Jump to content

Peabody/Meigs who wins and why


Golddoctor
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, JJNOTTHEBOSS said:

The story gets better each time that they try to fix it. All it is doing is covering for someone that didnt or did make a call. Dont put the rest of the school and sports teams in danger of not finishing the year by not following the rules. 

 

Welcome to the T. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yeti said:

no idea man. Alot of this is news to me. We have alot of new posters popping up though. :lol:

Well I just read the article they didn’t get exposed from Peabody so that means the whole team was exposed else where. Sounds like some rules weren’t followed. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MCCherokee2020 said:

Apparently the assistant coach in question is the superintendent's son. If that is true, that would probably explain why it's not being mentioned because it would be a screw up on behalf of the school. Guess we will never know the truth...

Guess we will never know. So far the truth out of all of this is that our girls beat yours. Thats the only truth we can prove.

 

 

Edited by Yeti
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Yeti said:

Do tell?

I just told you they didn’t get exposed from Peabody so that means a coach or player from meigs was the exposure to the whole team. Who else would be around the whole team ? It also said the team or teams were contacted about the exposure. Why would meigs need to contact the other team unless they are the ones who caused the exposure ? 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tide21 said:

I just told you they didn’t get exposed from Peabody so that means a coach or player from meigs was the exposure to the whole team. Who else would be around the whole team ? It also said the team or teams were contacted about the exposure. Why would meigs need to contact the other team unless they are the ones who caused the exposure ? 

That does not mean a coach or player from Meigs was responsible for the exposure. There are tons of support personnel at Cookeville that had access to multiple teams. People that worked the event that were not necessarily a part of a particular team could have been the exposure. Also the article does not say Meigs contacted the other teams. It just said the teams involved were contacted. Someone in Cookeville that worked the event could have tested positive then the local health department could have contacted teams/schools involved for contact tracing purposes. And this is just one example of many possible scenarios. My point is that the article offers no proof that anyone from Meigs knowingly or unknowingly had Covid and exposed it to others. We should all not assume and rush to judgement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tide21 said:

I just told you they didn’t get exposed from Peabody so that means a coach or player from meigs was the exposure to the whole team. Who else would be around the whole team ? It also said the team or teams were contacted about the exposure. Why would meigs need to contact the other team unless they are the ones who caused the exposure ? 

I'm unaware if anyone has tested at Meigs either way. I dont know who or what or where really. 

 

1 minute ago, BIGPURPLEMACHINE said:

That does not mean a coach or player from Meigs was responsible for the exposure. There are tons of support personnel at Cookeville that had access to multiple teams. People that worked the event that were not necessarily a part of a particular team could have been the exposure. Also the article does not say Meigs contacted the other teams. It just said the teams involved were contacted. Someone in Cookeville that worked the event could have tested positive then the local health department could have contacted teams/schools involved for contact tracing purposes. And this is just one example of many possible scenarios. My point is that the article offers no proof that anyone from Meigs knowingly or unknowingly had Covid and exposed it to others. We should all not assume and rush to judgement. 

Good post, and thanks. I can't say what happened I wasn't there, but its evident some people on here are quick to throw stones. Also alot of closet posters coming out lol. Quick let me make an account... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, MCCherokee2020 said:

Apparently the assistant coach in question is the superintendent's son. If that is true, that would probably explain why it's not being mentioned because it would be a screw up on behalf of the school. Guess we will never know the truth...

No. The superintendents son was at the Bradley game but did not coach, he hasn’t been to basketball practice he is only coaching football. The other assistant coach tested positive Friday, that’s why the basketball team was put in quarantine.

I said Meigs would win by 20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...