Jump to content
Reporting Scores to CoachT ×
How to edit games

Riverside coming to Huntingdon (semi finals)

horse

By horse
in Class 1A & Class 2A

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pantherpride45 Competitor

Pantherpride45

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Bigpun54 said:

Their is a big difference the amount of posts that are posted when both teams are talking crap. Riverside team and fans alike know they are in a tough game this Friday guess most of the talking will b on the field by both sides

This will be a epic battle much respect for both teams 

I would be shocked if it’s +14 point differential on ether side 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Bigpun54
Bigpun54

NFHS is the biggest scam, another racket for TSSAA. Yeah they are their own network but TSSAA gets it cut out of it. From what I understand they charge 20000 just to install the cameras. Then they may

tradertwo
tradertwo

Perez was the feature back until he got injured, which was several games back. Probably faster and shiftier in the hole than Thomas, and still a load to bring down but not the mule that Thomas is. I s

orngnblk
orngnblk

I only picked UC because of your teams shortcomings the past few years but it looks like you all are just playing ball now!Good luck to your boys horse.

ReitzFan Record Holder

ReitzFan

Posted
Posted

it really stinks that Huntingdon is an NFHS school. Not a dime of my money will the NFHS get  for sub par streaming.  If I go to my car, I can pick up 100.9 at least

It would be nice if the Huntingdon principal (who apparently does not fully understand TSSAA media regulations) would take another incorrectly recieved rights fee like he got last week so Riverside could stream the game. 

Just say no to NFHS broadcasts! Maybe the TSSAA will wake up and realize what a sub par product the NFHS is someday.

Anyway, to get back on topic, good luck Riverside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigpun54 Medalist

Bigpun54

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ReitzFan said:

it really stinks that Huntingdon is an NFHS school. Not a dime of my money will the NFHS get  for sub par streaming.  If I go to my car, I can pick up 100.9 at least

It would be nice if the Huntingdon principal (who apparently does not fully understand TSSAA media regulations) would take another incorrectly recieved rights fee like he got last week so Riverside could stream the game. 

Just say no to NFHS broadcasts! Maybe the TSSAA will wake up and realize what a sub par product the NFHS is someday.

Anyway, to get back on topic, good luck Riverside.

NFHS is the biggest scam, another racket for TSSAA. Yeah they are their own network but TSSAA gets it cut out of it. From what I understand they charge 20000 just to install the cameras. Then they may or may not broadcast the game with no announcing. You have to subscribe for a crappy broadcast and don’t see that making much of a dent in that 20,000 already spent. Like last week we would have paid our 750.00 for live-streaming it. Think they would have made more off that w of course TSSAA getting their share of that as well. Can’t believe the number of schools that went w it. Would’ve loved to hear that sales pitch. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
horse Champion

horse

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, Bigpun54 said:

NFHS is the biggest scam, another racket for TSSAA. Yeah they are their own network but TSSAA gets it cut out of it. From what I understand they charge 20000 just to install the cameras. Then they may or may not broadcast the game with no announcing. You have to subscribe for a crappy broadcast and don’t see that making much of a dent in that 20,000 already spent. Like last week we would have paid our 750.00 for live-streaming it. Think they would have made more off that w of course TSSAA getting their share of that as well. Can’t believe the number of schools that went w it. Would’ve loved to hear that sales pitch. 

Why would schools allow somebody to video games anyway? I’m sure it cuts down on attendance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ReitzFan Record Holder

ReitzFan

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, horse said:

Why would schools allow somebody to video games anyway? I’m sure it cuts down on attendance. 

using that theory, you should immediately ban radio broadcasts of high school sporting events as well.

You apparently don't understand the exposure that a school can recieve. Family who live out of state or out of country can see family members play. Out of town alumni can watch their school play and increase donations. A fan at home may see a game on video and come to the game next week  There are any number of reasons to keep video streaming. The loss at the gate is minimal.

Your own administration needs to re read and better understand the media regulations put in place by the TSSAA. Based on last Friday against UC, they don't understand them too well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
horse Champion

horse

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, ReitzFan said:

using that theory, you should immediately ban radio broadcasts of high school sporting events as well.

