Region 6 2A

[@38320]

1. Riverside (cream of the crop so far; look better early than they did in playoffs last year) 

2. Huntingdon and Milan (tie)  (dogs and ponies always in the mix) 

3. Peabody (don't count them out just yet) 

4. Camden (simply going to score enough pts. to win a few more) 

5. Adamsville (jury still out) 

6. JCM (decent team but not ready for prime time) 

7. Gibson Co. (continuing to try to build) 

 

 

[vandyfan1]

11 hours ago, RHSPanther15 said:

After the first 3 weeks I would rank the region 

1A Riverside

1B Milan

3 Huntington

4 Peabody

5 Adamsville

6 Camden

7 Gibson Co

8 JCM

What changes would you make?

This is what I would have also. I think your spot on right now.

[Bulldog89]

8 hours ago, Croppygenius said:

Not sold on Milan yet. They haven't beaten a good team yet. Would flip flop them with the Mustangs!

Not sold on Milan is a fair opinion but insinuating that the you have beaten better competition so far this year well I guess we can agree to disagree.

[ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood]

1 hour ago, @38320 said:

1. Riverside (cream of the crop so far; look better early than they did in playoffs last year) 

2. Huntingdon and Milan (tie)  (dogs and ponies always in the mix) 

3. Peabody (don't count them out just yet) 

4. Camden (simply going to score enough pts. to win a few more) 

5. Adamsville (jury still out) 

6. JCM (decent team but not ready for prime time) 

7. Gibson Co. (continuing to try to build) 

 

 

Forgot Milan 

Nevermind saw you had a tie

Edited September 8, 2023 by ItsAlwaysSunnyInAtwood

[GeneralForrest]

On 7/30/2023 at 8:16 AM, @38320 said:

Riverside looks considerably better than last year. And they're on a mission, after that heartbreaker at Chatt in December. 

in july? thats quite an assertion. considerably better than a state runner up who has been to 2 semis in the last 5 years

[Croppygenius]

14 hours ago, Bulldog89 said:

Not sold on Milan is a fair opinion but insinuating that the you have beaten better competition so far this year well I guess we can agree to disagree.

No we have a lot to prove on the field. I've seen Milan play South Gibson and wasn't very impressed with either team. I know what the Mustangs have cause I go to practice about every day. In my opinion I would take the Mustangs in a matchup. Guess we'll find out on the 22nd! Just an old man's very experienced opinion.

[BIGPURPLEMACHINE]

23 hours ago, Croppygenius said:

Not sold on Milan yet. They haven't beaten a good team yet. Would flip flop them with the Mustangs!

Your right. South Gibson was a push over. 

[Croppygenius]

6 minutes ago, BIGPURPLEMACHINE said:

Your right. South Gibson was a push over. 

Witnessed Hardin Co scrimmage Riverside and the Panthers were clearly the better team. Hardin Co beats South Gibson soundly. Your right South Gibson is not very good.

[@38320]

11 hours ago, GeneralForrest said:

in july? thats quite an assertion. considerably better than a state runner up who has been to 2 semis in the last 5 years

Yea GF, I really believe that, and I might be wrong. But you know how it is with small schools, an injury or two can change everything.  It's just that I've followed them for 10 years and I've never seen them look this good early. Usually they get better as the season progresses. 

Edited September 9, 2023 by @38320

[BIGPURPLEMACHINE]

3 hours ago, Croppygenius said:

Witnessed Hardin Co scrimmage Riverside and the Panthers were clearly the better team. Hardin Co beats South Gibson soundly. Your right South Gibson is not very good.

I watched Dyersburg beat down Covington last week. Covington dogged Huntington in a scrimmage before the season. So that means Huntington is not very good right? Your logic doesn’t fly.