Jump to content

This Thread is Too Funny


itzme
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The point is, we're hearing all kinds of cries to punish private schools because they can get students from anywhere (even if they don't), but not to punish those public schools that have the same potential.

Thats not correct. Most posters who haven't really followed the debate or followed press releases from the TSSAA and such do not know that the issue of open zones and urbans schools are being considered in the same breath as the privates. The Virginia Plan/Plan Z are an attempt to address these issues both public and private.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not correct. Most posters who haven't really followed the debate or followed press releases from the TSSAA and such do not know that the issue of open zones and urbans schools are being considered in the same breath as the privates. The Virginia Plan/Plan Z are an attempt to address these issues both public and private.

The point silverpie makes is essentially correct, beethoven, because the multipliers proposed are higher for private schools than they are for open zoned publics. Since the battle cry of the publics for a split is the ability pf the private schools to get players from anywhere, the multiplier for open zoned publics should be the same.

 

The discussion on the football board linked here by itzme in his post above, proves what everyone has known for a long time. Many public schools, not just Maryville, have the ability to get student athletes from other zones admitted to their schools. This activity is not illegal, but it renders the rhetoric of many of the public supporters as open hypocricy. Here is the smoking gun at a high profile public program that all of you have tried to discount for the past two years.

 

Kudos to Volgen for his tireless commentary on this issue. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point silverpie makes is essentially correct, beethoven, because the multipliers proposed are higher for private schools than they are for open zoned publics. Since the battle cry of the publics for a split is the ability pf the private schools to get players from anywhere, the multiplier for open zoned publics should be the same.

 

The discussion on the football board linked here by itzme in his post above, proves what everyone has known for a long time. Many public schools, not just Maryville, have the ability to get student athletes from other zones admitted to their schools. This activity is not illegal, but it renders the rhetoric of many of the public supporters as open hypocricy. Here is the smoking gun at a high profile public program that all of you have tried to discount for the past two years.

 

Kudos to Volgen for his tireless commentary on this issue. ;)

True but, I've heard grumblings of an Urban only multiplier which would encompass nearly all of the private schools anyway. It also wouldn't hurt Maryville to go play 5A. Riverdale needs the competition on that side of the bracket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another example of the good programs getting the best players whether they are public or private. No matter how you slice it up there will never be a level playing field. Virginia, kentucky, alaska, it doesn't matter what the plan, someone will always be dominant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...