural quad. As the current map shows, there are 9 in quad 4. There would be 6 teams in Quad 4 which is their natural quad. Quad 1 would have 5 natural quad teams and 1 from Quad 2.

 

Edit: Winning the District will anchor a team in their natural quad and finishing 2nd will help anchor them there. It comes down to a combination of geography AND seeding for the at large teams and where they end up.

Two years ago Adamsville was district champs and moved to quad 3. Last year Adamsville was district runner up and was moved to Quad 3. Where you finish in district doesn't necessarily mean you will be in your natural quad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...