Jump to content

2017 Enrollment Numbers and Classifications


MountainTroll
 Share

Recommended Posts

Up is the only way movement happens. No one moves down.

If this is true then it is a stupid rule. In pretty much every class we are talking about 1 or 2 total students being the difference from the highest enrollment in a class to the lowest enrollment in a class. Whoever makes these rules in TSSAA needs my help in a bad way. Consider this my application. Edited by LazIndexTN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true then it is a stupid rule. In pretty much every class we are talking about 1 or 2 total students being the difference from the highest enrollment in a class to the lowest enrollment in a class. Whoever makes these rules in TSSAA needs my help in a bad way. Consider this my application.

You open another can of worms if you allowed a team to move down.

 

Imagine the largest 1A team decides to move up. And every team in 2A doesn't want to move down except the largest 2A team.

Why separate 1A and 2A at all if the largest 2A can be grouped with 1A?

 

Do I think this scenario would play out?  Probably not. But it's a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true then it is a stupid rule. In pretty much every class we are talking about 1 or 2 total students being the difference from the highest enrollment in a class to the lowest enrollment in a class. Whoever makes these rules in TSSAA needs my help in a bad way. Consider this my application

I don't think the cutoffs will be set between schools that are that close...they will leave schools that close in enrollments in same class unless one of them requests to move up. I do think that some of the cutoffs will be adjusted to account for some district alignment issues that they may be facing, as well as to accommodate some teams already stated desires to move up (i.e. Elizabethton).  I had posted earlier that I thought Harriman would be the largest 1A school, but I wouldn't be surprised if they end up in 2A in order to balance the travel out for the some of the districts in that part of the state.

 

It's obviously just a fun guessing game for now until more info comes out, but I do think the TSSAA is more sensitive to close enrollment numbers at the cutoff points than people think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • TSSAA will let them all go to Mase.
    • Well nothing new, the Mustangs are really talented again this coming season!  They very well could go undefeated in regular season.  We shall see what happens in postseason.  I think the path to state title game is a little clearer than years past.  I think the Stangs are going to be really good and I think the traditional teams around in 2A are not going to be as strong.  It should be a fun season!
    • I would not put too much stock into the UH over Eagleville. From what I understand they were pretty banged up in that tourney. Catcher was out, they were throwing pretty deep in their bullpen and a few key players were beat up in their infield. Sounds like they are pretty healthy heading into the district tournament. Look at their schedule, they played some really good teams. 
    • What do we need to do to help with Mr. Basketball?  
    • With June camps right around the corner, how are programs looking, reloading, any notable underclass coming in? 
×
  • Create New...