82Wildcat68 Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys. I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely. LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetScience Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 What will they do with 14, 11, and 13? If you put them somewhere else who do you take off the field? On defense or offense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetScience Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys. I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely. LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4. I think it's definitely settled. what other guy impressed you besides Henderson? Dunbar is a good runner, but brings not much to the table in terms of airing it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys. I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely. LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4. Who do you think it will be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82Wildcat68 Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweetScience Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong. I think it is settled by a long shot, but maybe i am wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong. I'm not sure what they'll do but I hope they make a choice and go with it. He seems like the best from the two scrimmages and one game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82Wildcat68 Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 They must see something they really like in him in practice, to go ahead and play him in a game over the others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladerunner Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 We need to get him the ball, Dunbar, Higgins (thought he was gonna catch that long bomb last night towards the end of the game. He almost did. Frosh btw), Row e the ball, etc etc etc. We have a lot of weapons. This team will be real good by years end. Been saying that for awhile. For the record- I tried to bring up Higgins and it was ignored in the last thread. I have heard nothing but great things about this kid and it looks like he's gonna be a true stand out from the freshman class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catswild Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 For the record- I tried to bring up Higgins and it was ignored in the last thread. I have heard nothing but great things about this kid and it looks like he's gonna be a true stand out from the freshman class. He looks smooth in practice and almost made a great catch Friday night. He seems to have great speed too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OR nole Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys. I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely. LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4. LBs - think back to how Elliot Normand and Zak Clark looked in their first varsity games against Farragut. Not very good. They turned out OK. Same with these young players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ridgerunner91 Posted September 1, 2013 Report Share Posted September 1, 2013 How does anyone think we will rebound? I was impressed with Rowe. We don't have much speed on defense. Mitchell is a dangerous receiver. If Dunbar isn't QB what do we do with him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.