runninblind Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 Not a good offensive night for the wave ! 3 turnovers one fumble at the goal line and a TD called back for a holding call..QB out in 4th quarter with what looked like an ankle injury . A win is a win no matter how ugly ! Defense was dominate ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWAVE1 Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 21 minutes ago, runninblind said: Not a good offensive night for the wave ! 3 turnovers one fumble at the goal line and a TD called back for a holding call..QB out in 4th quarter with what looked like an ankle injury . A win is a win no matter how ugly ! Defense was dominate ! I saw video of that fumble and he sure looked like he crossed the goal before the ball came out but it is what it is. Definitely left points on the field. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidTennFootball Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 27 minutes ago, runninblind said: Not a good offensive night for the wave ! 3 turnovers one fumble at the goal line and a TD called back for a holding call..QB out in 4th quarter with what looked like an ankle injury . A win is a win no matter how ugly ! Defense was dominate ! Over the course of the season, your gonna have games that aren't pretty. One irrefutable proof across all sports: your offense will come and go, but a dominant defense will always show up 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glademom Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, runninblind said: Not a good offensive night for the wave ! 3 turnovers one fumble at the goal line and a TD called back for a holding call..QB out in 4th quarter with what looked like an ankle injury . A win is a win no matter how ugly ! Defense was dominate ! I agree that the Gallatin offense struggled, but the WC offense was no where to be found. I hate to say this but this Gallatin team is very average IMO. Old "G" teams would pound you to death; I really think this team with that RB could be better, but the would have to go back perhaps some type of "I" attack under center...……….they cannot pass GAS. Some times "old school" ain't bad. they will have good run in the post-season but IMO they could be better; they cannot beat a good team...………..now that is just my opinion Edited September 28, 2019 by glademom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eers Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, glademom said: I agree that the Gallatin offense struggled, but the WC offense was no where to be found. I hate to say this but this Gallatin team is very average IMO. Old "G" teams would pound you to death; I really think this team with that RB could be better, but the would have to go back perhaps some type of "I" attack under center...……….they cannot pass GAS. Some times "old school" ain't bad. they will have good run in the post-season but IMO they could be better; they cannot beat a good team...………..now that is just my opinion prepare to be slaughtered... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWAVE1 Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 3 hours ago, glademom said: I agree that the Gallatin offense struggled, but the WC offense was no where to be found. I hate to say this but this Gallatin team is very average IMO. Old "G" teams would pound you to death; I really think this team with that RB could be better, but the would have to go back perhaps some type of "I" attack under center...……….they cannot pass GAS. Some times "old school" ain't bad. they will have good run in the post-season but IMO they could be better; they cannot beat a good team...………..now that is just my opinion This very average Gallatin team held your team under 60 total yards and only one first down the second half while churning out over 300 yards of offense via pass and run. If Gallatin is just average then Wilson Central is very very bad. JMO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eers Posted September 28, 2019 Report Share Posted September 28, 2019 2 hours ago, GWAVE1 said: This very average Gallatin team held your team under 60 total yards and only one first down the second half while churning out over 300 yards of offense via pass and run. If Gallatin is just average then Wilson Central is very very bad. JMO Hey... you said it. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glademom Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 1 hour ago, eers said: Hey... you said it. Lol That did come out bad; please accept apology. I followed WC closely a few years ago when my nephew played......….so I am just an occasional HS football fan. I saw very small sample the other. Now, I did see "G" back in the day when they were the real deal. Person I was talking with at game said WC was not very good on "O" vs MJ last week. With that good looking RB ya'll have and big linemen; "G" looks like a power fb team to me...….now that is simply my opinion only. I just do not like what they do on "O"; I hate to see a good RB get nailed before he gets started. They should have scored 30+ the other night; WC "D" played hard but no help from their "O". Gallatin miscues also aided the WC defense. Gallatin is a good solid team...……..not great......….Yet!! IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJGOLDENBEARS Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 14 minutes ago, glademom said: That did come out bad; please accept apology. I followed WC closely a few years ago when my nephew played......….so I am just an occasional HS football fan. I saw very small sample the other. Now, I did see "G" back in the day when they were the real deal. Person I was talking with at game said WC was not very good on "O" vs MJ last week. With that good looking RB ya'll have and big linemen; "G" looks like a power fb team to me...….now that is simply my opinion only. I just do not like what they do on "O"; I hate to see a good RB get nailed before he gets started. They should have scored 30+ the other night; WC "D" played hard but no help from their "O". Gallatin miscues also aided the WC defense. Gallatin is a good solid team...……..not great......….Yet!! IMHO. The Beech/Gallatin game will answer all of these questions... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eers Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, MJGOLDENBEARS said: The Beech/Gallatin game will answer all of these questions... Man... that depends which Beech team shows up. For most of the night Friday (aside from a couple missed tackles), they played like “Beech” again. Played with confidence and a little swagger. Still some things to clean up, but for most of the game they handled a much bigger Lebanon team in both sides of the ball. Edited September 29, 2019 by eers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJGOLDENBEARS Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 7 hours ago, eers said: Man... that depends which Beech team shows up. For most of the night Friday (aside from a couple missed tackles), they played like “Beech” again. Played with confidence and a little swagger. Still some things to clean up, but for most of the game they handled a much bigger Lebanon team in both sides of the ball. Seems right looking at the score.... but explain how they let Lebanon’s running back have a 200+ yard night. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eers Posted September 29, 2019 Report Share Posted September 29, 2019 3 hours ago, MJGOLDENBEARS said: Seems right looking at the score.... but explain how they let Lebanon’s running back have a 200+ yard night. There’s your couple broken tackles... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.