Jump to content

Poll: Public-Private Vote


CoachT
 Share

Public-Private  

72 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of the following do you prefer?

    • Keep things the way they are
    • Complete Split
    • All schools in one division but classification split based on whether the school is in a rural or urban environment
    • Advancement to the next class based on success
    • Combine everybody in the regular season and have a postseason split


Recommended Posts

See post #9.

I don't care about recruiting. Schools like Lipscomb, CPA and Knoxville Catholic don't need to recruit to attract students to their academic and athletic missions.

 

I care about the declining sense of competition, which exists in an inverse relationship with our athletic leaders' sense of entitlement. "We can't beat them. They're winning at a disproportionate rate. Rather than raising our own standards, let's refuse to play them and kick them out of our league." That's a poor lesson to teach the kids who are developing athletically, mentally and morally under their care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% correct.  If there's a split you'll have coaches, students, parents, ect at a middle school game with their private school colors and letters on........there will be nothing a public school coach can do. 

That's not accurate. DII schools will still be bound by TSSAA rules, as they are now. They could still get reported and sanctioned. 

 

But where you are correct -- if all private schools are kicked out of DI, they may be inclined to start their own league altogether. With so many new schools joining the old-guard DII schools, there would now be enough teams to financially and logistically support a new association. And if that happened, DI publics would have no way to sanction schools who chose to recruit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not accurate. DII schools will still be bound by TSSAA rules, as they are now. They could still get reported and sanctioned. 

 

But where you are correct -- if all private schools are kicked out of DI, they may be inclined to start their own league altogether. With so many new schools joining the old-guard DII schools, there would now be enough teams to financially and logistically support a new association. And if that happened, DI publics would have no way to sanction schools who chose to recruit.

My scenario is under a full split which takes privates away from any TSSAA punishment.  This is why the TSSAA will not vote for a full split.  TSSAA knows they would loose an arms race against privates so they wanna keep them close but not to close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about recruiting. Schools like Lipscomb, CPA and Knoxville Catholic don't need to recruit to attract students to their academic and athletic missions.

 

I care about the declining sense of competition, which exists in an inverse relationship with our athletic leaders' sense of entitlement. "We can't beat them. They're winning at a disproportionate rate. Rather than raising our own standards, let's refuse to play them and kick them out of our league." That's a poor lesson to teach the kids who are developing athletically, mentally and morally under their care.

Excellent Point Sir.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care about recruiting. Schools like Lipscomb, CPA and Knoxville Catholic don't need to recruit to attract students to their academic and athletic missions.

 

I care about the declining sense of competition, which exists in an inverse relationship with our athletic leaders' sense of entitlement. "We can't beat them. They're winning at a disproportionate rate. Rather than raising our own standards, let's refuse to play them and kick them out of our league." That's a poor lesson to teach the kids who are developing athletically, mentally and morally under their care.

 

+100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any team in the state that can sway good athletes to their school does. that's public and private, some schools are in a much better situation than others. I think the best way to deal with this is rural and urban. But that would still be extremely difficult. I'd say the meeting today would be a fun one to watch. Its a huge majority that wants the split but that will not address the things it takes to create a level playing field. It goes much deeper than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it really that difficult to make schools play players that are zoned for specific schools? Seems pretty simple to me that you play where you live. If you want to attend a school outside your zone for 'academic reasons' bad enough, then you should forfeit your eligibility to play sports. People don't have a sense of pride in where they are from anymore. Most would rather transfer somewhere to win, as opposed to working hard and representing their town/community. Just my two cents

Edited by thegreatwhite1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of their possible districts (put out there at the last minute, apparently) looked ridiculous. It's as if they're purposely wanting the stress the worst possible results to sway opinion and votes.

I agree 100%. Kreager w DNJ has a 2nd grade grasp of geography and high school athletics beyond Rutherford County. Propaganda reporting if you ask me
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • If an attorney sees enough merit in the case they will take it and only collect if their client wins. Happens in civil cases all the time. 
    • Groves got the ball over 20+ times. His son arguably played the best for East in that game. 3rd and long multiple times and he came up big to continue a couple drives. Please shut up for the 3rd year in a row
    • And can you tell me who those two quarterbacks were, and every kid that was put into college from Bearden is a Bearden kid? It’s kind of why they graduated from Bearden.   and I would definitely not consider ETSU “waste”…
    • Most of this is complete gibberish. But the one part I could decipher is putting kids in college. This coaching staff hasn’t put a single Bearden kid in college. They completed wasted one of the best WRs in East TN and have ruined two talented QBs. All because they’re in over their heads. 
    • Well, I’d hope the new coaching staff thinks they are all that because they can always walk around the school, anytime they want, thinking that, especially for what they’ve done for the student athletes and the players, putting more kids in college in his first season than the old coaching staff did in numerous years combined, but we will just sweep over that because I know you don’t like facts. But trust me, nobody wanted Mr. Big britches, made the star player switch to quarterback, which is ultimately the reason he ended up transferring to play the position. He loved, but unfortunately, had to be at another school because Mr. Big Britches doesn’t like when a teenager knows more than him, but can’t expect much coming from a guy who used all class throwing pencils up into the ceiling and making fun of football kids who were failing class right to their face, and in front of numerous students, even projecting on the board most of the time.
×
  • Create New...