Jump to content

York @ Signal MNT


payner410
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, SCPRIDE30 said:

I didn’t see any guys running a 4.6 lol you have lost your mind. The wide receiver is probably there fastest player 

if you remember #1 from last year? He made the finals in the 100 last year and now plays for Tennessee Tech?  16 can run stride for stride with him.  I'm not arguing with you on the matter. I KNOW.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Infamousfootballfan said:

Track speed and football speed is different. Some kids can't cross that speed over and make it work for football. I'm just saying, and I'm not saying this is York's issue.

Thomas Miller is very fast on both track and on the football field. Cole Cooper picked up a fumble against Livingston and had 2 LA players on his. He quickly put space between them for the TD. I hope Signal Mountain thinks York will be a pushover like last year's York team that only won 49-21.

 

Edited by bobcatfan300
miss spelled word
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Indian said:

Sounds as if York should have been 10-0 with all this talent. 

No, 9-1. They fumbled on the 6 yard line against Sequatchie and should have scored. They also had a mixed up play on 3rd down. Had they made  a few yards they would have gone for it on 4th. If they didn't make it Sequatchie would have taken over deep in their own end. Upperman was the better team against York.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, bobcatfan300 said:

Thomas Miller is very fast on both track and on the football field. Cole Cooper picked up a fumble against Livingston and had 2 LA players on his. He quickly put space between them for the TD. I hope Signal Mountain thinks York will be a pushover like last year's York team that only won 49-21.

 

I saw the LHS game those two players were linemen.lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think York wins by 14. Should be a close game till about mid 3rd quarter and York will start pulling away with the lead. If they can control the clock and win the time of possession battle and keep this “amazing pass game” of Signal of the field  I don’t see Signal winning the game. As for us being slow is actually hilarious. Now I don’t know if they could run a 4.6 but I guarantee you once any of our backs get in the open field (other than our big fullbacks) they will out run anyone on the defense. Not sure why Signal fans are getting all butt hurt... I think their still salty from the beat down last year on the mountain lol. all jokes aside should be a great game to watch! 

Edited by YorkPride21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...