You apparently don't understand the exposure that a school can recieve. Family who live out of state or out of country can see family members play. Out of town alumni can watch their school play and increase donations. A fan at home may see a game on video and come to the game next week  There are any number of reasons to keep video streaming. The loss at the gate is minimal.

Your own administration needs to re read and better understand the media regulations put in place by the TSSAA. Based on last Friday against UC, they don't understand them too well.

I understand exposure and if a school is going to video games the schools should do it and receive all the money.  They have someone videoing every game from several different angles anyway.  I don’t know how many public schools get donations from fans watching football online.  And radio is nothing like video but there’s some radio personality that need canceled. 

Edited by horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites
horse Champion

horse

Posted
  • Author
Posted
28 minutes ago, ReitzFan said:

using that theory, you should immediately ban radio broadcasts of high school sporting events as well.

You apparently don't understand the exposure that a school can recieve. Family who live out of state or out of country can see family members play. Out of town alumni can watch their school play and increase donations. A fan at home may see a game on video and come to the game next week  There are any number of reasons to keep video streaming. The loss at the gate is minimal.

Your own administration needs to re read and better understand the media regulations put in place by the TSSAA. Based on last Friday against UC, they don't understand them too well.

You should call the administrator and read and explain it to him. And maybe he would change it because you don’t like the quality of the videos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TryNotToSuck Medalist

TryNotToSuck

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, ReitzFan said:

using that theory, you should immediately ban radio broadcasts of high school sporting events as well.

You apparently don't understand the exposure that a school can recieve. Family who live out of state or out of country can see family members play. Out of town alumni can watch their school play and increase donations. A fan at home may see a game on video and come to the game next week  There are any number of reasons to keep video streaming. The loss at the gate is minimal.

Your own administration needs to re read and better understand the media regulations put in place by the TSSAA. Based on last Friday against UC, they don't understand them too well.

Would you be a fan of charging a $5 dollar fee per game for someone to look at the game online? Basically just staying at home, and paying the home school the "gate" just online. If a family of four shows up to a game, then they'll have to pay $20, but only $5 at the game. Therefore, it can benefit the customer and the school.

Why would that make sense to me? Because a family that is out of town tomorrow for Thanksgiving can have that luxury to watch the game. In January during basketball season, there may be a night or two where it'll be too cold. 

I do appreciate the 3 private schools in Jackson on having their game broadcast online. Same goes to Peabody and Riverside for doing their broadcast on Facebook. Brentwood Academy did their game with Baylor on YouTube. What would it take for that to be broadcast in West TN? I'm sure BA spent a lot of money for that to be on YouTube.

Regardless, I do agree that NFHS is not a good idea. Wasn't a good idea to begin with, but not surprised because the TSSAA never go detail to detail on what will happen. They jumped in not knowing what's going on. Maybe emailing principal and AD's will be the next step to cut the contract...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigpun54 Medalist

Bigpun54

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, horse said:

You should call the administrator and read and explain it to him. And maybe he would change it because you don’t like the quality of the videos. 

I don’t think he’s talking as much as the quality it’s the whole notion of that network scamming these schools and creating another money racket for the TSSAA and yes on top of that using a poor video feed to justify it. U would’ve got a 750 dollar check from TNL if they could’ve live streamed it. Probably more than that network 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
horse Champion

horse

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bigpun54 said:

I don’t think he’s talking as much as the quality it’s the whole notion of that network scamming these schools and creating another money racket for the TSSAA and yes on top of that using a poor video feed to justify it. U would’ve got a 750 dollar check from TNL if they could’ve live streamed it. Probably more than that network 

Anything tsssa is involved with concerning money is a scam. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Futbolfan2022
      Bearden Bulldogs 2024

      By Futbolfan2022 · Posted

      They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • Dawgz4life
      Bearden Bulldogs 2024

      By Dawgz4life · Posted

      The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • Dawgz4life
      Bearden Bulldogs 2024

      By Dawgz4life · Posted

      I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • CoachT
      2024 Big Ones Contest Has Begun...Just Because I Miss Football Season

      By CoachT · Posted

      An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • Futbolfan2022
      Bearden Bulldogs 2024

      By Futbolfan2022 · Posted

      All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
×
  • Create New...