Jump to content

Union City


Bellsburg2
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

Regular season games cancelled due to Covid are recorded as no contest. If it’s a playoff game the team that can’t play must forfeit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

You dont get a win during reg season for cancellations only in playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, crow said:

Regular season games cancelled due to Covid are recorded as no contest. If it’s a playoff game the team that can’t play must forfeit. 

Region games would have to be considered a forfeit/win to get proper seeding for the playoffs. Right?

 

for instance.. Team A finishes 5-1 in region while team B finishes 4-1 but they beat the 5-1 team A in the season.  Team B never got to play team C region team because team C cancelled on them. Head to head could only count between A and B if they have the same record. In that situation team B that never cancelled a game would get screwed because team C cancelled. 

Edited by Pirate2003
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

From TSSAA

The board also tackled how to handle a COVID-19 breakout as it pertains to competition in both the regular and postseason. A regular-season game becomes a win for seeding purposes if the opposing team can’t play due to COVID-19, but the team struck with illness would receive neither a win nor a loss. If both teams confront outbreaks of the virus, it is considered a “no-contest.”

 

According to this, this game will go as a win for UC, and a no-contest for LC.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

So UC is now playing USJ?  I’ve seen so many possibilities since LC had to cancel.  If they get a win from the LC quarantine, and also play someone else and win, does that make them a true 2-0?  Or if they play someone else does it cancel out their COVID win?

USJ is not taking LC's spot. USJ is taking the place of one of the Memphis teams that cancelled because they are not playing at all. So there was no win for that game just an open spot which we have filled. Same with our game scheduled now with S. Fulton. It takes the place of the other Memphis school we had scheduled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bellsburg2 said:

UC had their week 1 and 2 games cancelled and has picked up USJ for week 2. I tried to start a conversation about our week 1 matchup, but the DII board is nothing but crickets. Can someone could tell me how the Tornadoes are shaping up this year?

That's really difficult to answer. We have a new coach this year and therefore some changes to the system. I like what I have seen in practice, but that's practice. Generally our number 1's vs our 2's and 3's so how true a picture am I really getting. Without the usual jamborees/scrimmages it's hard to know for sure, especially with a new coach.  I can say they have been working hard and are going to be ready to play. I have no doubt whoever we play will get a hard nosed, all out effort from 1st play to last, and that's all I can ask. How that translates in wins and losses we will just have to wait and see. And I am tired of waiting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, orngnblk said:

You dont get a win during reg season for cancellations only in playoffs.

 

9 hours ago, LinemanRC said:

From TSSAA

The board also tackled how to handle a COVID-19 breakout as it pertains to competition in both the regular and postseason. A regular-season game becomes a win for seeding purposes if the opposing team can’t play due to COVID-19, but the team struck with illness would receive neither a win nor a loss. If both teams confront outbreaks of the virus, it is considered a “no-contest.”

 

According to this, this game will go as a win for UC, and a no-contest for LC.

So it’s a win for UC but only shows up as a win ONLY IF it becomes the difference for seeding purposes?  So UC could possibly end up with a  10 (+1) - 0 record since they picked up a game in place of the lost COVID game?  Assuming UC actually “plays” a 10 game schedule.  Maybe I’m looking into it too much.  Sorry.  Several folks keep asking me questions I don’t know the answers to so that’s why I’m asking so much.  Potentially UC could end up:

10 (+1) - 0 = 11-0 but COVID “win” isn’t really necessary

or

9 (+1) - 1 = 10-1 for seeding purposes

or

9 (+1) - 0 = 10-0 for seeding purposes

Just looking at several what-ifs and how they could potentially help or hinder a team come playoff time

Edited by PiRaTe._.MiKe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, PiRaTe._.MiKe said:

 

So it’s a win for UC but only shows up as a win ONLY IF it becomes the difference for seeding purposes?  So UC could possibly end up with a  10 (+1) - 0 record since they picked up a game in place of the lost COVID game?  Assuming UC actually “plays” a 10 game schedule.  Maybe I’m looking into it too much.  Sorry.  Several folks keep asking me questions I don’t know the answers to so that’s why I’m asking so much.  Potentially UC could end up:

10 (+1) - 0 = 11-0 but COVID “win” isn’t really necessary

or

9 (+1) - 1 = 10-1 for seeding purposes

or

9 (+1) - 0 = 10-0 for seeding purposes

Just looking at several what-ifs and how they could potentially help or hinder a team come playoff time

The verbiage is a little ambiguous, but I think it goes down as a win regardless of whether there would actually be a tiebreaker circumstance where this (non region) game would have any bearing on playoff seeding. Not sure though. 
     But Union City has not found a replacement game for Lake County, and likely won’t at this late hour. The USJ and South Fulton games are replacements for two Memphis teams later on the schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinemanRC said:

The verbiage is a little ambiguous, but I think it goes down as a win regardless of whether there would actually be a tiebreaker circumstance where this (non region) game would have any bearing on playoff seeding. Not sure though. 
     But Union City has not found a replacement game for Lake County, and likely won’t at this late hour. The USJ and South Fulton games are replacements for two Memphis teams later on the schedule.

Oh ok now I understand the replacement gAmes reasoning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • What you are saying is true about high school athletics being a privilege and not a right, but NO ONE ever knows what will happen if a case goes before a jury.  Again, I have been in a couple of jury rooms and it's always a little crazy.  That is why my prediction is you will see a settlement before the case goes to trial.
    • What rules does everyone not operate by?
    • So you want a have and have not split? Sound like the perfect ramp to elitism. Tell those rural kids that they'll never be able to compete with those urban kids. They're not good enough right? Or we could just do what travel baseball does and have tournaments every weekend and give kids big fake rings for winning a few games. The suburban public schools are typically the ones with more funds. Urban and rural schools have more in common in finances than they do with rural schools. I've taught and coached in all of it. The difference is attitude. But if you're jsut going to say you can't compete because you don't have the money then that's an excuse. Especially in basketball. The balls are the same size, the rims are the same height and size. The ball dribbles the same in some rural gym in mountains as it does in the FedEx forum. Charters come and go like a fart in the wind. They are no real threat to anyone. Magnets could be but rarely do they win either. It just hasn't been seen in Tennessee.  
    • That’s a good line. Wins would be Soddy, Howard, and Ooltewah. Maybe East Ham again or Knox Central. Tyner maybe but being that late in the year it’s hard to say. I don’t think we get by Red Bank this year.    Rhea could be anywhere from 2-8 to 6-4. 
    • I agree with the Farragut and Bradley claim. Those will both be wins. Bearden like you say is depending on when you get them in comparison to when the wheels fall off.  As far as West goes I’m 50-50. They have been able to reload so far so until they show me they haven’t I can’t count them out. 
×
  • Create New...