Battle of the Bridge; AC vs Clinton

[DevilMan03]

53 minutes ago, SweetScience said:

Good thing it wasn't Gillum who hit him. If it was, he wouldn't have gotten back up, best believe that. The guy probably would've just spent the night on the cold hard ground. Gillum has 1 punch knockout power, especially with the Letterman jacket on or nearby. Biggest bada!# preacher I've ever seen. 

When he wore that jacket to Greeneville everyone laughed. So dumb 

[SweetScience]

11 minutes ago, DevilMan03 said:

When he wore that jacket to Greeneville everyone laughed. So dumb 

Re-living his glory days Dev haha

[budkilmer]

3 minutes ago, SweetScience said:

Re-living his glory days Dev haha

I'm just glad someone can fit in theirs. Mine was too small a long time ago. 

Edited September 12, 2018 by budkilmer

[SweetScience]

2 minutes ago, budkilmer said:

I'm just glad someone can fit in theirs. Mine was too small a long time ago. 

I know. Amazing, huh? I would bet he had it re-sized.

[DevilMan03]

13 minutes ago, SweetScience said:

I know. Amazing, huh? I would bet he had it re-sized.

No it’s Stanton Martins lol I mean he is “Peyton Manning” says Gillum lol welp Peyton stunk it up against the Devils 3 years in a row 

[SweetScience]

9 minutes ago, DevilMan03 said:

No it’s Stanton Martins lol I mean he is “Peyton Manning” says Gillum lol welp Peyton stunk it up against the Devils 3 years in a row 

Is it really Stanton's? OMFG

[DevilMan03]

2 minutes ago, SweetScience said:

Is it really Stanton's? OMFG

Probably is lol 

[SweetScience]

33 minutes ago, DevilMan03 said:

Probably is lol 

Haha

[vol9er]

FYI, I heard That same star player was flagged a few times during the game for after the play activity. I'm not condoning a cheep shot, but sometimes you get what's coming to ya,  KARMA is a B!. And so is AC's athletic director. Would someone please tell GT he's to short to be on the sidelines or even better send him to the alternative school for his much deserved RVP smurf spot on the kitchen staff  . He's as classless as he is short. And last but not least the New Water boy for the Mavs Teddy Phillips. Would someone do this poor guy a favor and stop taking his free power wash donations and gamble money offers in exchange for a team colored collard shirt, and a sideline spot next to the water coolers. SMH. News flash, there's a reason he's journeyed to at least 12 schools now in 12 years, he couldn't spell the word coaching let alone actually coach. Roids and Viagra are a bad combo, ask T.P. 

I have no issue with AC starters playing the whole game, that's a Head Coaching decision that can have a risk/reward outcome. Clinton cant be mad nor do I really think they were, But AC coaches cant get mad if one of their key players gets hurt or not. That's the risk/reward outcome I was referring to. In a rival game, where tempers are already on edge, no way would I have my starters in up 30. I played in the Powell vs Halls rival game and believe me I know all about some cheap shots and dirty playing. If Powell EVER tried to embarrass me; well I'm taking someone out, night night, better have your head on a swivel.

#HallsRD#MISSYAOLDMANKERR#WAGGLE@8#

[ACMAVSTIME]

11 hours ago, RamTough41 said:

McKamey said that's what you get when you have your starters in in the 4th quarter. He wasn't justifying a "cheap shot". He was saying as the winning coach, if you're up big in the late quarters and you keep your starters in then he can't sub either. It should never of happened. The winning coach is always the first to sub then losing coach can. Neither coach should want to risk hurting a starter late in a lopsided game. If one team is running up the score to prove a point, then what happens is not in the other coaches hands. That's my opinion only.

No that is not what he meant. This situation would have never escalated had he not tried to use that statement as an excuse to what more and more looks to have been escalated due to the head coach of Clinton. Does not make sense either. Mavs were winning and had nothing to lose on the other hand Clinton had nothing to lose but a lot to gain. And knowing the coaching staff at AC that bucket of thought does not hold water. AC has a great coaching staff; this is completely out of character.

[DevilMan03]

1 hour ago, ACMAVSTIME said:

No that is not what he meant. This situation would have never escalated had he not tried to use that statement as an excuse to what more and more looks to have been escalated due to the head coach of Clinton. Does not make sense either. Mavs were winning and had nothing to lose on the other hand Clinton had nothing to lose but a lot to gain. And knowing the coaching staff at AC that bucket of thought does not hold water. AC has a great coaching staff; this is completely out of character.

“GREAT” coaching staffs don’t do what they did. 

[92Dragon]

11 hours ago, oridgecat said:

C'mon 92, don't go there.  We already have AC/CC won't play and you know that is bs.  Now, no Clinton and AC! What?  The bottom line here is that the adults involved need to grow up and handle their business like the professionals they are paid to be.  The kids are the ones that suffer, they should be allowed to play these games and make these memories.  

Just for a couple of years, yes I do.