Clinton vs. Oak Ridge

[82Wildcat68]

I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys.

 

I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely.

 

LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4.

[SweetScience]

What will they do with 14, 11, and 13? If you put them somewhere else who do you take off the field?

On defense or offense?

[SweetScience]

I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys.

 

I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely.

 

LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4.

I think it's definitely settled. what other guy impressed you besides Henderson? Dunbar is a good runner, but brings not much to the table in terms of airing it out.

[catswild]

I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys.

 

I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely.

 

LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4.

Who do you think it will be?

[82Wildcat68]

I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong.

[SweetScience]

I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong.

I think it is settled by a long shot, but maybe i am wrong. 

[catswild]

I'm not saying the offense didn't seem to move the ball when he was in, and I don't have anything against him if that's who gets the nod. I just think as much as they vacillated about it before, I wouldn't be surprised if there is more experimentation there this week. Could be wrong.

I'm not sure what they'll do but I hope they make a choice and go with it. He seems like the best from the two scrimmages and one game.

[82Wildcat68]

They must see something they really like in him in practice, to go ahead and play him in a game over the others.

[bladerunner]

We need to get him the ball, Dunbar, Higgins (thought he was gonna catch that long bomb last night towards the end of the game. He almost did. Frosh btw), Row e the ball, etc etc etc. We have a lot of weapons. This team will be real good by years end. Been saying that for awhile.

For the record- I tried to bring up Higgins and it was ignored in the last thread. I have heard nothing but great things about this kid and it looks like he's gonna be a true stand out from the freshman class.

[catswild]

For the record- I tried to bring up Higgins and it was ignored in the last thread. I have heard nothing but great things about this kid and it looks like he's gonna be a true stand out from

the freshman class.

He looks smooth in practice and almost made a great catch Friday night. He seems to have great speed too.

[OR nole]

I think we have several. Rowe, and Mitchell to name a couple, and Bonds is a track runner. We need to get the ball to those guys.

 

I wonder if the QB question is settled. I'll be a little surprised if it is entirely.

 

LB's need to figure out what's going on if we're going to run the 3-4.

LBs - think back to how Elliot Normand and Zak Clark looked in their first varsity games against Farragut. Not very good. They turned out OK. Same with these young players.

[ridgerunner91]

How does anyone think we will rebound? I was impressed with Rowe. We don't have much speed on defense. Mitchell is a dangerous receiver. If Dunbar isn't QB what do we do with him?