93grad Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 Gonna break my refresh button! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, 93grad said: Gonna break my refresh button! Been 30 minutes since the last tweet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 Per Tom Kreager: They are in executive session. Ineligible player had a hardship request. Says he was bullied in Alabama. Will determine that before the territory issue. That part is open to the media I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
croz6110 Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Southtowner said: Per Tom Kreager: They are in executive session. Ineligible player had a hardship request. Says he was bullied in Alabama. Will determine that before the territory issue. That part is open to the media I believe. Personally, I don't see how bullying in Alabama has any relevance. He moved from out of state. The reason why shouldn't matter. It seems tbe territory issue is wbat rules him eligible or ineligible. Focus on that and wrap this up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 When was the hardship filed? Today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PullinGuard Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Southtowner said: When was the hardship filed? Today? I know nothing at all about it. But the tweet says 'had', and that implies it was done sometime in the past. Could've been in the background all along, I don't know. Even if it existed from day one, it would've been rendered moot by the original 'all-clear' letter, and therefore never considered until now. Just a theory. I assume you couldn't file it now, but don't know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, croz6110 said: Personally, I don't see how bullying in Alabama has any relevance. He moved from out of state. The reason why shouldn't matter. It seems tbe territory issue is wbat rules him eligible or ineligible. Focus on that and wrap this up. I'm just wondering when the hardship was filed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, PullinGuard said: I know nothing at all about it. But the tweet says 'had', and that implies it was done sometime in the past. Could've been in the background all along, I don't know. Even if it existed from day one, it would've been rendered moot by the original 'all-clear' letter, and therefore never considered until now. Just a theory. I assume you couldn't file it now, but don't know. If I were to guess at this, I'd say the hardship being ruled on before the territory issue is key. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 Surely this hardship hasn't been filed at the beginning of all this and just now coming to the forefront. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerNation Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Southtowner said: Surely this hardship hasn't been filed at the beginning of all this and just now coming to the forefront. I wouldn't think so, either, unless it was just completely overlooked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PullinGuard Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Southtowner said: Surely this hardship hasn't been filed at the beginning of all this and just now coming to the forefront. I could easily imagine it given the initial clearance under normal rules. Hardships are much harder to consider than an address only ordinarily, and if Childress says he's good to go under the normal transfer rules, I don't think anyone would have any interest in considering the hardship (and lots of reasons not to). From either side. The hardship application would serve no purpose if he's ruled good without it - that's my point. So it would be no surprise if it were filed from the start but then never considered. Again, 100% a theory. I know nothing at all about it. Edited November 5, 2019 by PullinGuard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtowner Posted November 5, 2019 Report Share Posted November 5, 2019 4 minutes ago, PullinGuard said: I could easily imagine it given the initial clearance under normal rules. Hardships are much harder to consider ordinarily, and if Childress says he's good to go under the normal transfer rules, I don't think anyone would have any interest in considering the hardship. From either side. The hardship application would serve no purpose if he's ruled good without it is my point, so no surprise if it were never considered. Again, 100% a theory. I know nothing at all about it. Another theory would be the TSSAA pulled this hardship out of thin air today to save face and therefore not have to rule on the territory issue at hand. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.