Jump to content

TSSAA MID CYCLE ENROLLMENTS


Southtowner
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

That’s a stupid system. Your school is big and you suck, but you get to go to the playoffs.  That’s the dumbest thing they ever did. They have 0-10 teams going in that voodoo system. 

It may be coming back.  All the privates will be gone.  Only a few lingered around the last reclassification.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

Am I correct? The only teams that will move up or down next year are teams that increased or decreased by 20% or more?

That is correct.

If you have an increase of 20% or more AND it causes you to fall in a higher class then you will be moved.  No option.

If you have a decrease of 20% or more AND it cause you to drop to another class then you can opt out of the class you're in and drop down.

Anyone that doesn't have an increase or decrease of 20% or more ain't going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should put in a rule, no moving up to avoid competition. Any move up needs to be approved, and judged for a good reason-either better competition or travel considerations. The moving up leaves them scrambling to place regions together, so you have Anderson County playing East Ridge and Howard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheAmbassador said:

That’s a stupid system. Your school is big and you suck, but you get to go to the playoffs.  That’s the dumbest thing they ever did. They have 0-10 teams going in that voodoo system. 

Frankly, they could fix that by only letting 8 schools in the playoffs for super 32.  In reality, only 3 teams from a region should made it in the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bass, take Mitchell for instance.  They had more than a 20% decrease in enrollment but it wasn't enough of a drop in enrollment to let them opt out of 2A and come down to 1A.

They have 397 students this mid classification.  Down from 508.  The 397 still leaves them in 2A because the cutoff for 1A was set at 375 the last classification. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Southtowner said:

Bass, take Mitchell for instance.  They had more than a 20% decrease in enrollment but it wasn't enough of a drop in enrollment to let them opt out of 2A and come down to 1A.

They have 397 students this mid classification.  Down from 508.  The 397 still leaves them in 2A because the cutoff for 1A was set at 375 the last classification. 

I just noticed Trousdale at 360 putting them below the line from 2016. Didn’t know if they would try to move them or not. I was thinking like you that the only way you could move down was to be 20% decrease into another class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheAmbassador said:

I just noticed Trousdale at 360 putting them below the line from 2016. Didn’t know if they would try to move them or not. I was thinking like you that the only way you could move down was to be 20% decrease into another class. 

Yes you have to have a 20% decrease or more.  Trousdale has 1A enrollment numbers but didn't have the necessary 20% decrease to opt out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Southtowner said:

I highly doubt you'll ever see just 3 classes in DI football anymore.  With what is known about concussions and brain injuries nowadays.  No way an Association would open themselves up to that with the difference in enrollments.   Those days are gone and prolly for the better.  Now we can argue there are too many classes as of now but I believe the argument of just 3 is already sailed.

You are correct that we will probably never see a classification with 100 schools in one division.  Lets be honest it has nothing to do with concussions but it has everything to do with parents, kids, coaches and the administration at schools today being SOFT.  Everyone wants a trophy but they really don't want to put in the work necessary to win a state title.

Edited by cbg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...