SportsTNFan Posted January 22 Report Share Posted January 22 6 minutes ago, FR615 said: I really can’t say until it comes out. It’s in the meat of the lineup and two that were practically locks for state titles. That’s unfortunate. So, for those of us who will be in attendance for the Baylor/McCallie dual match we will see when they are not on the bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FR615 Posted January 22 Author Report Share Posted January 22 1 minute ago, SportsTNFan said: That’s unfortunate. So, for those of us who will be in attendance for the Baylor/McCallie dual match we will see when they are not on the bench. Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whoweft Posted January 22 Report Share Posted January 22 39 minutes ago, Whoweft said: I hope you are correct, but I think McCallie will need a couple of more Baylor kids to get kicked out/disciplined for that to be correct (this year). I should have worded this better. I don't want any kids to get in trouble. My point was, Baylor is so far ahead of McCallie that I could not see how two kids missing the dual would change the result. I expect that if Baylor is not permitting two of its expected state champions to wrestle McCallie, it must be a serious matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobrakid8 Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, FR615 said: I really can’t say until it comes out. It’s in the meat of the lineup and two that were practically locks for state titles. Wonder if Knox and Cleveland will text and try and setup a last minute dual? 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FargoStrut Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Whoweft said: I should have worded this better. I don't want any kids to get in trouble. My point was, Baylor is so far ahead of McCallie that I could not see how two kids missing the dual would change the result. I expect that if Baylor is not permitting two of its expected state champions to wrestle McCallie, it must be a serious matter. Weft, I honestly think it would've been a closer match than what you're giving McCallie credit for. Here's why I say that. I think McCallie should win at lower couple weights and upper few weights with relative ease.? McCallie also possibly wins another weight class or perhaps 2 depending on the flip/lineups. Baylor would have been favored and expected to dominate through the middle of the lineup and the McCallie's kids jobs would have been to limit bonus points for Baylor. When you take away expected bonus points in two matches and possibly give up bonus in those 2 matches of a "somewhat" close dual, it very well could be the difference between winning and losing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FR615 Posted January 23 Author Report Share Posted January 23 (edited) 1 hour ago, FargoStrut said: Weft, I honestly think it would've been a closer match than what you're giving McCallie credit for. Here's why I say that. I think McCallie should win at lower couple weights and upper few weights with relative ease.? McCallie also possibly wins another weight class or perhaps 2 depending on the flip/lineups. Baylor would have been favored and expected to dominate through the middle of the lineup and the McCallie's kids jobs would have been to limit bonus points for Baylor. When you take away expected bonus points in two matches and possibly give up bonus in those 2 matches of a "somewhat" close dual, it very well could be the difference between winning and losing. This match could have gone either way with full lineups… slight edge to Baylor. McCallie should win by 15-20 now. Edited January 23 by FR615 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowcatcherII Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 3 hours ago, FR615 said: I really can’t say until it comes out. It’s in the meat of the lineup and two that were practically locks for state titles. I mean if it’s in the meat of the lineup and two lock state champs, process of elimination would tell you it’s gotta be Askew, Sturgill, or Norman… guess time will tell for sure. This would drastically change the D2 landscape if true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTreyB Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 Mccallie was gonna win with the two Baylor kids in the lineup. But losing them really really hurts them. And yeah I know who they are also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTreyB Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 Rex will really dodge Knox now. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTreyB Posted January 23 Report Share Posted January 23 30 minutes ago, cowcatcherII said: I mean if it’s in the meat of the lineup and two lock state champs, process of elimination would tell you it’s gotta be Askew, Sturgill, or Norman… guess time will tell for sure. This would drastically change the D2 landscape if true. It’s not two of those three. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FR615 Posted January 23 Author Report Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, TheTreyB said: Rex will really dodge Knox now. lol Let’s keep this about the Baylor Mccallie match. Stay in your thread. Nobody cares what you think. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FR615 Posted January 23 Author Report Share Posted January 23 4 minutes ago, TheTreyB said: It’s not two of those three. You gonna release the names? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.