Jump to content

1A Playoffs. TSSAA got it wrong.


croz6110
 Share

Recommended Posts

Clay County misses out because their of the three-way tie in the standings. Monterey wins the three-way tiebreaker and gets an automatic bid. the head-to-head win for Clay County doesn't matter in the three-way scenario. Unless TSSAA has their overall or district records wrong.

Jackson Co. is part of that three way tie, but they're 2A. And TSSAA had Clay listed as an automatic qualifier if FC beat Monterey, which they did.

 

 

I know JC is 2A, but playoff qualifiers are determined by final district standings as a whole. When the three-way tie is broken, Monterey finishes above Clay County and gets an automatic bid. TSSAA had the scenario wrong. They also had the scenario wrong in District 4-A when they said both Coalfield and Sunbright could earn automatic bids this week with wins because only one would get the automatic berth. I have called TSSAA in the past to report problems in their scenarios for teams in my area. Unfortunately, it seems no one caught this one before the brackets were released. But the way I see it is Monterey gets the automatic bid unless someone's overall record or district record is wrong. Again, I could be wrong because I don't keep up with that area. I just know when I used TSSAA's format last night that there were 16 automatic qualifiers and 8 wildcard spots with Sunbright getting the last spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Clay County misses out because their of the three-way tie in the standings. Monterey wins the three-way tiebreaker and gets an automatic bid. the head-to-head win for Clay County doesn't matter in the three-way scenario. Unless TSSAA has their overall or district records wrong.

Jackson Co. is part of that three way tie, but they're 2A. And TSSAA had Clay listed as an automatic qualifier if FC beat Monterey, which they did.

 

 

I know JC is 2A, but playoff qualifiers are determined by final district standings as a whole. When the three-way tie is broken, Monterey finishes above Clay County and gets an automatic bid. TSSAA had the scenario wrong. They also had the scenario wrong in District 4-A when they said both Coalfield and Sunbright could earn automatic bids this week with wins because only one would get the automatic berth. I have called TSSAA in the past to report problems in their scenarios for teams in my area. Unfortunately, it seems no one caught this one before the brackets were released. But the way I see it is Monterey gets the automatic bid unless someone's overall record or district record is wrong. Again, I could be wrong because I don't keep up with that area. I just know when I used TSSAA's format last night that there were 16 automatic qualifiers and 8 wildcard spots with Sunbright getting the last spot.

Who knows. They had Gordonsville playing Monterey in the first round until they changed it. And, we had to play each other because we're in the same region, which we got lumped into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloudland and Coalfield are automatic qualifiers and they are seeded before wildcard teams. That's why Coalfield and Cloudland are higher seeds.

 

Thanks for clearing that up for me. There's absolutley no logic in that seeding process, as evident in this case. They need to set the Quad's then seed the teams accordingly. It shouldn't matter if you win your district or if you are a wild card team, you should be seeded by record/strength of schedule. You could have a team win a weak district and have a terrible record and wild card team from a tough district that has a good record. Just something to talk about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloudland and Coalfield are automatic qualifiers and they are seeded before wildcard teams. That's why Coalfield and Cloudland are higher seeds.

 

Thanks for clearing that up for me. There's absolutley no logic in that seeding process, as evident in this case. They need to set the Quad's then seed the teams accordingly. It shouldn't matter if you win your district or if you are a wild card team, you should be seeded by record/strength of schedule. You could have a team win a weak district and have a terrible record and wild card team from a tough district that has a good record. Just something to talk about.

 

 

 

Think about this. Cloudland could have went 1-9, beat Hancock County and still been the No. 4 seed. I also think overall record should be used to seed teams. Heck, Loudon is 8-2 in Class AAA and playing on the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloudland and Coalfield are automatic qualifiers and they are seeded before wildcard teams. That's why Coalfield and Cloudland are higher seeds.

 

Thanks for clearing that up for me. There's absolutley no logic in that seeding process, as evident in this case. They need to set the Quad's then seed the teams accordingly. It shouldn't matter if you win your district or if you are a wild card team, you should be seeded by record/strength of schedule. You could have a team win a weak district and have a terrible record and wild card team from a tough district that has a good record. Just something to talk about.

That really isn't much different than year's past.

There has been 3 and 4 seeds from strong districts have to play 1 and 2 seeds from weak districts.

But, I think one thing we can agree on is that this is a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cloudland and Coalfield are automatic qualifiers and they are seeded before wildcard teams. That's why Coalfield and Cloudland are higher seeds.

 

Thanks for clearing that up for me. There's absolutley no logic in that seeding process, as evident in this case. They need to set the Quad's then seed the teams accordingly. It shouldn't matter if you win your district or if you are a wild card team, you should be seeded by record/strength of schedule. You could have a team win a weak district and have a terrible record and wild card team from a tough district that has a good record. Just something to talk about.

 

 

 

Think about this. Cloudland could have went 1-9, beat Hancock County and still been the No. 4 seed. I also think overall record should be used to seed teams. Heck, Loudon is 8-2 in Class AAA and playing on the road.

I think White Co. made it in at 1-9. Ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the playoffs need to to be revamped. I saw it coming. White County is in 4-A won only one game and was in only two games all year. They were beaten soundly by everyone else yet get a decent seed at 1-9 becasue they beat Cumberland County 21-14 last night. Unreal!

Then the TSSAA tells us we have to be in the Mega-Region because we have two Districts with 4 and 5 teams each so we all play in a 9-team Region. BUT they allow a 3 team region in District 16 Class 2-A with 2 of them going. Unbelievable!

We are #26 in Class 2-A, Dresden is #25, so it might not even help us, BUT you hate to be told one thing and then it not be the case. The track record of TSSAA officials is not very good. I am not saying they are misrepresenting the facts but maybe just misinformed. Anytime you are the creator of something and you provide misinformation about it, you lose credibility. The TSSAA is teetering on the edge of the credibility issue.

My advice to the TSSAA - Make your rules, let everyone know what they are and then go by them across the board WITHOUT playing favorites. What applies to one district should apply to all. Are you going to try to fix it or is just a small school problem that you will ignore. If the Class 2-A District 16 situation was in 6-A or 5-A you would have already fixed it. That's not an accusation, it's simply a fact..... and maybe an indictment of the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT TSSAA WEBSITE SHOULD BE SAYING

 

 

 

Brackets are down while adjustments are being made. TSSAA Apologizes for SCREWING EVERYTHING UP We have made ALOT OF errors in the seedings AND ELIGIBLE TEAMS which will create changes in some of the brackets.IF YOU DONT LIKE IT TOUGH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • While I appreciate being credited with multiple accounts, I have to say that is not true. Will you please report back to your people that I am not someone who provides sharp, witty banter, but rather someone who is putting the shoe on the other foot for some people that have been repeatedly bashing others here and in real life for the past few years? Everything that I have stated has been backed by factual evidence or public record, so no need to be sharp and witty. 
    • Yes this process is moving slower than I would have expected
    • also was told coady auston applied, he served as defensive coordinator for greenfield under don pitt several years ago before going to Obion county  
    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
×
  • Create New...