Jump to content

5 class plan


ocac
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am hearing from some reliable sources that the 5 class plan is gaining some momentum.  I know another thread addressed this issue a couple of weeks ago, but I am starting a new thread to hear thoughts and opinions.  How will that affect the teams that are teetering on the high/low side of enrollment for each class?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should school size enter into this discussion at all?       We hear this all the time, it isn't "fair" for Unaka (337) to have to compete against the schools with 2000+ kids like Science Hill and Dobyns Bennett.    But then along comes Alcoa (635) and Greeneville (914) who regularly stomp most 6A schools more than twice their size.     Should we really be trying to find a single state champion across the board?      Or is the T-ball mentality (everybody's a winner, everybody gets a trophy) just too hard-baked into out culture now?       How about having 95 state champions (one for each county)?      What if we had a single champion from the 3 natural divisions of the state (east, middle, west)?     So many ways to slice and dice it......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, blazer1set said:

Should school size enter into this discussion at all?       We hear this all the time, it isn't "fair" for Unaka (337) to have to compete against the schools with 2000+ kids like Science Hill and Dobyns Bennett.    But then along comes Alcoa (635) and Greeneville (914) who regularly stomp most 6A schools more than twice their size.     Should we really be trying to find a single state champion across the board?      Or is the T-ball mentality (everybody's a winner, everybody gets a trophy) just too hard-baked into out culture now?       How about having 95 state champions (one for each county)?      What if we had a single champion from the 3 natural divisions of the state (east, middle, west)?     So many ways to slice and dice it......

Those 2 have the same team size as those other schools

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The discussion to lower the number of classes for football is so they don't have to add any for other sports bickering about only having 3 who want to move up to 4 (Softball, basketball, baseball... etc..). So if they can get it down to 5 they can point to the other sports and say they're addressing the inequality. 

Doing separate classifications by sport is dumb though. Red Bank (798 Students) plays 3A Football (Schools up 820 is or so), 2A Basketball/Baseball/Softball (Schools up to 1000 or so), but in track and cross country they are classified as a "Large School" (Up to 2700+). 

Most states have blanket classifications... if you have this many kids you are in this class for all sports. In that case, i think 4 blanket classes would be ideal for the state. 

A - 0 to 323 Students

AA - 324 to 706

AAA - 707 to 1150

AAAA - 1151 to 2700

In sports like Soccer, Tennis, Golf, Cross Country you can still combine A and AA into one class as needed as most are right now. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BoomKing2006 said:

The discussion to lower the number of classes for football is so they don't have to add any for other sports bickering about only having 3 who want to move up to 4 (Softball, basketball, baseball... etc..). So if they can get it down to 5 they can point to the other sports and say they're addressing the inequality. 

Doing separate classifications by sport is dumb though. Red Bank (798 Students) plays 3A Football (Schools up 820 is or so), 2A Basketball/Baseball/Softball (Schools up to 1000 or so), but in track and cross country they are classified as a "Large School" (Up to 2700+). 

Most states have blanket classifications... if you have this many kids you are in this class for all sports. In that case, i think 4 blanket classes would be ideal for the state. 

A - 0 to 323 Students

AA - 324 to 706

AAA - 707 to 1150

AAAA - 1151 to 2700

In sports like Soccer, Tennis, Golf, Cross Country you can still combine A and AA into one class as needed as most are right now. 

 

This would be a brilliant plan!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BoomKing2006 said:

The discussion to lower the number of classes for football is so they don't have to add any for other sports bickering about only having 3 who want to move up to 4 (Softball, basketball, baseball... etc..). So if they can get it down to 5 they can point to the other sports and say they're addressing the inequality. 

Doing separate classifications by sport is dumb though. Red Bank (798 Students) plays 3A Football (Schools up 820 is or so), 2A Basketball/Baseball/Softball (Schools up to 1000 or so), but in track and cross country they are classified as a "Large School" (Up to 2700+). 

Most states have blanket classifications... if you have this many kids you are in this class for all sports. In that case, i think 4 blanket classes would be ideal for the state. 

A - 0 to 323 Students

AA - 324 to 706

AAA - 707 to 1150

AAAA - 1151 to 2700

In sports like Soccer, Tennis, Golf, Cross Country you can still combine A and AA into one class as needed as most are right now. 

 

Just a thought/question...isn’t putting schools with 1,200 students up against schools with over 2,000 students completely unfair?? It seems like a huge disadvantage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sportsguy22 said:

Just a thought/question...isn’t putting schools with 1,200 students up against schools with over 2,000 students completely unfair?? It seems like a huge disadvantage.

maybe talk to every Track/Cross Country/Golf/Tennis Coach in the state where there are two divisions... 760 and below and 760 and above. 

1200 students up to over 2000 is more equitable than 760 up to over 2000. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BoomKing2006 said:

maybe talk to every Track/Cross Country/Golf/Tennis Coach in the state where there are two divisions... 760 and below and 760 and above. 

1200 students up to over 2000 is more equitable than 760 up to over 2000. 

For football and the numbers/depth it takes, that is a huge gap, especially compared to other classes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, blazer1set said:

Should school size enter into this discussion at all?       We hear this all the time, it isn't "fair" for Unaka (337) to have to compete against the schools with 2000+ kids like Science Hill and Dobyns Bennett.    But then along comes Alcoa (635) and Greeneville (914) who regularly stomp most 6A schools more than twice their size.     Should we really be trying to find a single state champion across the board?      Or is the T-ball mentality (everybody's a winner, everybody gets a trophy) just too hard-baked into out culture now?       How about having 95 state champions (one for each county)?      What if we had a single champion from the 3 natural divisions of the state (east, middle, west)?     So many ways to slice and dice it......

You get teams like Gordonsville & Whitwell with bad records who stomped schools with great records so records mean nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...