chattanooga Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 either you haven't seen them all, or you have trouble counting birdie.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chattanooga Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 not saying i agree....but the kids seem to have just the CCS game and one more left in their season....could be reason for leaving some starters in game.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waterboy96 Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 Having read that someone else had guardianship of this boy when he was in Georgia, does this create another eligibility problem? FOR THE BOARD'S SAKE, I HOPE NOT! NOBODY WANTS TO WADE THROUGH ANOTHER 60 PAGES OF PURPLEGRAD BARB AND INDIAN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barb Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 not saying i agree....but the kids seem to have just the CCS game and one more left in their season....could be reason for leaving some starters in game.... With an appeal pending, leaving starters in late just exposes them to unnecessary risk of injury. What kind of outrage would there have been if that stud QB had been injured in the last few minutes of that game and SM won their appeal...I don't think the Eagles would want to head into the play-offs with that kind of hole in their roster. Unless of course, Price doesn't think they are gonna win at the hearing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chattanooga Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) i don't see how the tssaa can change their ruling....their bylaws are very clear contrary to the posts in here that they are not.....if they had filed for a hardship with the TSSAA properly they may have had a chance at obtaining one from them through the correct channels......tssaa can not ignore the fact that their rules were not followed.....no grey area....it is a done deal.... Edited October 15, 2011 by chattanooga Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
signalbirdie Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) either you haven't seen them all, or you have trouble counting birdie.... Have a son on the team, have attended EVERY game, And I mean EVERY game from the very beginning, you are just riding a hate train to nowhere buddy. I imagine the reason Troll and other reasonable Signal posters have stopped posting is that this thread has escalated to a new level of bull s#\t that is intolerable. You should all take a step back and check yourselves...this has gotten way out of line. Edited October 15, 2011 by signalbirdie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingman10 Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 With an appeal pending, leaving starters in late just exposes them to unnecessary risk of injury. What kind of outrage would there have been if that stud QB had been injured in the last few minutes of that game and SM won their appeal...I don't think the Eagles would want to head into the play-offs with that kind of hole in their roster. Unless of course, Price doesn't think they are gonna win at the hearing. The hearing will be worse for Price. New info has come out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barb Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 Have a son on the team, have attended EVERY game, And I mean EVERY game from the very beginning, you are just riding a hate train to nowhere buddy. I imagine the reason Troll and other reasonable Signal posters have stopped posting is that this thread has escalated to a new level of bull s#\t that is intolerable. You should all take a step back and check yourselves...this has gotten way out of line. wow...you just used Troll and "other reasonable Signal posters" in the same sentence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeehaw Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) The hearing will be worse for Price. New info has come out And the post was promptly deleted. Note to el deleter: it is publicly available information - all I had to do was archive it. Edited October 15, 2011 by Yeehaw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancer10 Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 A lot of posting today but still haven't read anyone's justification for hanging 75 on CCS last night. Time outs in the 4th quarter, starting RB still running for a TD is last couple of minutes, hurry up offense,...anyone going to attempt to justify? Other than one poster ho wasn't comfortable with a 69-35 lead in the 4th quarter. Do you really think that shows any class at all? I'm serious--can you be satisfied with that kind of leadership? I was there,so I will try too.The QB got hit in the back and lost control of the ball.And CCS got the ball back,or it would have been 81 points............Now can SM be satisfied with that kind of leadership? I would have to say NO!!!....All of us on the hill.think they should have ran the ball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chattanooga Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 i was at the game...i saw it with my own valley dwelling eyes..... the rule in question is below straight from the TSSAA bylaws: b. A student who transfers as a result of a change of residence is ineligible unless (1) the old residence is outside the territory of the new school, and (2) the new residence is both outside the territory of the old school and inside the territory of the new school; It was clear that the residence was not in the signal mtn school zone.....to check the box that it was without picking up the phone and calling bernard childress and making sure the tssaa agreed with their ASSUMPTION that the residence should be considered in zone due to the HCDE allowing a hardship was just a very negligent thing to do.....all coaches and AD's know that the TSSAA view their bylaws very narrowly....they had to know that they were treading in an area that most prudent people would have asked for clarification from the TSSAA before checking the box that implied that the residence was in the signal mtn. school zone when there was no eveidence of that being the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smeagle1 Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 To all you haters all I can say is WOW the future looks bright!!! Me and the family just got back from our recruiting trip down to the Lions Den to watch Red Bank v Howard. :roflolk: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.